Valuing real options using implied binomial trees and commodity futures options

A real option on a commodity is valued using an implied binomial tree (IBT) calibrated using commodity futures options prices. Estimating an IBT in the absence of spot options (the norm for commodities) allows real option models to be calibrated for the first time to market‐implied probability distributions for commodity prices. In addition, the existence of long‐dated futures options means that good volatility estimates may now be incorporated into capital budgeting evaluations of real options projects with long planning horizons. An example is given using gold futures options and a real option to extract gold from a mine. A detailed out‐of‐sample test is included that shows how IBT option pricing errors evolve on subtrees emanating from future levels of the underlying asset. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 27:203–226, 2007     

石油期货价格与交易头寸的关系分析

本文采用多空头寸比值的新处理方法,保持了头寸变化的方向。研究发现:石油期货价格引导了投资资金顺势而为,是推动两种期货交易净头寸变动的格兰杰原因;两类期货交易净头寸不是推动或平抑石油价格的手段,两类场内期货交易者都是价格接受者,其交易活动不能成为石油期货价格变动的显著推动力,说明石油期货市场并没有因为投机而失去价格发现功能。     

Estimating financial risk measures for futures positions: A nonparametric approach

This study presents nonparametric estimates of spectral risk measures (SRM) applied to long and short positions in five prominent equity futures contracts. It also compares these to estimates of two popular alternative measures, the Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. The SRMs are conditioned on the coefficient of absolute risk aversion, and the latter two are conditioned on the confidence level. Our findings indicate that all risk measures increase dramatically and their estimators deteriorate in precision when their respective conditioning parameter increases. Results also suggest that estimates of SRMs and their precision levels are of comparable orders of magnitude as those of more conventional risk measures. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 30:689–703, 2010     

Valuation of futures and commodity options with information costs

In this article, futures and commodity options are analyzed in the context of Merton's (1987) model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. First, following Dusak (1973) and Black (1976), the conditions under which Merton's model can be applied to the valuation of forward and futures contracts are proposed. Then an application to futures markets is given. We provide a partial differential equation and the formulas for European commodity options, futures contracts, and American options in the same context. The models are simulated and compared to standard models with no information costs. We find that model prices are not significantly different from standard model prices. However, our models correct for some pricing biases in standard models. In particular, they reduce the overvaluation bias for European and American commodity options. It seems that the costs of gathering and processing information regarding the option and its underlying asset play a role in explaining the biases observed in standard models. This work can be applied to other futures markets. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 19: 645–664, 1999     

Risk management with options and futures under liquidity risk

Futures hedging creates liquidity risk through marking to market. Liquidity risk matters if interim losses on a futures position have to be financed at a markup over the risk‐free rate. This study analyzes the optimal risk management and production decisions of a firm facing joint price and liquidity risk. It provides a rationale for the use of options on futures in imperfect capital markets. If liquidity risk materializes, the firm sells options on futures in order to partly cover this liquidity need. It is shown that liquidity risk reduces the optimal hedge ratio and that options are not normally used before a liquidity need actually arises. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 29:297–318, 2009