Continua of stochastic dominance relations for unbounded probability distributions

Let P = {F,G,…} be the set of all probability distribution functions with support (0, ∞). An unrestricted stochastic dominance relation>_∞ is defined on P for each real ∞ 1, where F >_∞ G means that ^x_y = 0 (x - y)^{∞ - 1} dG(y) ^x_{n = 0}(x − y)^∞−1 dG(y) for all ∞ 0, with < for some x. These relations are partial orders that increase as ∞ increases with limit relation>_∞. A class U_∞ of utility functions u on (0, ∞) is defined in such a way that F >_∞ G iff udF > udG for all u ε U_∞. The U_∞ decrease as ∞ increases and have a non-empty intersection U_∞. Each u ε U_∞ is an increasing function that has derivatives of all orders that alternate in sign. Criteria which tell when F eventually dominates G in the sense of F >_∞ G are noted. Comparisons with bounded stochastic dominance results are made in several places.     

Structural instability of the core

Let σ be a q-rule, where any coalition of size q, from the society of size n, is decisive. Let w(n,q)= 2q-n+1 and let W be a smooth ‘policy space’ of dimension w. Let U(W)^N be the space of all smooth profiles on W, endowed with the Whitney topology. It is shown that there exists an ‘instability dimension’ w^*(σ) with 2w^*(σ)w(n,q) such that:

1. (i) if ww^*(σ), and W has no boundary, then the core of σ is empty for a dense set of profiles in U(W)^N (i.e., almost always),

2. (ii) if ww^*(σ)+1, and W has a boundary, then the core of σ is empty, almost always,

3. (iii) if ww^*(σ)+1 then the cycle set is dense in W, almost always,

4. (iv) if ww^*(σ)+2 then the cycle set is also path connected, almost always.

The method of proof is first of all to show that if a point belongs to the core, then certain generalized symmetry conditions in terms of ‘pivotal’ coalitions of size 2q−n must be satisfied. Secondly, it is shown that these symmetry conditions can almost never be satisfied when either W has empty boundary and is of dimension w(n,q) or when W has non-empty boundary and is of dimension w(n,q)+1.     

Some Determinants of Property Crime: Economic Factors Influence Criminal Behavior But Cannot Completely Explain the Syndrome

Abstract . An empirical analysis of the property crimes, robbery, burglary and larceny, is presented for all 120 counties in Kentucky. While this analysis is based on an economic model of crime, certain sociological and legal variables are included as well in the system of equations. Overall, the empirical results support prior studies’findings with the exception that a quadratic relationship is found to exist between urbanization and each of the property crimes. Furthermore, neither the economic nor the non economic influences measured appear more important for affecting crime rates. Specifically, results indicate that the level of poverty, the degree of tourism, the presence of police, the unemployment rate and the apprehension rate all affect property crimes. In contrast, the length of sentence, the degree of industrialization, the level of public assistance payments and the proportion of youth in the county have no affect on property crime rates in these areas.     

What Is the Economic Meaning of FDH?

The central feature of the FDH model is the lack of convexity for its production possibility set, TF. Starting with n observed (distinct) decision making units DMU_k , each defined by an input-output vector p _k = [y _k -x _k], domination is defined by ordinary vector inequalities. DMU_k is said to dominate DMU_j if p _k ≥ p _j , p _k ≠ p _j . The FDH production possibility set TF consists of the observed DMU_j together with all input-output vectors p=[y_k,?x_k] with y ≥ 0, x ≥ 0, y ≠ 0, x ≠ 0 which are dominated by at least one of the observed DMU_j. DMU_k is defined as “FDH efficient” if no DMU_j dominates it. In the BCC (or variable return to scale) DEA model the production possibility set TB consists of the observed DMU_k together with all input-output vectors dominated by any convex combination of them and DMU_k is DEA efficient if it is not dominated by any p in TB. In the DEA model, economic meaning is established by the introduction of (non negative) multiplier (price) vectors w = [u,v]. If DMU_k is undominated (in TB) then there exists a positive multiplier vector w for which (a) w ^T p _k = u ^T y _k ? v ^T x _k ≥ w ^T p for every p ∈ TB. In everyday language, the net return (or profit) for DMU_k relative to the given multiplier vector w is at least as great as that for any production possibility p. On the other hand, if DMU_k is FDH but not DEA efficient then it is proved that there exists no positive multiplier vector >w for which (a) holds, i.e. for any positive w there exists at least one DMU_j for which w ^T p _j > w^T p _k . Since, therefore, FDH efficiency does not guarantee price efficiency what is its economic significance? Without economic significance, how can FDH be considered as being more than a mathematical system however logically soundly it may be conceived?

