共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
提出了Turbo乘积码的并行迭代译码原理,对比分析了一种新的并行迭代译码器和传统的串行译码器,给出了以扩展汉明码(32,26,4)、(64,57,4)为子码的二维Turbo乘积码(32,26,4)。、(64,57,4)。在通过两种不同的译码器时的仿真结果。仿真结果表明,采取并行迭代译码器,在保持同样的译码性能的同时降低了译码延时。 相似文献
2.
本文以传统单正交码扩频技术为基础,提出了一种双多进制正交码扩频 4DPSK的复合调制方式,以进一步提高频谱利用率。首先给出了复合调制方案以及采用最大后验概率(MAP)准则的最佳非相干接收方法,其次提出了适合Turbo乘积码(TPC)SISO(软输入软输出)译码的软判决信息提取算法,最后测试了系统在高斯白噪声信道下的误比特性能。仿真表明该系统可以获得比传统正交扩频系统更高的抗噪声干扰能力,引入TPC编码技术后性能有较大改善。 相似文献
3.
针对置信传播(Belief Propagation,BP)译码算法在迭代次数较多时吞吐量和译码时延性能提升受限的问题,提出了一种低迭代次数的极化码BP译码算法,通过采用比特翻转和子信道冻结的方式,降低译码过程中的迭代次数。仿真结果表明,相对于传统极化码BP译码算法(设置最大迭代次数为40次),所提算法在信噪比为3 dB时可将平均迭代次数减少约53%,处理单元平均计算次数减少约68%。该算法所带来的低时延和低功耗效益可运用在对功耗要求较高的大规模机器类型通信,以及对时延要求较高的超可靠低延迟通信等5G场景下的极化码译码中。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
在5G通信网络中,极化码作为一种高性能纠错码技术,应用于广播信道以及控制信道。针对极化码串行抵消(Successive Cancellation,SC)译码算法存在冗余运算、译码时延过高的问题,在传统的串行抵消译码算法基础上,提出了对三种不同码型的快速译码方法,避免了对子节点的遍历,消除了冗余。通过理论分析该特定码型的快速译码方法,在不改变译码的误码率的条件下,这三种特定码型的时钟消耗从t-3、t-3、2t-5减小为1、1、2,大大降低了译码时延。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
针对低密度奇偶校验(LDPC)码在高信噪比区域可能存在错误平层的缺点,提出了一种低错误平层LDPC码的新构造方法。该方法的基本矩阵由渐进边增长(PEG)算法与近似环额外信息度(ACE)算法相结合,目的是提升基本矩阵中环的连通性;然后将基于分割移位(PS)的循环移位系数矩阵对基本矩阵循环扩展,以此构造出校验矩阵。该方法除了能够改善高信噪比区域的错误平层,还具有码长、码率的任意可设性特点。仿真结果表明,PAP-LDPC(3 600,2 700)码在信噪比为4 dB以后并未出现明显的错误平层。 相似文献
13.
在深空测距任务中,高精度的伪码捕获是后续执行伪码跟踪的关键前提。传统基于时频二维搜索的频偏估计算法对于深空测距中频率偏移范围较大的情况难以满足伪码捕获实时性要求。为此,提出了改进的时频二维搜索算法,通过在传统时频二维搜索算法的前端引入快速傅里叶变换(Fast Fourier Transform,FFT)算法对多普勒频偏进行预估,避免在大多普勒范围的频点遍历,能够有效降低频偏估计的时间开销。实验表明,该方法能够在大多普勒频偏环境下利用有限的硬件资源快速地实现伪码捕获,满足伪码捕获的实时性要求。 相似文献
14.
针对短码、周期长码直扩信号在不同的时延下伪码序列估计问题,提出了一种基于奇异值分解的盲解扩算法。在已知信息码元速率和伪码周期条件的前提下,算法首先把接收到的直扩信号按照一定长度进行分段构成相关矩阵并对此矩阵进行奇异值分解得出信号子空间,然后根据信号子空间和伪码序列的模糊关系,利用求解的模糊酉矩阵和特定约束条件(如m序列)去其模糊性,最终估计出伪码序列。仿真结果表明,该算法不仅解决了在不同的时延下估计伪码序列带来的问题,而且具有稳定性高、在低信噪比条件下有良好的估计性能等优点。 相似文献
15.
