承接产业转移对区域新型工业化的影响研究——以皖江城市带为例

承接产业转移对我国区域新型工业化发展影响深远。本文以皖江城市带为例,基于层次分析法等方法,测度2004~2012年皖江城市带新型工业化水平,通过纵向和横向比较,得出承接产业转移对皖江城市带新型工业化发展的影响,积极推进皖江城市带承接产业转移走向深入。     

去工业化与鄱阳湖生态经济区建设研究

去工业化主要指以就业份额和产值份额不断下降而体现的制造业的萎缩和转移,是工业化高度发达的产物。发达国家或地区的去工业化往往意味着发展中国家或地区的工业化。鄱阳湖生态经济区作为一个后发展中地区,国内外去工业化趋势下的低碳经济、新国际劳动分工和绿色消费为其提供了难得的机遇,但也蕴含着承接产业转移的经济基础薄弱、产业风险巨大以及市场失灵与政府干预两难处境等挑战,需要加大公共宣传、优化引资环境、制定适宜的产业政策,以推动鄱阳湖生态经济区建设。     

江苏造船业应对国际造船业转移的对策

国际造船业正在加速向中国转移并给江苏造船业发展带来了良机。本文分析了江苏造船业具有承接国际造船业转移的区位优势、良好的工业基础、先进的技术条件和雄厚的船舶制造基础,提出的江苏造船业应对国际造船业转移的对策为:集群化建设,构筑大基地;集聚式发展,组建强集团;形成特色,开展错位竞争;加快发展船舶配套业,积极承接国际船舶配套业的转移;不断提升造船层次,积极承接国际高附加值船舶制造的转移。     

国际产业转移对北京产业发展的影响及对策

国际产业转移趋势为北京吸引外资提供了新的历史机遇.北京承接国际产业转移,不仅推动了服务业的发展,催化了产业结构高度化,而且有效推动了高新技术产业的成长,提高了出口结构中高附加值产品的比例.在新形势下,北京承接国际产业转移的重点领域是现代服务业、高新技术产业、环境友好型产业及前瞻性产业、先进制造业和高级制造业.为此,必须采取有效的措施,进一步拓展承接国际产业转移的发展空间.     

中部承接沿海产业转移的产业选择——以安徽为例

在区域发展战略调整和国际产业转移的背景下,沿海的传统产业出现了向中部加速迁移的趋势,安徽正面临着承接沿海产业梯度转移的重大历史机遇。根据相对产业梯度模型,以安徽、上海、江苏、浙江、广东和福建六省市为样本,对安徽承接沿海转移的目标产业进行了实证分析。安徽在饮料制造业、农副食品加工业、金属冶炼及压延加工业等传统行业和电气机械及器材制造业、交通运输设备制造业、专用设备制造业等先进制造业显示了明显的承接优势。安徽要增强对产业转移的科技支撑,促进制度创新,改善产业承接环境,以进一步提高区域产业承接绩效。     

实施战略创新打造先进电气制造业基地

建设先进制造业基地，走新型工业化道路，是浙江省委、省政府按照十六大战略决策，结合浙江实际做出的战略部署。随着经济全球化发展，发达国家制造业开始向我国进行转移，尤其长江三角洲成为了承接发达国家制造业向外转移的重要地区，我们电气行业，面临更加激烈的竞争和新的挑战，打造先进电气制造业基地，是新形势对我们提出的客观要求，每个电气企业都要积极参与。     

“先行先试”视阈下皖江城市带承接产业转移的率先发展

2010年1月12日,国务院正式的批复《皖江城市带承接产业转移示范区规划》,将皖江城市带承接产业转移示范区纳入国家战略。这是我国迄今唯一以产业转移为主题的区域规划,是国家为促进承接产业转移、加速中部崛起、协调区域发展而采取的一项"先行先试"的制度安排。"先行先试"的政策与制度安排适应了国内外发展环境的挑战。文章对此进行了探讨。     

外资产业集聚对欠发达城市工业化的影响——以韩国汽车产业对盐城转移为例

外资产业集聚与主导产业的形成可能为欠发达地区经济的成长提供一个新思路.本文在阐述韩国汽车产业对盐城转移和集聚的状况基础上,分析了汽车产业集聚与主导产业的逐步形成过程中对一个欠发达城市工业化的影响.     