     

Multivariate likelihood ratio orderings between spacings of heterogeneous exponential random variables

Let X ₁, X ₂, ..., X _n be independent exponential random variables such that X _i has failure rate λ for i = 1, ..., p and X _j has failure rate λ^* for j = p + 1, ..., n, where p ≥ 1 and q = n − p ≥ 1. Denote by D _i:n (p,q) = X _i:n −X _i-1:n the ith spacing of the order statistics X _1:n ≤ X _2:n ≤ ... ≤ X _n:n , i = 1, ..., n, where X _0:n ≡ 0. The purpose of this paper is to investigate multivariate likelihood ratio orderings between spacings D _i:n (p,q), generalizing univariate comparison results in Wen et al.(J Multivariate Anal 98:743–756, 2007). We also point out that such multivariate likelihood ratio orderings do not hold for order statistics instead of spacings. Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No.: NCET-04-0569), and by the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.: KJCX3-SYW-S02).     

Characterization of the multivariate normal distribution by conditional normal distributions

Summary LetX andY be two random vectors with values in ℝ ^k and ℝ∝, respectively. IfZ=(X ^T,Y ^T) ^T is multivariate normal thenX givenY=y andY givenX=x are (multivariate) normal; the converse is wrong. In this paper simple additional conditions are stated such that the converse is true, too. Furthermore, the case is treated that the random vectorZ=(X ₁ ^T , …,X _t ^T ) ^T is splitted intot≥3 partsX ₁, …,X _t.     

Moment consistency of estimators in partially linear models under NA samples

Consider the heteroscedastic regression model Y ^(j)(x _in , t _in ) = t _in β + g(x _in ) + σ _in e ^(j)(x _in ), 1 ≤ j ≤ m, 1 ≤ i ≤ n, where s_in²=f(u_in){\sigma_{in}^{2}=f(u_{in})}, (x _in , t _in , u _in ) are fixed design points, β is an unknown parameter, g(·) and f(·) are unknown functions, and the errors {e ^(j)(x _in )} are mean zero NA random variables. The moment consistency for least-squares estimators and weighted least-squares estimators of β is studied. In addition, the moment consistency for estimators of g(·) and f(·) is investigated.     

On a linear stochastic differential equation

Summary Stochastic differential (s. d.) equations had been considered in [Nasr, 1960] and [Nasr]. We consider here, the s. d. equationf(D)x(t)=m(t)+v(t)z(t) wherem(t),v(t) are real functions oft,f(D) is a polynomial inD withD=d/dt, andz(t) is a random function. In particular,z(t) is assumed here, to be of the stationary type, while other types namely whenz(t) is of theGaussian or of thePoisson type, are considered in [Nasr]. A particular integral of the stated equation, and an associated covariance function of this integral are given in the form of generalized (g-)functions; [Nasr, 1965]. The equationdx/dt=v(t)z(t) wherez(t) is stationary in the wide sense is considered as a special case.     

Botswana's Macroeconomic Management of Its Mineral-Based Growth: It Used Mining Revenues for Development and Services but Must Now Broaden the Beneficiaries

Abstract . The economic performance and the political history of Botswana during 1974-84 contrasted significantly with the experience of virtually every other African country. The South African republic, immediately north of the Republic of South Africa, achieved steady real economic growth with improved social services and provision for its people's basic needs. This was achieved in spite of world recession and drought because its mineral wealth Was reserved for the people and mining companies had to pay for the privilege of extracting that wealth through a tax program limited to appropriating its surplus, while assuring the investors and entrepreneurs an adequate long-term return on capital and enterprise. But sound macroeconomic policies failed to provide even reasonably equitable benefits for the majority of the people. Sound micropolicies are needed to widen access to employment and earned income and to asset accumulation.     

Games of chance with multiple objectives

We consider games of chance between two players: Player M can win only by amassing point totals in several categories before player N scores a prescribed total number n of points. Let M have k objectives, with m _i points required in category i and probability q _i of scoring a point in that category. We resolve certain special cases: (a) For all m _i equal, the probabilities of M winning are ordered by majorization of the vectors (q ₁,...,q _k ). (b) For all q _i equal, the probabilities of M winning are ordered by majorization of the vectors (m ₁,...,m _k ). (c) For all m _i equal and all q _i equal, the probability of M winning approaches 0 as n → ∞ or as k → ∞. The results, which follow from inequalities of majorization and Schur convexity, are in accord with intuition.      

