AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF STOCK MARKET VALUATION OF CORPORATE PROJECTED PENSION LIABILITIES

This study extends the work of Landsman (1986) by making use of the newly available projected benefit pension obligations (PBO) information. Our analysis documents that investors perceive pension assets and pension liabilities, respectively, as corporate assets and liabilities. We also developed and tested a decomposition model of pension obligations by examining the market valuation of the three components of PBO: vested, non-vested and future salary progression. Our results indicate that future salary progression is indeed considered by market participants as a liability of the firm. The results of the study have important implications for accounting policy making.     

CORPORATE TAKEOVER BARRIERS: VALUATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE

This study provides additional evidence on the share price effect of takeover barriers such as antitakeover charter amendments, dual classes of common stock, and poison pill plans. The share price reaction to the construction of takeover barriers is found to be negative but insignificant. However, when disaggregated by type, significant negative share price reactions are found on construction of poison pill plans. New evidence on the possible relationship between firm performance and takeover barrier construction is also presented. The results of this study suggest that management of 'efficiently-run' firms may construct takeover barriers to deter value-diminishing takeovers.     

CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The conceptualization of assets and liabilities is fundamental to an understanding of financial accounting. It is often maintained that assets and liabilities represent economic resources and economic obligations, respectively, but that not all economic resources are assets and not all economic obligations are liabilities — a somewhat confusing state of affairs. This paper presents a schema for distinguishing assets from economic resources and liabilities from economic obligations based on the authoritative literature in the United States, Australia, Canada and Great Britain. The schema should be useful for clarifying certain financial accounting controversies concerning income taxes, leases, pension benefit payments and executory contracts.