技术商业2011

对于所有技术和商业领域内的相关利益者而言,2011年注定将是一个重要的转折点。其转折意义的一大表征,是这一年会成为应用元年,各种包含复杂属性的应用将进入一个爆发式的增长期;第二大表征,即是一种崭新的技术交融时代到来。2011年真正与众不同的地方在于,那些颠覆性的技术最终会相互融合,例如云和移动、移动和社交网络、社交网络和‘海量数据’以及实时分析等。IDC高级副总裁兼首席分析师Frank Gens的观点,基本体现了风投界和分析机构对明年信息技术产业走势的预测和判断。     

技术商业2009

2009年,对于绝大多数企业和投资者来说,可能是更难熬的一年。恰好80年前,也是一个大萧条时代的开始,人们在经历了一个漫长的低谷徘徊期和一场惨烈的世界大战后,     

技术商业宣言

又到了一个十字路口——在全球经济衰退的压力中,商业文明如何走出低谷,持续发展？又到了一个艰难时刻——中国改革开放走过30多年粗放式发展历程,目前陷入结构性发展困难阶段,如何才能找到破解的钥匙？我们必须做出回答——找到新的圣火与源动力,推动商业、社会、文明持续创新发展!我们必须有所为——改革一旦停滞或倒退,后果将不堪设想!     

技术商业2007

这个世界的发展总是出乎我们的意料,很重要的原因在于推动世界发展的各个因素总是很难同步、合拍。融合(convergence)在几年前就是一个响亮的口号,但是直到最近,各种因素好像才逐渐就位,在几个层面上融合的趋势日渐显现出来。从技术层面看,以IP技术为基础,通信技术和IT技术已经呈现出了迅速融合的态势,用户和厂商都采取了更加积极的态度去面对;而在应用层面,多种通信方式和技术的融合,集中表现为终端的融合。几年前,商务通那句响亮的口号“呼机、手机、商务通,一个都不能少”,已经在这个信息泛滥的社会里被很多更加方便、快捷地上传图片和…     

技术决定商业变革

数字技术渗透到了价值创造的每一个维度,众多被技术改变甚至颠覆的行业,同时也在爆发着无穷的机会。19621962年发明狂人冲击连锁业10100010010当别的企业还为"信息化"钻牛角尖的时候,山姆.沃尔顿已花费2400万美元建造了一颗人造卫星,并于1983年发射升空和启用,果断将"信息化"转化为沃尔玛的效率。山姆给连锁业带来的改革不计其数,他发明了条形码、     

技术商业2012粘稠世界

在越来越广泛连接的时代中,一个越来越粘稠的商业世界正呼啸而来。生活在瑞士日内瓦的爱德华·贝尔已经从事了十几年的轨道巡检工作,正在发生着静悄悄的变化一一无论是他巡检的对象,抑或是工作方式。敲击,这个自他开始工作以来重复过无数次的动作,将在不久之后从他的工作中彻底消失。     

技术狂人的商业重生

高精尖技术背后隐藏的巨大商业风险使得宋世鹏的核心技术几乎无人问津,于是这个技术专家只好很不情愿地自己创业。注册资金不过1000万元人民币,今年才开始实质性市场运作的中国民营企业——上海伽玛星科技发展有限公司居然跃入全球著名风险投资业媒体——美国《红鲱鱼》(RedHerring)杂志的“法眼”:上个月月底,上海伽玛星科技发展有限公司作为中国医疗设备研发生产企业的唯一代表,入围《红鲱鱼》在香港宣布的第二届“亚洲优秀未上市公司100强”名单。上海伽玛星的创建者事实上就是目前拥有90多项医疗专利技术,被业界称为“中国伽玛刀之父”…     

技术商业的变革之路

全球经济形式快速变化,持续调整,市场竞争态势扑朔迷离。在商业快速变革的同时,我们也进入了技术井喷的年代。云计算、大数据、ICT融合、移动应用、社交网络等技术浪潮的不断演进,带来了全新的信息社会,个人或组织,传统的商业形态或商业逻辑,都在快速改变中。技术企业们在急剧变革的经济形势中,不断创新,希望通过改变客户的商业,来改变自己的商业。面对严峻的市场竞争态势和改变中的客户,传统企业们正在思考应当为自己植入怎样的技术基因。谁能先于竞争对手,拥抱变革,做出改变,在竞争中抓到先机呢?在2013中国CIO高峰论坛期间,《IT经理世界》对话业界主流IT企业,探讨技术商业的变革之路。     

郭为的技术商业观

以移动互联网和云计算为代表的新技术革命在如何影响着商业和社会的变革？我们来聆听神州数码控股有限公司董事局主席郭为的观念分享。     

2008高科技高成长50

今年高科技领域成长最快的企业是哪一家?来自江苏江阴的浚鑫科技以3年34706%的成长率排在50强的头名。在全球市场需求旺盛之时,作为国内领先的太阳能光伏电池和组件设计者,浚鑫科技立足国内,不断向市场前端延展,如今已经在西班牙和德国修建了十几座太阳能发电站。     