高度重视广东工业的产业支撑问题

广东工业发展应以科学发展观为指导,坚持走新型工业化发展道路,积极并有选择地承接国际产业转移。     

湖南省承接产业转移的现状与效应分析

产业向我国中西部地区转移已成为当前的一种趋势,从历史的经验看,每一次产业转移都实现了承接地经济起飞的神话。湖南作为中部省份之一,被列入了此次产业了转移的重要承接区域。本文从分析了近年来湖南承接产业转移的现状,阐述了承接产业转移为湖南带来的正效应,如要素注入、产业集群发展、技术溢出与产业关联带动、社会和谐、财税与就业扩大等,并提出了进一步推进湖南承接产业转移促进经济发展的相关对策。     

国内国际双循环相互促进研究——中国规模化经济视角

构建"以国内大循环为主体,国内国际双循环相互促进的新发展格局",并不是忽视国际循环,而是追求国际循环更高质量的发展。本文通过对中国与相同人均GDP时期的日本、韩国和欧美国家进行比较发现,同发展水平下,中国的生产、消费和对外贸易等的规模均远大于这些已经实现工业化的国家。这种规模化发展模式不仅促成了国内大循环强大的生产供给能力和消费需求潜能,而且可以通过出口贸易、对外投资、进口消费和外资引进等多条路径向其他国家释放"工业化红利",加速全球特别是诸多发展中国家的工业化进程,助推国际循环的高质量发展。本文从中国规模化经济视角探讨中国全球工业化的贡献,为国内国际双循环相互促进的新发展格局提供了理论支持。     

新企业所得税法实施对欠发达地区（宿迁）经济的影响

新企业所得税法的实施,对我国内外资企业发展、引进外资和地方经济发展等方面产生了重大影响。宿迁市作为一个经济欠发达地区,新税法的实施,有助于促进宿迁市农业产业化,促进高新技术企业的发展,提高企业市场竞争力和外资引进的质量和水平。为应对新税法的实施,宿迁市应充分利用新税法的税收政策和结合地区特点,促进农业规模化 促进传统产业高新技术化和高新技术产业化 创造公平的竞争环境和改善投资环境,促进本地区经济协调快速发展。     

我国风险投资评估指标体系研究——基于高新技术项目产业化过程的分析

对国内外学者风险投资评估的文献进行了研究,在此基础上围绕市场、产品、技术、管理及财务等影响风险关健因素,结合高新技术项目产业化的过程,从风险和收益两个方面构建了我国风险投资评估的动态指标体系,并对各指标的含义做出了说明.     

The role of domestic savings in outward-oriented growth strategies

This paper presents a theory of technological catching-up in which local savings plays a key complementary role to international finance and foreign technology. Until now, the literature has primarily emphasized “outward orientation” as the key ingredient of catching-up success. It has indeed been argued that countries which have relied intensively on foreign technologies, either through capital goods imports or foreign direct investment inflows, have been successful while countries which have opted for inward-oriented growth strategy relying on domestic investment and import-substitution strategies have been unsuccessful. In this paper, we develop a sequential model of industrialization in which domestic savings is key to the success of outward-oriented growth strategies. Indeed, internal finance helps to overcome time-to-adjustment constraints which occur in the early phases of the catching-up process when both advanced foreign technologies and backward domestic ones co-exist. In this model, external finance, though international borrowing, and domestic savings are complementary, not substitutable, in the course of technological catching-up.

