Numerical representation of intransitive preferences on a countable set

Let > be a preference relation on a countable set X. We prove that if > is acyclic (that is, has irreflexive transitive closure), then there exists a mapping u of X into $\text{R}$ such that x > y entails u(x)>u(y). We also give a simple proof of a representation theorem of Fishburn when > is an interval order.     

Representing interval orders by a single real-valued function

Let > be an interval order on a topological space X, and let $\text{x > 1 y}$ if and only if there exists x′ with $\text{x?x′>y}$. Then >1 is a preference relation with transitive indifference, which, under suitable conditions, can be represented by a utility function v of the usual sort. In that case, maximisation of v (subject to contraints) leads to a most preferred point relative to >. Following both the Debreu-Rader and the Arrow-Hahn approaches, we discuss the existence and continuity of such a function v.     

Transitive measurable utility

This paper continues a study of theories of preferences under risk that do not use the independence axiom of the von Neumann-Morgenstern theory. Unlike its predecessor, it assumes that preferences are transitive. The effects of transitivity are noted in two representations of preferences. The first, which also uses continuity and dominance axioms, involves a function u on a set P of probability measures for which u(p) > u(q) if and only if p is preferred to q. Although u might be nonlinear, it has other features of a von Neumann-Morgenstern linear utility function. The second representation has linear functions u and w on P, with w strictly positive except perhaps at preference-extreme measures—where it might vanish, such that u(p) w(q) > u(q) w(p) if and only if p is preferred to q. A symmetry axiom along with the axioms for the first representation are necessary and sufficient for the second representation.     

Some results on “an income fluctuation problem”

A consumer at each period, given the income available, y, has to decide how much to consume and save. If he consumes c ? 0 units he gets u(c) units of satisfaction or utility, and if x = y ? c ? 0 is the amount saved then the available income in the next period is rx + ω^k, where ω^k is a random variable, and r is an interest factor that is assumed to be known with certainty. Infinite time horizon problems are considered, and it is shown that if 0 < δr < 1, where 0 < δ < 1 is a discount factor, then the limiting policy is optimal. Questions about the behavior of the stock level, such as boundness, are considered, and an example is given that shows that the stock level might converge almost surely to infinity. Finally an economic explanation is given.     

A class of multiattribute utility functions

A function u(z) is a utility function if u′(z) > 0. It is called risk averse if we also have u′′(z) < 0. Some authors, however, require that u ⁽ⁱ⁾(z) > 0 if i is odd and u ⁽ⁱ⁾(z) < 0 if i is even. The notion of a multiattribute utility function can be defined by requiring that it is increasing in each variable and concave as an s-variate function. A stronger condition, similar to the one in case of a univariate utility function, requires that, in addition, all partial derivatives of total order m should be positive if m is odd and negative if m is even. In this paper, we present a class of functions in analytic form such that each of them satisfies this stronger condition. We also give sharp lower and upper bounds for E[u(X ₁,... , X _s )] under moment information with respect to the joint probability distribution of the random variables X ₁,... , X _s assumed to be discrete and representing wealths. Partially supported by OTKA grants F-046309 and T-047340 in Hungary.     

Recursive preferences and balanced growth

We study a class of utility functions that are defined recursively by an aggregator W(x,y) where u_t=W(c_t,u_t+1). In single-agent economies it is known that a sufficient condition for the existence of a balanced growth path is that utility should be homogenous of degree γ. In the context of a multi-agent economy we show that this restriction implies that either a balanced growth equilibrium fails to exist or all agents have the same constant discount factor. We suggest a generalization of recursive preferences wherein the intertemporal utility function is time dependent. Within this class we establish that there may exist a balanced growth equilibrium even if agents are different.     

Asymptotic distribution of the sup-Wald statistic under specification errors

Consider a simple structural break model where y_t=α₁+β₁f(x_t)+u_t for t≤k₀ and y_t=α₂+β₂f(x_t)+u_t for t>k₀. The timing of break and the structural parameters are unknown. Suppose the true functional form of the regressor f(·) is misspecified as g(·). We do not place too many restrictions on the functional forms of f(·) and g(·). A frequently encountered example in economics is that the true model is measured in level, but we estimate a log-linear model, i.e. when f(x_t)=x_t and g(x_t)=log(x_t) For any f(·) and g(·), we derive a nonstandard limiting null distribution of the sup-Wald test statistic under some very general regularity conditions. Monte Carlo simulations support our findings.     

Min, Max, and Sum

This paper provides characterization theorems for preferences that can be represented by U(x₁, …, x_n)=min{x_k}, U(x₁, …, x_n)=max{x_k}, U(x₁, …, x_n)=∑ u(x_k), or combinations of these functionals. The main assumption is partial separability, where changing a common component of two vectors does not reverse strict preferences, but may turn strict preferences into indifference. We discuss applications of our results to social choice. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: C0, D1, D6.     

A characterization of the distributions that imply mean—Variance utility functions

If there is a riskless asset, then the distribution of every portfolio is determined by its mean and variance if and only if the random returns are a linear transformation of a spherically distributed random vector. If there is no riskless asset, then the spherically distributed random vector is replaced by a random vector in which the last n ? 1 components are spherically distributed conditional on the first component, which has an arbitrary distribution. If the number of assets is infinite, then there must exist random variables m, v, y, where the distribution of y conditional on m and v is standard normal, such that every portfolio is distributed as some linear combination of m and vy. If there is a riskless asset, then m has zero variance. These distributions exhibit two-fund separability even if the utility function is not concave.     