卫星导航系统中,采用扩展复制重叠法(Extended Replica Folding Acquisition Search Technique,XFAST)对长PN码进行直接捕获时,粗捕后得到的对齐码相位存在重叠模糊度。为减少去模糊处理的计算量,提高捕获速度,提出了一种新的去模糊处理算法。新算法在得到粗捕对齐码相位结果后,先对本地码序列重新按照对齐相位进行排列、分段、段内循环移位等操作,然后进行段间叠加,再与接收码序列通过FFT-IFFT运算实现循环相关运算,从而确定对齐码相位所在的子码段,得到无模糊度的捕获结果。理论分析与仿真结果证明,该算法可以在分段叠加段数和子段长满足一定关系的条件下,在检测性能满足系统要求下,大大降低去模糊处理的计算量和操作时间,从而提高捕获速度。 相似文献
16.
UxDMA算法是一种高效的集中式算法,是用于时分多址、频分多址和码分多址信道分配的统一算法。在UxDMA的基础上,利用多波束天线的多波束形成能力,针对低时延定向ad hoc网络提出了一种集中式调度算法——CLSM(Centralized Low-delay Scheduling Algorithm Based on Multi-beam Antennas)。CLSM通过不同时延等级限制的报文来比较着色后发送链路的优先级,优先选择高优先级链路传输。通过仿真验证了CLSM的性能:与UxDMA相比,该算法在多时延限制的发送端调度中表现出了更好的吞吐量和时延性能。 相似文献
17.
Retailers often use Tensile Price Claims (TPC) such as “upto 40% off” or “from 10% to 40% off” to promote a line of merchandize. This enables them to have a salient communication while allowing specific level of discount on particular items. Recently, retailers have started using just-below TPC frames such as “upto 39% off”. This research explores the influence of TPC framed with “just-below” numbers on consumers’ perceived benefits through three studies. The results indicate that just-below temporal frames have a more favorable impact on consumer perceptions than round frames; this is contrary to left digit salience heuristic but is in line with anchoring and adjustment theory. The effect of just-below framing disappears both for deep discount levels and with sequential TPC discounts. This study has important managerial implications for the use of TPC as a promotional tool. The study also contributes to theory in multiple ways. 相似文献
18.
Jung Eun Lee 《心理学和销售学》2019,36(1):57-71
Retailers frequently use exaggerated price discount advertisements with a tensile price claim (TPC; e.g., “Save up to 70%”) to attract consumers because they expect that once consumers enter a store, they will purchase low‐ or medium‐discounted products. Drawing on the selective accessibility model, this study investigated the way in which an implausibly high maximum level of savings stated in a TPC influences consumers’ expected price discount (EPD) and perceptions of actual price discounts across different types of TPCs (i.e., TPC stating a maximum level and TPC stating a range of savings). This study also investigated two situations in which consumers have previous knowledge of a product’s price discount versus when they have less or no knowledge of the discount. For both conditions, a single‐anchor TPC (i.e., “Save up to Y%”) that stated an implausible maximum level of savings led to a higher EPD and lower perceptions of the deal (i.e., perceived savings, price fairness, and perceived value) with respect to the actual price discount than did a TPC with a plausible maximum level of savings. In contrast, when the TPC stated two anchors (i.e., “Save X–Y%”) and consumers had knowledge of the price discount, their EPDs assimilated only toward the plausible anchor (X), and ignored the implausibly high maximum price discount (Y), resulting in a lower EPD and higher perceptions of the deal of the actual price discounts than a TPC that stated a plausibly high maximum level of savings. In contrast, when consumers had no knowledge of the price discount, their EPDs only adjusted toward the more plausible anchor (X), regardless of whether they perceived the maximum anchor as plausible or implausible. Thus, there was no difference in consumers’ perceptions of “Save X–Y%” between implausibly and plausibly high Y%. 相似文献