A novel method for computing single output for DEA with application in hospital efficiency

There are two main methods for measuring the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs): data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages. DEA is more popular in the literature due to its simplicity, as it does not require any pre-assumption and can be used for measuring the efficiency of DMUs with multiple inputs and multiple outputs, whereas SFA is a parametric approach that is applicable to multiple inputs and a single output. Since many applied studies feature multiple output variables, SFA cannot be used in such cases. In this research, a unique method to transform multiple outputs to a virtual single output is proposed. We are thus able to obtain efficiency scores from calculated virtual single output by the proposed method that are close (or even the same depending on targeted parameters at the expense of computation time and resources) to the efficiency scores obtained from multiple outputs of DEA. This will enable us to use SFA with a virtual single output. The proposed method is validated using a simulation study, and its usefulness is demonstrated with real application by using a hospital dataset from Turkey.     

A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis

DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) attempts to identify sources and estimate amounts of inefficiencies contained in the outputs and inputs generated by managed entities called DMUs (Decision Making Units). Explicit formulation of underlying functional relations with specified parametric forms relating inputs to outputs is not required. An overall (scalar) measure of efficiency is obtained for each DMU from the observed magnitudes of its multiple inputs and outputs without requiring use of a priori weights or relative value assumptions and, in addition, sources and amounts of inefficiency are estimated for each input and each output for every DMU. Earlier theory is extended so that DEA can deal with zero inputs and outputs and zero virtual multipliers (shadow prices). This is accomplished by partitioning DMUs into six classes via primal and dual representation theorems by means of which restrictions to positive observed values for all inputs and outputs are eliminated along with positivity conditions imposed on the variables which are usually accomplished by recourse to nonarchimedian concepts. Three of the six classes are scale inefficient and two of the three scale efficient classes are also technically (zero waste) efficient.The refereeing process of this paper was handled through R. Banker. This paper was prepared as part of the research supported by National Science Foundation grant SES-8722504 and by the IC² Institute of The University of Texas and was initially submitted in May 1985.     

基于DEA模型的我国轻工业经营效率研究

运用DEA模型对我国31个省区市轻工业的经营效率进行了实证研究和分析,结果表明,大部分省份轻工业的经营效率是非DEA有效的,尤其是沿海发达地区的轻工业大省。针对此现象进行了深入分析,并提出了相应的对策。     

A new methodology to measure efficiencies of inputs (outputs) of decision making units in Data Envelopment Analysis with application to agriculture

This paper aims at developing a new methodology to measure and decompose global DMU efficiency into efficiency of inputs (or outputs). The basic idea rests on the fact that global DMU's efficiency score might be misleading when managers proceed to reallocate their inputs or redefine their outputs. Literature provides a basic measure for global DMU's efficiency score. A revised model was developed for measuring efficiencies of global DMUs and their inputs (or outputs) efficiency components, based on a hypothesis of virtual DMUs. The present paper suggests a method for measuring global DMU efficiency simultaneously with its efficiencies of inputs components, that we call Input decomposition DEA model (ID-DEA), and its efficiencies of outputs components, that we call output decomposition DEA model (OD-DEA). These twin models differ from Supper efficiency model (SE-DEA) and Common Set Weights model (CSW-DEA). The twin models (ID-DEA, OD-DEA) were applied to agricultural farms, and the results gave different efficiency scores of inputs (or outputs), and at the same time, global DMU's efficiency score was given by the Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (Charnes et al., 1978) [1], CCR78 model. The rationale of our new hypothesis and model is the fact that managers don't have the same information level about all inputs and outputs that constraint them to manage resources by the (global) efficiency scores. Then each input/output has a different reality depending on the manager's decision in relationship to information available at the time of decision. This paper decomposes global DMU's efficiency into input (or output) components' efficiencies. Each component will have its score instead of a global DMU score. These findings would improve management decision making about reallocating inputs and redefining outputs. Concerning policy implications of the DEA twin models, they help policy makers to assess, ameliorate and reorient their strategies and execute programs towards enhancing the best practices and minimising losses.     

Data Envelopment Analysis with Reverse Inputs and Outputs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) assumes that inputs and outputs are measured on scales in which larger numerical values correspond to greater consumption of inputs and greater production of outputs. We present a class of DEA problems in which one or more of the inputs or outputs are naturally measured on scales in which higher numerical values represent lower input consumption or lower output production. We refer to such quantities as reverse inputs and reverse outputs. We propose to incorporate reverse inputs and outputs into a DEA model by returning to the basic principles that lead to the DEA model formulation. We compare our method to reverse scoring, the most commonly used approach, and demonstrate the relative advantages of our proposed technique. We use this concept to analyze all 30 Major League Baseball (MLB) organizations during the 1999 regular season to determine their on-field and front office relative efficiencies. Our on-field DEA model employs one output and two symmetrically defined inputs, one to measure offense and one to measure defense. The defensive measure is such that larger values correspond to worse defensive performance, rather than better, and hence is a reverse input. The front office model uses one input. Its outputs, one of which is a reverse output, are the inputs to the on-field model. We discuss the organizational implications of our results.     

Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of not-for-profit organizations: A critical evaluation—comment

This note responds to Nunamaker (1985) who supposedly deals with deficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as an approach for (1) measuring efficiencies of not-for-profit entities identified as Decision Making Units (DMUs) and (2) locating sources and amounts of inefficiencies in each of the inputs used and in each of the outputs produced by each DMU. Corrections and comments are offered with references supplied for interested readers who wish to examine more detailed treatments of the topics covered.     

Child maturation, time-invariant, and time-varying inputs: their interaction in the production of child human capital

We model the relationship over time between multiple good and bad inputs to the child development production process and the multiple good and bad outcomes which are generated. Doing this avoids several well-known empirical problems associated with construction and use of aggregated inputs and outputs, the assumption of separability among inputs and outputs, and the estimation of reduced forms. Using time-demeaned data for a balanced panel of families from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth?CChild Sample for 1994?C2000, we estimate an output-oriented directional distance function that simultaneously relates good and bad inputs from home, school, and environment, to good and bad outcomes, measured as children??s math and reading test scores as well as parent-reported behavior problems. We are able for the first time to compute partial effects among endogenous outputs. Recovering consistent estimates of time-invariant coefficients using a second-stage estimator, we find that some time-invariant variables are significant. We also measure productivity growth, technical change, efficiency change, and technical efficiency. Children??s productivity growth is highest at age 5?years and diminishes thereafter. Finally, we investigate the effect on these estimates of the choice of alternative direction vectors for the good and bad outputs.     

Stochastic DEA Models With Different Types of Input-Output Disturbances

This paper presents stochasticmodels in data envelopment analysis (DEA) for the possibilityof variations in inputs and outputs. Efficiency measure of adecision making unit (DMU) is defined via joint probabilisticcomparisons of inputs and outputs with other DMUs and can becharacterized by solving a chance constrained programming problem.By utilizing the theory of chance constrained programming, deterministicequivalents are obtained for both situations of multivariatesymmetric random disturbances and a single random factor in theproduction relationships. The linear deterministic equivalentand its dual form are obtained via the goal programming theoryunder the assumption of the single random factor. An analysisof stochastic variable returns to scale is developed using theidea of stochastic supporting hyperplanes. The relationshipsof our stochastic DEA models with some conventional DEA modelsare also discussed.     

Estimating capacity utilization of Chinese manufacturing industries

This study investigates the capacity utilization (CU) of Chinese manufacturing industries, using a CU indicator based on data envelopment analysis and directional distance functions (DDFs). The inputs are separated into variable inputs and a quasi-fixed input to measure the gap of DDFs, which indicated either under-utilization of inputs or overcapacity. Moreover, we define an indicator for CU change over time and introduced the corresponding decomposition. We note that, during the study time period (2007–2010), the CU of Chinese manufacturing industries improved, which implies that Chinese manufacturing industries expanded their production and got closer to their capacity during the examined period. The driving force of this improvement is technical changes. The higher average CU values of light manufacturing industries than that of the heavy industries and the extremely high CU values of two light industries reveal a severe overcapacity problem in the light industries. We also provided the methods and conduct analysis on determining optimal variable inputs and the type of the overcapacity on specific DMUs. The bootstrap regression procedures are employed to test the influence of environmental variables on CU values. Finally, we provide policy implications and suggestions for policymakers who oversee the development of Chinese manufacturing industries.     

Measuring efficiency under fixed proportion technologies

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) applications frequently involve nonsubstitutable inputs and nonsubstitutable outputs (that is, fixed proportion technologies). However, DEA theory requires substitutability. In this paper, we illustrate the consequences of nonsubstitutability on DEA efficiency estimates, and we develop new efficiency indicators that are similar to those of conventional DEA models except that they require nonsubstitutability. Then, using simulated and real-world datasets that encompass fixed proportion technologies, we compare DEA efficiency estimates with those of the new indicators. The examples demonstrate that DEA efficiency estimates are biased when inputs and outputs are nonsubstitutable. The degree of bias varies considerably among Decision Making Units, resulting in substantial differences in efficiency rankings between DEA and the new measures. And, over 90% of the units that DEA identifies as efficient are, in truth, not efficient. We conclude that when inputs and outputs are not substituted for either technological or other reasons, conventional DEA models should be replaced with models that account for nonsubstitutability.     

Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis

While conventional DEA models set targets separately for each DMU, in this paper we consider that there is a centralized decision maker (DM) who “owns” or supervises all the operating units. In such intraorganizational scenario the DM has an interest in maximizing the efficiency of individual units at the same time that total input consumption is minimized or total output production is maximized. Two new DEA models are presented for such resource allocation. One type of model seeks radial reductions of the total consumption of every input while the other type seeks separate reductions for each input according to a preference structure. In both cases, total output production is guaranteed not to decrease. The two key features of the proposed models are their simplicity and the fact that both of them project all DMUs onto the efficient frontier. The dual formulation shows that optimizing total input consumption and output production is equivalent to finding weights that maximize the relative efficiency of a virtual DMU with average inputs and outputs. A graphical interpretation as well as numerical results of the proposed models are presented.     

Multiple Objective Approach as an Alternative to Radial Projection in DEA

Radial projection is a standard technique applied in data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate efficiency scores for input and/or output variables. In this paper, we have studied the appropriateness of radial projection for target setting. We have created a situation where the decision making units (DMUs) are free to choose their own target values on the efficient frontier and then compared the results to those of radial projection. In practice, target values are primarily used for future goal attainment; hence, not only preferences but also, and on the whole, change in time frame, affect the choice of target values. Based on that, we conducted an empirical experiment with an aim to study how the DMUs choose their most preferred target values on the efficient frontier. The subjects, who all were students of the Helsinki School of Economics, were given the freedom to explore their personalized efficient frontiers by using a multiple objective linear programming (MOLP) approach. To study various and relevant scenarios, the personalized efficient frontiers for all students were constructed in such a way that the current position of each student in relation to the frontier made him/her inefficient, efficient, or super-efficient. The results show that the use of radial projection for target setting is too restrictive.     

Restricting Multiple-Output Multiple-Input DEA Models by Disaggregating the Output–Input Vector

One of the strengths of DEA in the measurement of technical efficiency is that it readily accommodates multiple-output multiple-input production technologies. In doing so, it assumes that each of the inputs is used jointly in the production of each output. In some applied studies, this can be undesirable. We propose a new disaggregated formulation that allows a specific output to be made independent of a specific input, while maintaining the joint production relationship for the other outputs and inputs. We demonstrate the approach by applying it to measure the technical efficiency of national rail systems in 20 countries between 1990 and 1998.JEL Classification: C6, D24, N7     

On the Use of Value Efficiency Analysis and Some Further Developments

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of Value Efficiency Analysis (VEA) in efficiency evaluation when preference information is taken into account. Value efficiency analysis is an approach, which applies the ideas developed for Multiple Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Preference information is given through the desirable structure of input- and output-values. The same values can be used for all units under evaluation or the values can be specific for each unit. A decision-maker can specify the input- and output-values subjectively without any support or (s)he can use a multiple criteria support system to assist him/her to find those values on the efficient frontier. The underlying assumption is that the most preferred values maximize the decision-maker's implicitly known value function in a production possibility set or a subset. The purpose of value efficiency analysis is to estimate a need to increase outputs and/or decrease inputs for reaching the indifference contour of the value function at the optimum. In this paper, we briefly review the main ideas in value efficiency analysis and discuss practical aspects related to the use of value efficiency analysis. We also consider some extensions.     

Efficiency measurement when producers control pollutants: a non-parametric approach

This paper treats efficiency measurement when some outputs are undesirable and producers control pollutants by end-of-pipe or change-in-process abatement. A data envelopment analysis framework that compares producers with similar pollution control efforts is proposed. First, my approach avoids arbitrary disposability assumptions for undesirable outputs. Second, the model is used to evaluate the interplay between pollution control activities and technical efficiency. I compare my approach to the traditional neo-classical production model that does not incorporate undesirable outputs among outputs, and to Färe et al.’s (Rev Econ Stat 71:90–98, 1989, J Econom 126:469–492, 2005) well-known model that incorporates bads. I evaluate the common assumption in the literature on polluting technologies, that inputs are allocatable to pollution control, and apply U.S. electricity data to illustrate my main point: Although my empirical model specifications are in line with the literature on polluting technologies, they rely on inputs that play an insignificant role in controlling nitrogen oxides (NO_x) emissions. Consequentially, there are no reasons to expect the efficiency scores of the traditional model to differ from the efficiency scores of the other two models that account for resources employed to pollution control. Statistical tests show that my model, which explicitly takes pollution control efforts into account, produces efficiency scores that are not statistically different from the traditional model’s scores for all model specifications, while Färe et al.’s model produces significantly different results for some model specifications. I conclude that the popular production models that incorporate undesirable outputs may not be applicable to all cases involving polluting production and that more emphasis on appropriate empirical specifications is needed.     

