股市的羊群效应——浅谈经济心理学模仿理论的现实应用

正经济心理学雏发于上世纪50年代初期,强调对经济行为的研究不仅要应用经济学的理论和方法,还要运用心理学、社会学以及文化人类学等从各个学术领域展开研究。由此可以看出经济心理学是通过对"人类经济行为的研究",将经济学、心理学、社会学、文化人类学综合后进行的一种综合性分析,是开展经济现象研究的一种方法。结合所学的相关知识,本文试图通过描述经济心理学中模仿理论的现实应用——股市中的羊群     

新制度经济学对现代会计的影响

人类社会的会计演进与经济发展始终是一种互动式的关系。从会计理论的发展史来看．会计理论已经和正在受到经济学理论的巨大影响．经济学理论对会计学研究的支撑加深了会计研究的深度．会计学研究对经济理论的应用也拓宽了会计研究的广度。20世纪七十年代中期以来．以科斯等为代表的新制度经济学在经济学理论中的影响力日益增加．成为西方经济学界一个引人注目的现象。新制度经济学不但为经济理论研究提供了一种全新的思路及颇有价值的方法．同时也对会计理论研究产生了重大影响。契约经济学、代理理论、产权经济学、信息经济学、公共选择等经济学理论和实证研究方法被广泛地应用于会计研究领域．大大丰富了会计理论及其研究方法。     

行为组织经济学综述

行为组织经济学是以行为经济学的相关理论为基础去研究组织行为的，该领域出现了一大批有指导性的研究成果，这样为组织实践带来更好的指导，文章通过对菜宾斯坦的x效率理论和卡梅拉和马尔门迪尔的委托代理复杂化模型作介绍，以求对行为组织经济学这本学科作出综述。     

环境经济学

研究环境经济学的基本理论。探讨环境与经济的内在联系和相互作用的关系，揭示发展经济与保护环境必须协调发展的客观规律，从理论与实践阐明社会主义经济规律、价值规律等在环境保护领域中如何发挥作用，为制定我国的环境保护方针、技术经济政策、环境规划提供理论根据。     

行为公司金融研究及其应用

行为公司金融是行为经济学研究的新兴领域。从管理者行为与股票市场行为构成的四种组合出发，本文对行为公司金融的研究现状做了分类阐述，并就如何应用这些理论分析我国上市公司与金融市场的发展提出了新的视角。     

现代经济学的基本分析框架与研究方法

随着市场经济快速发展,学者对经济领域的研究日渐加深。现代经济学是以研究市场经济中的行为和现象作为基础,以提出促进市场经济健康发展的有效措施。现代经济学基本框架是指现代经济学基本分析框架,通过该框架能够理解和诠释经济行为及现象,了解基本框架对于深入研究经济现象具有积极的促进作用。文章对研究基本分析框架与研究方法的重要性进行分析和研究,并分别阐述基本分析框架与研究方法,旨在为相关研究提供参考。     

论狭义与广义的空间经济学

空间经济学有狭义与广义之分。狭义空间经济学的研究对象为生产资料在地理空间的配置与生产过程。广义空间经济学是关于空间维度研究的一个系统整合过程,其研究领域覆盖了狭义空间经济学、经济地理学、区域经济学、贸易理论以及城市经济学等学科。广义空间经济学研究的内容广泛、复杂,既包括微观个体行为也包括宏观层面的经济增长与政策分析,关注的是更加一般抽象化的空间因素,既包括有形的又包括无形的,并且是用历史发展的眼光来综合研究空间结构的动态发展。在空间经济学研究过程中,应当以广义空间经济学为基本的研究背景,抓住研究重点,具体问题具体分析。     

经济行为基本特征的假设检验与实证逻辑

现代经济学对理性行为假设的"公理化"认同,是否可替代或超越理论检验和实践验证。本文提出对基本行为假设应进行科学的检验以分析其现实合理性和完善实证逻辑基础,探讨应用经济实证方法的有效前提和局限性,指出:基于现代经济学对中国现实问题的计量实证研究需要进行总体无差异性检验;要重视研究不同环境中经济行为的异质性和基本结构的异化;需要发展和结合多种实证方法等,以此提高实证效果和促进中国经济理论建设。     