Convergence of a branching type recursion with non-stationary immigration

The asymptotic distribution of a branching type recursion with non-stationary immigration is investigated. The recursion is given by , where (X _l ) is a random sequence, (L _n ⁻¹⁽¹⁾ ) are iid copies ofL _n−1,K is a random number andK, (L _n ⁻¹⁽¹⁾ ), {(X _l ),Y _n } are independent. This recursion has been studied intensively in the literature in the case thatX _l ≥0,K is nonrandom andY _n =0 ∀n. Cramer, Rüschendorf (1996b) treat the above recursion without immigration with starting conditionL ₀=1, and easy to handle cases of the recursion with stationary immigration (i.e. the distribution ofY _n does not depend on the timen). In this paper a general limit theorem will be deduced under natural conditions including square-integrability of the involved random variables. The treatment of the recursion is based on a contraction method. The conditions of the limit theorem are built upon the knowledge of the first two moments ofL _n . In case of stationary immigration a detailed analysis of the first two moments ofL _n leads one to consider 15 different cases. These cases are illustrated graphically and provide a straight forward means to check the conditions and to determine the operator whose unique fixed point is the limit distribution of the normalizedL _n .     

Henry George and the Classical Scientific Research Program: The Economics of Republican Millennialism

Abstract . Henry George's classicism was evident in his acceptance of “hard core” assumptions inherent in classical economic analysis, notably that rational self-interested behavior exercise in competitive markets maximized economic welfare. However, George's “stage theory,” the “Law of Human Progress,” led him to reject the classical nexus between social and economic welfare. The emergence of an exchange economy improved efficiency and economic welfare, but institutional changes lagged behind, particularly the redefinition of property rights. Consequently, economic growth based on land as a private rather than public good widened the gap between economic efficiency and social welfare. Hence George's paradox of poverty amidst progress. George resolved the equity efficiency conflict by treating land as a public good. Then, the sale of monopoly rights to land through the “single tax” on land rents captured the difference between the private and social costs of land use.     

Scharfe untere und obere Schranken für die Wahrscheinlichkeit der Realisation vonk untern Ereignissen

Summary LetA ₁,...,A _n be events in a probability space (,A,W). We denote byL _k the event, that at leastk events among then eventsA ₁,...A _n occur, and byK _k the event, that exactlyk events occur. If only the inequalities _i W(A _i ) _i ,i=1,...,n, are known, we calculate sharp lower and upper bounds forW(L _k ) andW(K _k ). These bounds only depend onn, k and _i , _i ,i=1,...,n. They are relevant, when treating combined tests or confidence procedures.     

On the upper and lower semicontinuity of the Aumann integral

Let (T,τ,μ) be a finite measure space, X be a Banach space, P be a metric space and let L₁(μ,X) denote the space of equivalence classes of X-valued Bochner integrable functions on (T,τ,μ). We show that if φ:T×P→2^X is a set-valued function such that for each fixed pεP, φ(·,p) has a measurable graph and for each fixed tεT, φ(t,·) is either upper or lower semicontinuous then the Aumann integral of φ, i.e.,∫_Tφ(t,p)dμ(t)= {∫_Tx(t)dμ(t):xεS_φ(p)}, where S_φ(p)= {yεL₁(μ,X):y(t)εφ(t,p)μ−a.e.}, is either upper or lower semicontinuous in the variable p as well. Our results generalize those of Aumann (1965, 1976) who has considered the above problem for X=Rⁿ, and they have useful applications in general equilibrium and game theory.     

Two-sample rank tests with truncated populations

LetX ₁,…,X _m andY ₁,…,Y _n be two independent samples from continuous distributionsF andG respectively. Using a Hoeffding (1951) type theorem, we obtain the distributions of the vector S=(S ₍₁₎,…,S _(n)), whereS _(j)=# (X _i ’s≤Y _(j)) andY _(j) is thej-th order statistic ofY sample, under three truncation models: (a)G is a left truncation ofF orG is a right truncation ofF, (b)F is a right truncation ofH andG is a left truncation ofH, whereH is some continuous distribution function, (c)G is a two tail truncation ofF. Exploiting the relation between S and the vectorR of the ranks of the order statistics of theY-sample in the pooled sample, we can obtain exact distributions of many rank tests. We use these to compare powers of the Hajek test (Hajek 1967), the Sidak Vondracek test (1957) and the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. We derive some order relations between the values of the probagility-functions under each model. Hence find that the tests based onS ₍₁₎ andS _(n) are the UMP rank tests for the alternative (a). We also find LMP rank tests under the alternatives (b) and (c).     

