THE FUNDAMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF TRADING VOLUME REACTION TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION: EVIDENCE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPIRICAL CAPITAL MARKET RESEARCH

Prior empirical research indicates that trading volume reaction to new information increases with the heterogeneity of investors’ prior beliefs. We examine three potential factors that theoretical models of financial economists show determine trading volume reaction to new information: heterogeneous prior beliefs, differential interpretation, and the consensus effect—the extent to which the information causes their beliefs to converge or diverge. We find that these three factors have a distinct and significant incremental effect on trading volume, thereby suggesting that empirical trading volume models that exclude or fail to control for any of these determinants are misspecified with biased estimated coefficients.     

DETERMINANTS OF ACCOUNTING POLICY CHOICE IN THE AUSTRALIAN PROPERTY INDUSTRY: A PORTFOLIO APPROACH

The objective of this research is to explain accounting policy choice in the Australian property industry by reference to costly contracting theory. This paper makes three departures from the predominant literature. First, instead of focusing on a single policy choice, it focuses on a portfolio of 15 choices. Second, instead of measuring each policy choice dichotomously, it measures the dollar effect of each policy choice. Finally, the research focuses on the impact of policy choices on owners' equity as well as income. The results confirm the importance of compensation arrangements as a determinant of accounting policy choice but fail to provide evidence that debt constraints or political costs are significant determinants of accounting policy choice. These results suggest that including property firms in a more heterogeneous sample may reduce the power of tests on the debt constraints and political costs hypotheses. More generally (when compared to previous research) the results suggest that the determinants of policy choice are likely to be industry specific.     

当前我国农村金融市场主体行为研究

当前以及今后一个相当长的时期,中国农村的生产要素市场中,各生产要素的供给与需求的约束是各不相同的,因而在政策层面上的表现也各不相同.与耕地、劳动力和技术相比,资金要素则有其特殊性.说农村中资金短缺,但又有大量资金流入城市,而且净流出的数额非常大;说资金充裕,又有许多农户因缺少资金,家庭经营只能维持简单再生产,高利贷也很普及.因此,正确认识和深入研究当前农村金融市场主体的经济行为,能够帮助各类金融机构更好地利用资金要素,推动农业产业结构和农村经济结构的调整,使农村生产要素的配置更合理、更有效率,以期达到稳定农产品供给和增加农民收入的目的.     

A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF DESIGN ISSUES IN MEDICAL SAVINGS ACCOUNTS: THE POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Abstract: Numerous methods for helping consumers deal with medical care costs have been suggested. One way that has been discussed is the use of Medical Saving Accounts. A pilot program introducing Medical Spending Accounts was passed by Congress as part of the Health Insurance Reform Act of 1996. The authors review the major points of this program and attempt to examine what impact this program could have on medical care cost.     

THE ENERGY MLP GOES INSTITUTIONAL: IMPLICATIONS FOR STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE

Master limited partnerships (MLPs) were popular in the 1980s because of the favorable tax treatment of their cash distributions. But since the Revenue Act of 1987, which imited the lines of business and income sources for which this tax treatment was available, virtually all remaining public MLPs have been in natural resource businesses.
Institutional investors have traditionally avoided investing in master limited partnerships because any cash distributions must be treated as unrelated business income, creating an immediate tax liability. But in an innovative underwriting in May 001, Goldman Sachs offered shares in a limited liability company that would pay stock dividends equivalent to the cash distributions on its proportional ownership interest in Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, a pipeline operator. In effect, this structure allows tax-exempt investors (institutions) to own an interest in Kinder Morgan Energy Partners without triggering unrelated business taxable income.
An interesting aspect of this recent development is that while the MLP was originally viewed as a vehicle for slow-growth firms to distribute cash and wind down operations, the "institutional" MLP could be used to facilitate growth by attracting needed investment to businesses currently housed in MLP form—typically energy transportation and storage infrastructure businesses (so-called "mid-stream" energy assets). The new structure raises some potential corporate governance challenges in that it is highly complex and offers investors only limited control rights. But the authors' conclusion is that the institutional MLP is likely to be a successful financing innovation whose tax-favored status and extensive public disclosure will outweigh any governance concerns.