Binding constraint on economic growth under export-oriented industrialization and globalization

The two-gap model of economic growth implies that different constraints on economic growth, namely the savings and the foreign exchange availability, are binding at different times. This article estimates these varying binding constraints in 16 countries in East and Southeast Asia and Latin America, and explores their differences across countries, regions and periods. I show that the East and Southeast Asian countries, which are recognized to be successful in export-oriented industrialization, are less constrained by the foreign exchange availability with reinforced export capacity than the Latin American countries, which had carried some inertia of import substituting industrialization policy until the 1980s. In addition, the economic growth turns out to be more constrained by the domestic savings in recent years, which can be a reflection of capital account liberalization policies typically implemented in the late 1980s and 1990s, and/or a diminishing return to export-led growth. In either case, this might be a factor underlining the recent reconsideration of export-oriented development strategy to balance past excessive dependence on the external demand in several countries in East and Southeast Asia.     

Wealth Concentration over the Path of Development: Sweden, 1873–2006*

We study wealth concentration in Sweden over 130 years, from the beginning of industrialization until the present day. Our series are based on new evidence from estate and wealth tax data, foreign and domestic family firm‐wealth, and pension wealth estimates. We find that Swedish wealth concentration was high in the agrarian state, and changed little during early industrialization. From World War I until about 1950, the richest percentile lost ground to high‐income earners in the rest of the top‐wealth decile. This equalization continued postwar; the entire top decile lost‐out relative to the rest of the population. Around 1980, wealth compression stopped and inequality increased. We approximate the effects of international flows and find that the recent increase in wealth inequality is probably larger than what official estimates suggest.     

A structuralist North–South model on structural change,economic growth and catching-up

This paper presents a structuralist North–South model on structural change, industrialization and economic convergence. In a balance-of-payments-constrained macro-setting, we assume a cumulative process between industrialization and growth. Differently from the traditional post-Keynesian models, we endogenize the productive structure of developing countries. We enquire how industrialization affects uneven development and convergence processes. Multiple growth paths and a long-run path-dependent equilibrium emerge. Industrialization proves to be a necessary but not sufficient condition for catching-up. Good management by the domestic institutions of domestic industrialization is a complementary requirement.     

Debt crisis,accumulation crisis and economic restructuring in Latin America

The policy debate over the Latin American debt crisis has shifted from the issue of short-term adjustment to that of long-term restructuring. The history of import substituting industrialization (IS) is reviewed in order to establish a context for the current restructuring debates. We argue that the demise of the IS model was primarily due to narrow domestic markets, heavy imports of capital goods and excessive ties with foreign multinationals, not to inefficiencies inherent in market-constraining policies. From this perspective, free market, export-led growth policies are opposed as an appropriate restructuring strategy and policies of redistribution, regional integration and major debt concessions are supported.     

劳动力转移过程中的高储蓄、高投资和中国经济增长

中国的转轨经济具有独特的增长模式,其典型特征就是持续的高储蓄率和高投资率。本文从劳动力转移的角度,解释了这种模式赖以产生的基础。我们认为,剩余劳动力由农业向工业(工业化)、由农村向城市(城市化)、由国有向非国有(市场化)的持续转移是我国经济能够长期、高速增长的关键,而高储蓄率和高投资率既是这种增长模式的必然结果,也是劳动力得以持续转移乃至这种增长模式得以维持的关键原因。为了防止效率低下的金融部门阻碍劳动力的转移,在开放经济条件下,引入纯粹金融意义的国际直接投资也就成为了必然。与此同时,本国金融部门也将持有一个规模逐步扩大的外汇储备。本文的另一个重要结论是,中国经济的增长和波动是统一的。尽管其中的机制有别于真实经济周期理论,但是,“中性”依然应该作为宏观经济政策的基本出发点。     

全球化时代的中国经济及其世界性影响

全球化进程决定了中国经济的高度开放,造就了双重资本积累模式,即内资主导的工业化城市化积累和外资主导的全球低端制造平台积累.这一模式加速了中国经济增长,同时削弱了经济自主.反过来,中国对世界经济造成了多方面影响,包括改变劳资利益格局,推动各国产业重组,改变金融市场结构,加强中美金融依赖等,这些影响随着中国的经济增长和结构升级将日趋显著.因此,中国必须立足内需实现可持续增长,并依靠技术创新来控制资源和环境成本.