模糊层次分析法与灰色关联分析法结合选择虚拟企业合作伙伴

在敏捷供应链问题中,虚拟企业合作伙伴的选择是供应链的管理中重要的决策之一。论文主要对虚拟企业合作伙伴的选择问题进行了研究,综合考虑了合作伙伴的特别和影响,结合模糊数学和灰色理论,有效地集成了定性和定量问题,详细阐述了模糊层次分析法和灰色关联分析法用于选择虚拟企业合作伙伴的决策过程,并用实例证明了决策过程。     

打造成功的供应链合作伙伴关系

在供应链管理问题的研究中,人们强调最多的就是所谓供应链企业间的合作伙伴关系问题.合作伙伴关系为公司利用合作改善经营提供了机会.供应链的各个阶段是相互依赖的,应该彼此合作.然而,问题是如何开发合作伙伴关系?选择合适的对象(企业)作为供应链的合作伙伴,是加强供应链管理中最重要的一个基础,也是供应链成功的关键.市场权威研究机构加德纳集团(Gartner Group)预测,到2005年,对于一般企业来说,其全部供应链成本的65%将由企业外部的供应商承担.因此,选择合适的合作伙伴,打造成功的合作伙伴关系对于搞好供应链管理具有重要意义.然而,在实际运作中,不少企业在如何进行合作伙伴选择以及围绕合作伙伴选择工作,企业该怎么做,以及做些什么等问题上却往往容易步入一些思维上或行动上的误区,以致于众多企业在进行供应链合作伙伴选择时走了很多弯路,犯了很多错误,其结果不仅影响了供应链管理的绩效,而且还会导致大量资金、时间的浪费.因此,企业在进行合作伙伴选择之前,要三思而后行,谨防步入合作伙伴选择的误区.而一旦选择好了供应链合作伙伴,就应全力打造成功的供应链合作伙伴关系.     

打造成功的供应链合作伙伴关系

在供应链管理问题的研究中,人们强调最多的就是所谓供应链企业间的合作伙伴关系问题。合作伙伴关系为公司利用合作改善经营提供了机会。供应链的各个阶段是相互依赖的,应该彼此合作。然而,问题是如何开发合作伙伴关系?选择合适的对象(企业)作为供应链的合作伙伴,是加强供应链管     

打造成功的供应链合作伙伴关系

在供应链管理问题的研究中．人们强调最多的就是所谓供应链企业间的合作伙伴关系问题。合作伙伴关系为公司利用合作改善经营提供了机会。供应链的各个阶段是相互依赖的应该彼此合作。然而，问题是如何开发台作伙伴关系？选择合适的对象（企业）作为供应链的合作伙伴．是加强供应链管理中最重要的一个基础，也是供应链成功的关键。市场权威研究机构加德纳集团（Gartner Group）预测．     

我国体育器材企业供应链伙伴竞合博弈的研究

本文对我国体育器材企业供应链伙伴合作的现状和存在的问题进行了研究。根据博弈论原理,分析了国内供应链管理中合作伙伴的竞合关系,认为各成员是基于合作博弈来选择合作伙伴的。结合我国体育器材企业的实际问题提出若干对策。     

TOPSIS算法在供应链合作伙伴选择中的应用

合作伙伴的选择是供应链管理中重要的环节之一,通过对供应链合作伙伴关系的分析,提出了供应链合作伙伴的考核指标体系,建立了基于TOPSIS算法的供应链合作伙伴选择与评价模型,并通过示例说明如何通过TOPSIS算法选择最佳的合作伙伴。     

供应链战略合作伙伴关系的构建与管理

供应链战略合作伙伴关系的构建与管理是供应链管理的核心内容,本文分析了供应链战略合作伙伴关系的特点,论述了供应链战略合作伙伴的评价与选择,并从信息交流、知识共享和激励措施等方面研究了供应链合作伙伴的协调管理,从而确保真正实现供应链战略合作伙伴的共同利益。     

决策模型下的供应链合作伙伴选择评价研究

在全球经济一体化的经济大环境下,企业竞争的焦点以及企业机构的基本核心能力在于如何设计供应链,因此如何正确选择供应链上的合作伙伴就显得至关重要,对合作伙伴选择的研究方法越发得到国内外学者的重视和研究。本文建立了一种新的合作伙伴选择的多目标决策模型,该方法把信息熵法和多目标决策方法结合起来,最大限度地减少供应链合作伙伴选择过程中人为因素的影响,具有一定的参考使用价值。     

供应链战略合作伙伴评价和选择

本文针对当前供应链战略合作伙伴评价选择存在的问题,提出了基于战略价值、商业价值、合作意愿和企业能力等为主要标准的供应链战略合作伙伴评价指标体系,论述了该指标体系的意义;介绍了主要评价方法;最后对供应链战略合作伙伴评价选择的过程作了分析。     

供应链合作伙伴的选择及其关系管理

供应链管理适应于目前的竞争环境,其成败在很大程度上取决于合作伙伴的选择及对合作伙伴关系的管理。本文在相关文献回顾的基础上,从供应链合作伙伴关系的概念入手,总结了企业选择合作伙伴的利益理由,并指出这种关系建立的适用条件,明确了供应链合作伙伴选择的原则与方法,提出了可能出现的问题与风险,最后指出应对合作伙伴进行管理的模式。     

面向金融供应链的风险防范机制构建

金融供应链强调供应链的资金流与物流、信息流的整合与协调,是供应链管理的一个新的研究视角。本文以提高供应链中资金流、物流与信息流的协调性为目标,拟构建以第三方物流企业为主导的金融供应链风险防范机制,以期为提升供应链管理水平提供借鉴。     