财政学专业建设的国外理论与文献研究综述

按照西方经济学对公共财政学专业及课程的研究,财政学作为经济学的二级学科,需要站在经济学的视角、运用经济理论和经济方法开展研究分析工作。财政学专业建设应以对政府行为及活动的研究为中心,兼顾对学生理论及实践能力的培养。     

简析公共选择学派的主要理论——兼论其对当代财政理论的贡献

公共选择学派于上世纪60年代形成,隶属新自由主义经济学,开创了用经济学理论研究政治问题的先河。本文对公共选择学派的四个主要理论分别进行了介绍和评述,它们是投票理论、官僚经济理论、寻租理论和民主财政理论。笔者认为公共选择学派的理论推进了当代财政理论的发展,于文末分别从研究方法和研究领域两个方面论述了其对财政理论的贡献。     

Economic Sociology in Retrospect and Prospect

A bstract Theory and research in the field of economic sociology have seen steady advancements in recent years. Economic sociology has become a legitimate branch of sociology as well as of economics. Nonetheless, the treatment of economic sociology in both modern economics and sociology leaves much to be desired. Various formal-terminological confusions and theoretical-substantive misconceptions are still present in the field. The present article advances some proposals for remedying this situation. In particular, it provides clarifications of and amendments to the current treatment of issues, such as the relationship between economics and sociology, the character of economic sociology, its links to economic theory, socio-economics, and rational choice theory, as well as the question of the old versus the new economic sociology. Special emphasis is placed on the relationships between economic sociology and rational choice theory, given the latter's claims to universality. It is hoped that the article will thereby redress certain inconsistencies found in some previous treatments of economic sociology as well as stimulate further refinements.     

经济学理论对会计学研究的渗透

在现代会计研究领域,会计学研究与经济学理论的连接越来越密切。从经济学角度解释会计目标和全面收益理论、用经济学观点研究会计准则、以经济学立场剖析会计诚信缺失以及将经济学的实证方法用于会计学研究等等,经济学对会计学研究的支持加深了会计学研究的深度,会计学研究对经济学的应用拓宽了会计研究的广度。正确处理会计学研究与经济学理论的关系,有助于进一步提升和推进会计理论研究,更好地为会计实务服务。     

论制度经济学与中国经济发展

本文介绍了马克思主义制度经济学和西方制度经济学的发展和主要理论,并与中国经济发展结合,从制度经济学的角度研究了中国经济在进一步发展中应该重点关注的问题。     

Max Weber as an Economist and as a Sociologist

A bstract In this article I first give a picture of Weber as an economist, mainly by focussing on a text which he distributed to his students when he taught economics in the 1890s. From this text it is, for example, clear that Weber was positive to the use of marginal utility theory in theoretical economics, but also felt that this approach was insufficient, by itself, to analyze empirical phenomena. I then outline Weber's work in economic sociology, relying primarily on Economy and Society and its central Chapter 2 ("Sociological Categories of Economic Action"). The differences between the approaches of economic theory and economic sociology, as seen by Weber, are summarized, and an account is given of some of Weber's most suggestive concepts in economic sociology. In the concluding section the question is raised as to when the analyst, according to Weber, should use economic sociology rather than economic theory, and vice versa. Weber's ideas about a broad economic science–what he termed Sozialökonomik or social economics–are also presented.     

经济学实验室建设在高等职业学校教学中的应用

随着经济全球化和全球信息化的快速发展,社会对经济与管理类专业人才的需求越来越迫切。但是,要培养出大量合格的、具有创新精神和实践能力的经济与管理类专业的高素质人才,必须要有高水平的实验室作为保障。如何培养和造就厚基础、宽口径、高素质、强能力、重实践、重个性的经济管理类应用型人才成为经济管理类院校的新课题。而加强实验室建设,则成为使学生既了解经济及管理科学的理论,又掌握动手实践的技能的有效路径。     

VARIETY OF METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH IN ECONOMICS

Abstract.  It has been argued by some that the distinction between orthodox economics and heterodox economics does not fit the growing variety in economic theory, unified by a common methodological approach. On the other hand, it remains a central characteristic of heterodox economics that it does not share this methodological approach, but rather represents a range of alternative methodological approaches. The paper explores the evidence, and arguments, for variety in economics at different levels, and a range of issues which arise. This requires in turn a discussion of the meaning of variety in economics at the different levels of reality, methodology, method and theory. It is concluded that there is scope for more, rather than less, variety in economic methodologies, as well as within methodologies. Further, if variety is not to take the form of 'anything goes', then critical discussion by economists of different approaches to economics, and of variety itself, is required.     