The Extraction of Technical Coefficients from Input and Output Data

Presumably, input-output coefficients reflect technology, and these coefficients measure the input requirements per unit of product. This concept has been extended to consumption theory, where it models expenditure shares. Input-output coefficients are extracted from the national accounts of an economy, by taking average proportions between inputs and outputs. Since the latter represent all sorts of inefficiencies, this practice blurs the measurement of technology. Input requirements are better measured by minimal proportions between inputs and outputs. This approach separates the measurement of technology from that of productive efficiency.     

An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems

This research applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methodology to evaluate the efficiency of units within a large-scale network of petroleum distribution facilities in the USA. Multiple inputs and outputs are incorporated into a broad set of DEA models, yielding a comprehensive approach to evaluating supply chain efficiency. This study empirically separates three recognized, important and yet different causes of performance shortfalls which have been generally difficult for managers to identify. They are: (1) managerial effectiveness; (2) scale of operations and potential for a given market area (and efficiency of resource allocation given the scale); and (3) understanding the resource heterogeneity via programmatic differences in efficiency. Overall, the efficiency differences identified raised insightful questions regarding top management’s selection of the appropriate form and type of inputs and outputs, as well as questions regarding the DEA model form selected.     

Application of evidential reasoning approach and OWA operator weights in road safety evaluation considering the best and worst practice frontiers

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has recently become relatively popular with road safety experts. Therefore, various decision-making units (DMUs), such as EU countries, have been assessed in terms of road safety performance (RSP). However, the DEA has been criticized because it evaluates DMUs based only on the concept of self-assessment, and, therefore does not provide a unique ranking for DMUs. Therefore, cross efficiency method (CEM) was developed to overcome this shortcoming. Peer-evaluations in addition to self-evaluation have made the CEM to be recognized as an effective method for ranking DMUs. The traditional CEM is based only on the standard CCR (Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes) model, and it evaluates DMUs according to their position relative to the best practice frontier while neglecting the worst practice frontier. However, the DMUs can also be assessed based on their position relative to the worst practice frontier. In this regard, the present study aims to provide a double-frontier CEM for assessing RSP by taking into account the best and worst frontiers simultaneously. For this purpose, the cross efficiency and cross anti-efficiency matrices are generated.Even though a weighted average method (WAM) is most frequently used for cross efficiency aggregation, the decision maker's (DM) preference structure may not be reflected. For this reason, the present study mainly focuses on the evidential reasoning approach (ERA), as a nonlinear aggregation method, rather than the linear WAM. Equal weights are often used for cross efficiency aggregation; consequently, the effect of the DM's subjective judgments in obtaining the overall efficiency is ignored. In this respect, the minimax entropy approach (MEA) and the maximum disparity approach (MMDA) are applied for determining the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator weights for cross efficiency aggregation. The weighted cross efficiencies and cross anti-efficiencies are then aggregated using the ERA. Finally, the proposed method, called DF-CEM-ERA, is used to evaluate the RSP of EU countries as well as Serbian police departments (PDs).     

Determining paths of innovation: The role of culture on the adoption on organic farming management

The aim of this paper is to understand whether national culture is linked with operative performance of organic agriculture. The ultimate goal is, indeed, to measure the impact of social change on technical innovation and sustainability issues. We built an econometric model where the impact of some of the six dimensions of national culture by Geert Hofstede is tested on inputs and outputs of organic production, on a country-based scale. We collected data about the evolution of organic agriculture through the last two decades, extracting data about 27 countries of the European Union from 2000 to 2017. We tested the dataset into two passages: we first employed a DEA model to assess efficiency of organic farming, and then we correlated results to Hofstede 6-D model of national culture. We observed the existence of a relationship between culture and innovation, explaining the importance of determined values in people's management within the firm. The operative performance of organic agriculture is linked to determined culturally influenced business values. We used efficiency results as variables for measuring innovation approach based on cultural models. It has been enhanced the relevance to the nexus innovation-culture approaching to one of the most innovation-resistant industrial sectors.     

Dual Representations of Non-Parametric Technologies and Measurement of Technical Efficiency

This paper extends the recent work by Frei and Harker on projections onto efficient frontiers (1999) in three ways. First, we provide a formal definition of the production set as the intersection of a finite number of closed halfspaces. We emphasize the necessity of a complete enumeration of the supporting hyperplanes to define the production set properly. We focus on the problem of exhaustive enumeration of the supporting hyperplanes to characterize the production set. Second, we consider the problem of an arbitrary-norm projection on the boundary of the production set. We use the concept of the Hölder distance function and we derive the necessary mathematics to calculate distances and projections of inefficient DMUs onto the efficient frontier. Third, we introduce a relevant weighting scheme for inputs and outputs so that the Hölder distance function respects the commensurability axiom defined by Russell (1988). Finally, we present an illustration using the same data set as Frei and Harker (1999) to highlight some of the extensions proposed in the paper.