Treatment effects in sample selection models and their nonparametric estimation

In a sample-selection model with the ‘selection’ variable Q$Q$ and the ‘outcome’ variable Y^∗$Y^{\ast }$, Y^∗$Y^{\ast }$ is observed only when Q=1$Q=1$. For a treatment D$D$ affecting both Q$Q$ and Y^∗$Y^{\ast }$, three effects are of interest: ‘participation  ’ (i.e., the selection) effect of D$D$ on Q$Q$, ‘visible performance  ’ (i.e., the observed outcome) effect of D$D$ on Y≡QY^∗$Y\equiv Q{Y}^{\ast }$, and ‘invisible performance  ’ (i.e., the latent outcome) effect of D$D$ on Y^∗$Y^{\ast }$. This paper shows the conditions under which the three effects are identified, respectively, by the three corresponding mean differences of Q$Q$, Y$Y$, and Y|Q=1$Y|Q=1$ (i.e., Y^∗|Q=1$Y^{\ast }|Q=1$) across the control (D=0$D=0$) and treatment (D=1$D=1$) groups. Our nonparametric estimators for those effects adopt a two-sample framework and have several advantages over the usual matching methods. First, there is no need to select the number of matched observations. Second, the asymptotic distribution is easily obtained. Third, over-sampling the control/treatment group is allowed. Fourth, there is a built-in mechanism that takes into account the ‘non-overlapping support problem’, which the usual matching deals with by choosing a ‘caliper’. Fifth, a sensitivity analysis to gauge the presence of unobserved confounders is available. A simulation study is conducted to compare the proposed methods with matching methods, and a real data illustration is provided.     

Quasi ML estimation of the panel AR(1) model with arbitrary initial conditions

In this paper we show that the Quasi ML estimation method yields consistent Random and Fixed Effects estimators for the autoregression parameter ρ$\rho$ in the panel AR(1) model with arbitrary initial conditions and possibly time-series heteroskedasticity even when the error components are drawn from heterogeneous distributions. We investigate both analytically and by means of Monte Carlo simulations the properties of the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$. The RE(Q)MLE for ρ$\rho$ is asymptotically at least as robust to individual heterogeneity and, when the data are i.i.d. and normal, at least as efficient as the FE(Q)MLE for ρ$\rho$. Furthermore, the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$ only suffer from a ‘weak moment conditions’ problem when ρ$\rho$ is close to one if the cross-sectional average of the variances of the errors is (almost) constant over time, e.g. under time-series homoskedasticity. However, in this case the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$ are still consistent when ρ$\rho$ is local to or equal to one although they converge to a non-normal possibly asymmetric distribution at a rate that is lower than N^1/2$N^{1/2}$ but at least N^1/4$N^{1/4}$. Finally, we study the finite sample properties of two types of estimators for the standard errors of the QML estimators for ρ$\rho$, and the bounds of QML based confidence intervals for ρ$\rho$.