Catholic Social Thought and New Institutional Economics: An Assessment of Their Affinities and Areas of Potential Convergence

The potential link between Catholic social teaching (CST) and the theoretical developments associated with new institutional economics (NIE) are explored. The emphasis is on the contributions of two Nobel Prize winners in economics—Douglass C. North and Elinor Ostrom—and on the work of political scientist Vincent Ostrom. By adjusting the neoclassical presumptions dominating modern economic theory to include culture, ideas, and religious beliefs in the analysis of economic behavior, the economic and social theorizing developed by these scholars advances a framework that has significant affinities with CST’s foundational critique of economic concepts and theories and with its normative position regarding the nature and functioning of social and economic systems.     

The Changing Relationship Between Economic Sociology and Institutional Economics

A bstract In his early work. Talcott Parsons severely criticized Old Institutional Economists like Thorstein Veblen and Clarence Ayres. Parsons'main objection was that institutional economics had a misconceived view on the scope of economics: institutions, being the embodiment of values, were the proper subject of sociology rather than economics. By arguing for a clear-cut division of labor between economics and sociology. Parsons legitimated the divide between the two disciplines that came into being in the years to follow. Recently however, the relationship between economic-sociology and institutional economics has changed dramatically. New Economic Sociology (advocated by scholars like Mark Granovetter and Richard Swedberig) rejects the division of labor proposed by Parsons. By-providing substitutes rather than just complements to economics, it tries to counter economic imperialism. This creates significant similarities between New Economic Sociology, Old Institutional Economics and the recent return of institutionalism in economic theory. However, the quest for a division of labor between economics and sociology remains unfinished.     

TOWARDS AN ALGORITHMIC REVOLUTION IN ECONOMIC THEORY

Abstract This is an attempt to tell a coherent story of a possible path towards an algorithmic revolution in economic theory, based on foundational debates in mathematics. First, by exposing the non‐computational content of classical mathematics, and its foundations, it is shown that both set theory and the tertium non datur can be dispensed with, as foundational concepts. Next, then, as a natural sequel, it follows that every kind of economic theory that bases its theoretical underpinning on classical mathematics can be freed from these foundations and can be made naturally algorithmic. This will make the subject face, in an all pervasive way, absolutely (algorithmically) undecidable decision problems. The thrust of the path towards an algorithmic revolution in economics lies, then, in pointing out that only a radically new mathematical vision of microeconomics, macroeconomics, behavioural economics, game theory, dynamical systems theory and probability theory can lead us towards making economic theory a meaningfully applied science and free of mysticism and subjectivism.     

Culture in Neoinstitutional Economics: An Integration of Myrdal and Galbraith into the Veblen-Ayres Matrix

A bstract . Neoinstitutional economics , exemplified in this instance by the contributions of Gunnaar Myrdal and John K. Galbraith , exhibits a basic proclivity toward fragmentation. It is argued that a further advance of the Veblen-Ayres general theory of economic development will serve as the foundation to reverse such centrifugal tendencies and provide a basis for integration and synthesis. The key conceptual framework for analysis and theory resides in culture and its evolution. The core of culture is transformed through the processes of economic development fed by the dynamics of technological change. In a modified Veblen- Ayres matrix, social institutions are assumed to be integral to the organic whole of technology. Given further modifications of mainstream institutional economics contained in the "dichotomy of useful knowledge" and the "wheel of economic development," it is suggested that the cultural approaches of Myrdal and Galbraith might then be integrated into the culture-analysis of economic evolution inherent in mainstream institutional economics