供应链管理研究的若干问题

通过对供应链管理研究成果的回顾,揭示出供应链管理研究中的若干问题,在此基础上提出自己的认识。就现在所处的国际环境,对目前供应链管理的一些热点问题,如库存管理、物流系统规划、战略伙伴关系管理、绿色供应链、基于电子商务的供应链、供应链建模方法、信息支持技术及供应链绩效评估等,把它们分成三类来对其发展现状进行探讨。     

The building blocks of a supply chain management theory: Using factor market rivalry for supply chain theorizing

As the supply chain discipline matures, opportunities emerge to develop or define theories that are specific to supply chain phenomenon. The current research specifies characteristics that we offer which comprise the building blocks of supply chain theory. These characteristics include the flows of material through a supply chain network, the temporal management of these material flows, the dyadic and triadic interactions of firms within the supply chain network, and the outward focus on supply chain management (SCM), in other words a supply chain orientation, of firms in a supply chain. Further, recognizing that supply chain theories must contain the previously identified characteristics, we offer Factor Market Rivalry (FMR) as a theory of SCM. FMR refers to intense battles for resource positions that are needed to manufacture, provide, or deliver firm products or services. We argue that FMR only occurs within supply chain phenomena. The piece concludes with a future research agenda based upon the practical implications of further developing FMR as a theory of SCM.     

基于系统动力学的供应链库存管理研究

供应链库存管理是供应链管理研究中的热点问题,在系统动力学与供应链库存管理特点的基础上,应用系统动力学来研究供应链库存管理。对供应链中的供应商、制造商、分销商分别建立了库存管理系统动力学模型,进行仿真,得出结论,为供应链库存管理提供一种定量与定性相结合的管理决策方法。     

GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT

Global supply chains face a multitude of risks. A review of the recent literature reveals a few structured and systematic approaches for assessing risks in supply chains. However, there is no conceptual framework that ties together this literature. The purpose of this paper is to integrate literature from several disciplines ‐ including logistics, supply chain management, operations management, strategy, and international business ‐ to develop a model of global supply chain risk management. The implications for stakeholders and how future research could bring more insights to the phenomenon of global supply chain risk management are also discussed.     

供应链管理实践、供应链敏捷性对企业绩效的影响研究

市场竞争逐渐由企业间的竞争转化为供应链间的竞争,供应链管理日益受到关注。文章采集163家企业信息进行实证分析,探索供应链管理实践和供应链敏捷性对企业绩效的影响与作用机制。研究结果表明：供应链管理实践对企业绩效具有直接正向影响,供应链管理实践对供应链敏捷性具有直接正向影响,供应链敏捷性对企业绩效具有直接正向影响且在供应链管理实践与企业绩效之间发挥部分中介作用。     

Supply Chain Risk Management Approaches Under Different Conditions of Risk

A recent Deloitte study of 600 Supply Chain and C‐Level executives revealed that 45% felt that their supply chain risk management programs were only somewhat effective or not effective at all, while a mere 33% used risk management approaches to proactively and strategically manage supply chain risk based on conditions in their operating environment. Using a two‐method approach, the research summarized in this paper investigates the effectiveness of different supply chain risk management approaches by examining how performance varies when these approaches are applied under different risk conditions. The results counter prevailing knowledge regarding the appropriate use of such widely acknowledged risk management approaches as postponement and speculation, and highlight the dangers of functionally isolated decision making. The results lend credence to increasing calls for interdisciplinary research to address broad‐based supply and demand chain problems, and support the need to utilize performance metrics such as net profit to accurately assess supply chain decisions.     

A supply chain management framework for services

While services represent the largest sector of the global economy, 86.8% in the United States, most supply chain management (SCM) research is focused on product flows. Executives in manufacturing firms have benefited from frameworks created to implement SCM processes, but this is not the case for their counterparts in service companies. The two most cited SCM frameworks for services have methodological and conceptual deficiencies. Drawing upon the service-dominant logic of marketing and using an empirical research approach, we developed supply chain structure maps for nine service firms. Our findings indicate that the supply chain structure maps of service companies are comparable to those in the product-based literature, which supports the service-dominant logic. Then, we identified the six key processes that constitute a framework to manage service supply chains. The customer relationship management and the supplier relationship management processes form the critical links in the supply chain, and the other four processes are coordinated through this linkage. The SCM framework for services provides direction for executives in service firms who need to increase cross-functional integration within their firms and with other members of the supply chain. For academics, 12 avenues for future research are identified.     

ACTION RESEARCH IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT—A FRAMEWORK FOR RELEVANT AND RIGOROUS RESEARCH

In this article we present a framework that researchers can use when they prepare and conduct Action Research (AR) projects. Authors can also use the framework as a guide for how to write relevant and rigorous AR articles. AR is an applied form of case‐based research that can provide exceedingly relevant research in applied fields such as supply chain management. At the same time, AR is also a criticized research approach, particularly in terms of research rigor. With the ambition to address, as well as bridge, the gap between the relevance and rigor within AR research, we first develop a comprehensive research methodology framework that synthesizes the crucial aspects of the AR research methodology. Secondly, we review existing AR articles within logistics, operations management, and supply chain management and present the current state of AR research. After a critical review of the existing articles using our framework, we delineate vital aspects that should be addressed in future AR research. As relevance and rigor are not at odds, we believe that our comprehensive framework will pave the way for a growing stream of rigorous, as well as relevant, AR research.