技术商业2010影响下一个十年的6大技术关键词

在一个新十年的门口,乐观的人觉得自己看到了复苏的曙光,《终于再见了,地狱里的十年》——《时代》周刊2009年12月初刊发的一篇文章中     

Technology Sharing in Manufacturing Business Groups

Technology represents the primordial force for companies and organizations in securing long‐term competitiveness. In the intensive search to access new technology, organizations are more and more looking beyond the borders of the focal firm and becoming involved in various networks with suppliers, consultants, partners, and others. However, the distinction between the focal firm, on the one hand, and networks, on the other, is in this paper argued to be too extensive without intermediating nuances. Less focus is given to an in‐between perspective configured by business groups or concerns here defined as parent corporations with subsidiary companies. It is this perspective of business groups with characteristics between individual firms and open networks that is of interest in this paper. The focus is on manufacturing business groups in which the companies will typically have individual as well as common technologies. The research aim is to develop a framework to be used as an analytical tool for understanding and organizing technology sharing in manufacturing business groups. The research approach was to study technology sharing in a natural setting combining multiple in‐depth sources of evidence in a clinical research setting. A prestudy identified key dimensions in classifying cases leading to four clusters of typified cases. Data were gathered from meetings with 24 managers from various research and development (R&D) units who met regularly every other week during seven months, in‐depth interviews, internal documents and protocols, and workshops. Following the clinical field‐study approach, findings are theoretically validated in relation to literature. The analysis identifies and depicts four different types of technology‐sharing scenarios in manufacturing business groups. Each type has particular characteristics of its own. The four scenarios together provide a synthesized portfolio with different types of dimensions. A first dimension makes a distinction between sharing new technology development versus existing technology. Another distinguishes between technologies aimed at the whole business group and those aimed at specific segments. The two dimensions together comprise four different types of technology‐sharing alternatives. Each one of them can be used at the focal firm, and together, they are applicable from a business group perspective comprising technology‐sharing portfolios of manufacturing business groups.     

技术竞争中商业模式的作用

在知识经济时代,技术革新日新月异,企业之间的技术竞争也愈演愈烈,渐渐演变为标准竞争。然而,技术的经济价值只是潜在的,只有通过合适的商业模式才能将其充分释放出来,从而为企业带来巨大的经济效益,乃至实现持久的竞争优势。以企业技术竞争中所采取的商业模式为研究对象,利用切萨布鲁夫提出的商业模式六维度分析框架,运用多重案例研究的方法探讨商业模式在企业技术竞争中的重要作用。通过对案例分析结果的归纳和总结,为商业模式理论提供了新的观点,也能够为标准竞争中的企业提供有益的启发。     

多种方法集成的企业技术预见研究

本文基于预测市场和 S 曲线理论两种技术预见理论,通过预测市场在西门子和惠普两大公司的运用,凸显出了预测市场的优缺点;另外,通过 S 曲线描述了柯达公司的兴衰趋势以及其对手富士公司的成功转型,这其中也体现 S 曲线的可靠性和不足。同时,借鉴富士公司及很多优秀公司的成功逆袭,也使得作者把两种预见技术进行有机融合,取长补短,帮助企业更为准确预测其技术的发展趋势,抢先把握企业的核心竞争力,为企业长远的发展做好充分准备。     

热敏CTP技术与市场商机

热敏成像技术是在CTP领域中应用的两大主流技术之一,近几年其风头大有压过可见光成像技术的趋势。作为从事感光材料研究的科技人员,作者从多个角度分析了热敏CTP技术受到业内人士推崇的原因。在此基础上,作者进一步分析了热敏CTP技术在国际、国内市场中的发展状况,并预测了热敏CTP技术的未来市场与商机。     

PERSPECTIVE: Ranking Business Schools on the Management of Technology

Current centers of active research on the management of technology and innovation (MOT) are identified through the use of a publication‐based study. This article develops a methodology for ranking centers of MOT research and in doing so identifies 120 centers of MOT research in different parts of the world. Centers of research are identified in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Detailed assessment is offered for the 21 U.S.‐based schools with three or more active MOT researchers present. The nature and quality of research activity is assessed with a series of 21 metrics. These metrics consider the number of active faculty, the number of publications researchers have in the base journals during the study period, total publication history, MOT publication history, number of equivalent articles, number of pages published, frequency of citations, and a series of metrics that are a combination of two or more of these factors. The assessment identifies four groups of schools that have MOT research capabilities. Schools with substantial research capability are divided into three tiers based on their rankings in different metrics. Each of the schools ranked in the first tier placed first on at least two of the 21 metrics considered in this study. A reasonable argument can be made that any one of the schools ranking in the first tier is the strongest school in terms of MOT research capabilities. These U.S.‐based schools in alphabetical order are Georgia Tech, MIT, Rensselaer, Rutgers, and Stanford. An important point to note is that there are clear differences in research focus between the different first‐tier schools; therefore, it is quite likely that different types of students, faculties, and practitioners will find each of the first‐tier schools most attractive based on personal fit with these differences in specialization. The schools in the second and third tier have substantial MOT research capability. The fourth tier identifies 18 additional U.S.‐based schools that have some capability due to a core of two researchers. This core could be the springboard to a national ranking or a transitory state due to departure of a faculty member. Future research should consider the stability of the results over time and should explore the links among research capabilities, program structure, student output, and placement.     

航天发射技术及特种车事业部

航天发射技术及特种车事业部是中国运载火箭技术研究院直属的国有经营实体,以航天发射技术为依托,管理和运营特种车和地面设备相关资源。特种车事业部设有总部、研发设计、总装