On optimal operation of a jointly owned enterprise

An enterprise is owned jointly by m agents, the ith agent's share being θ_i > 0 where ∑_iθ_i=1. The enterprise is able to produce some non-negative n-vector x of goods where x lies in some convex production set X. An operation consists of choosing a vector from X and distributing it among the agents. The problem is to find an operations such that the value of the ith agent's bundle measured in a given price system is proportional to θ_i and such that the operation is (Pareto) optimal with respect to the agent's preferences. It is shown under standard assumptions that operations which are both optimal and proportional always exist. It is also shown that these operations are unique if (a) X is given by a separable production function, and (b) when X represents production of a single good over n time periods.     

Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: a Reference Approach

For any probability model M={p(x|θ, ω), θεΘ, ωεΩ} assumed to describe the probabilistic behaviour of data xεX, it is argued that testing whether or not the available data are compatible with the hypothesis H₀={θ=θ₀} is best considered as a formal decision problem on whether to use (a₀), or not to use (a₀), the simpler probability model (or null model) M₀={p(x|θ₀, ω), ωεΩ}, where the loss difference L(a₀, θ, ω) –L(a₀, θ, ω) is proportional to the amount of information δ(θ₀, ω), which would be lost if the simplified model M₀ were used as a proxy for the assumed model M. For any prior distribution π(θ, ω), the appropriate normative solution is obtained by rejecting the null model M₀ whenever the corresponding posterior expectation ∫∫δ(θ₀, θ, ω)π(θ, ω|x)dθdω is sufficiently large. Specification of a subjective prior is always difficult, and often polemical, in scientific communication. Information theory may be used to specify a prior, the reference prior, which only depends on the assumed model M, and mathematically describes a situation where no prior information is available about the quantity of interest. The reference posterior expectation, d(θ₀, x) =∫δπ(δ|x)dδ, of the amount of information δ(θ₀, θ, ω) which could be lost if the null model were used, provides an attractive nonnegative test function, the intrinsic statistic, which is invariant under reparametrization. The intrinsic statistic d(θ₀, x) is measured in units of information, and it is easily calibrated (for any sample size and any dimensionality) in terms of some average log‐likelihood ratios. The corresponding Bayes decision rule, the Bayesian reference criterion (BRC), indicates that the null model M₀ should only be rejected if the posterior expected loss of information from using the simplified model M₀ is too large or, equivalently, if the associated expected average log‐likelihood ratio is large enough. The BRC criterion provides a general reference Bayesian solution to hypothesis testing which does not assume a probability mass concentrated on M₀ and, hence, it is immune to Lindley's paradox. The theory is illustrated within the context of multivariate normal data, where it is shown to avoid Rao's paradox on the inconsistency between univariate and multivariate frequentist hypothesis testing.     

Some properties of the minimum and the maximum of random variables with joint logconcave distributions

It is shown that if (X ₁, X ₂, . . . , X _n ) is a random vector with a logconcave (logconvex) joint reliability function, then X _P = min _i∈P X _i has increasing (decreasing) hazard rate. Analogously, it is shown that if (X ₁, X ₂, . . . , X _n ) has a logconcave (logconvex) joint distribution function, then X ^P  = max _i∈P X _i has decreasing (increasing) reversed hazard rate. If the random vector is absolutely continuous with a logconcave density function, then it has a logconcave reliability and distribution functions and hence we obtain a result given by Hu and Li (Metrika 65:325–330, 2007). It is also shown that if (X ₁, X ₂, . . . , X _n ) has an exchangeable logconcave density function then both X _P and X ^P have increasing likelihood ratio.     

Explaining the American Dream: Telling Chinese Academics What'Liberty and Justice For All'Means Taxes Even an Eager Audience

Abstract . For more than a generation, contemporary mainland Chinese have lived under first a military dictatorship and now a political party dictatorship. How to explain to an eager Chinese academic audience what the American dream of ‘liberty and justice for all’—realized only in part in some areas but approached progressively nearer in others—really means? The U.S. has predominantly a capitalist system but its people are committed to equality of opportunity. It tempers ‘rugged individualism’ by concern for the poor, the handicapped and the unfortunate. It has many serious economic, social and cultural problems but its citizens, drawn from most of the peoples of the world—not the special interest groups trying to benefit at the expense of others—are determined to solve them equitably and rationally. The trade and budget deficits are related to government instrumentalities.     

A bound on the expected overshoot for some concave boundaries

LetX ₁,X ₂,… be i.i.d. with finite meanμ>0,S _n =X ₁+…+X _n . Forf(n)=n ^β ,c>0 we consider the stopping timesT _c =inf{n:S _n >c+f(n)} with overshootR _c =S _{T c} −(c+f(T _c )). For 0<β<1 we give a bound for sup _c≥0 ER _c in the spirit of Lorden’s well-known inequality forf=0.