Price characterization of stable allocations in exchange economies with externalities

A pure exchange economy where the consumers have utility functions U_i(v₁(x₁),…, v_m(x_m)) for i = 1,…, m and where x_j is the consumption of consumer j, is studied. U_i may be nonincreasing or nondecreasing in v_j for j ≠ i. i is said to be nonbenevolent or nonmalevolent towards j, accordingly.An allocation is stable if no coalition can redistribute what it receives in the allocation to get an allocation which is preferred, given the consumptions of the consumers in the complementary coalition. Results concerning the relation among the Paretooptimal, stable and equilibrium allocations (under different definitions of equilibrium) are given. In particular, it turns out that in case every consumer is non-benevolent towards every other consumer, the classical results, concerning the relation between Paretooptimal allocations and equilibrium allocations, can be generalized in a satisfactory way.     

When is multidimensional screening a convex program?

A principal wishes to transact business with a multidimensional distribution of agents whose preferences are known only in the aggregate. Assuming a twist (= generalized Spence-Mirrlees single-crossing) hypothesis, quasi-linear utilities, and that agents can choose only pure strategies, we identify a structural condition on the value b(x,y) of product type y to agent type x — and on the principal?s costs c(y) — which is necessary and sufficient for reducing the profit maximization problem faced by the principal to a convex program. This is a key step toward making the principal?s problem theoretically and computationally tractable; in particular, it allows us to derive uniqueness and stability of the principal?s optimal strategy — and similarly of the strategy maximizing the expected welfare of the agents when the principal?s profitability is constrained. We call this condition non-negative cross-curvature: it is also (i) necessary and sufficient to guarantee convexity of the set of b-convex functions, (ii) invariant under reparametrization of agent and/or product types by diffeomorphisms, and (iii) a strengthening of Ma, Trudinger and Wang?s necessary and sufficient condition (A3w) for continuity of the correspondence between an exogenously prescribed distribution of agents and of products. We derive the persistence of economic effects such as the desirability for a monopoly to establish prices so high they effectively exclude a positive fraction of its potential customers, in nearly the full range of non-negatively cross-curved models.     

Algebra of Integrated Time Series: Evidence from Unit Root Analysis

It is argued if x_t ~ I(1) and y_t ~ I(1), then running a regression x_t on y_t would produce spurious results because e _t would generally be I(1). However, there may exist a ‘b’ such that e _t  = x _t - by _t is I(0), then running a regression x _t on y _t would not produce spurious results. This special case of two integrated time series is known in the literature as cointegration. In this particular case, x _t and y _t are said to be cointegrated. In our review of the development of the concept of cointegration, we identified that the underlying reason for this special case to arise is the proposition that if x _t  ~ I(d _x ), y _t  ~ I(d _y ), then z _t  = bx _t  + cy _t  ~ I(max(d _x ,d _y )). In this research, we offer evidence against this proposition.     

Undominated directions of tax reform

This article considers the reform of a commodity tax system. Consumers' preferences over directions of tax reform are constructed from indirect utility functions. A Wicksellian decision procedure is used to define a dominance relation on the set of directions of change; direction x dominates direction y if and only if (a) everybody prefers x to y or (b) x is the status quo and at least one person prefers x to y. A number of characterizations of undominated directions of change are provided. A related unanimity rule procedure, which does not single out the status quo for special treatment, is also considered. Particular attention is paid to the issue of whether Wicksellian reforms preserve production efficiency. Remarks on the relationship between this work, previous work in optimal taxation theory, and social choice theory are also provided.     

Efficiency First or Equity First? Two Principles and Rationality of Social Choice

This paper formalizes two different principles to socially rank allocations under efficiency-equity trade off. The efficiency-first social preference relation ranks an allocation x higher than an allocation y if and only if (i) x is Pareto-superior to y or (ii) x and y are Pareto-noncomparable and x is equity-superior to y. The equity-first social preference relation reverses the order of application of the two criteria. We show that the efficiency-first relation may have a cycle, whereas the equity-first relation is transitive. We also characterize and compare the sets of maximal elements for these social preference relations in the Edgeworth box and examine the nonemptiness of the sets. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: D71, D63, D61.     

Choice and individual welfare

We propose an abstract method of systematically assigning a “rational” ranking to non-rationalizable choice data. Our main idea is that any method of ascribing welfare to an individual as a function of choice is subjective, and depends on the economist undertaking the analysis. We provide a simple example of the type of exercise we propose. Namely, we define an individual welfare functional as a mapping from stochastic choice functions into weak orders. A stochastic choice function (or choice distribution) gives the empirical frequency of choices for any possible opportunity set (framing factors may also be incorporated into the model). We require that for any two alternatives x and y, if our individual welfare functional recommends x over y given two distinct choice distributions, then it also recommends x over y for any mixture of the two choice distributions. Together with some mild technical requirements, such an individual welfare functional must weight every opportunity set and assign a utility to each alternative x which is the sum across all opportunity sets of the weighted probability of x being chosen from the set. It therefore requires us to have a “prior view” about how important or representative a choice of x at a given situation is.     

Partial identification in binary response models with nonignorable nonresponses

This study investigates the identification of parameters in semiparametric binary response models of the form y=1(x^′β+v+ε>0)$y=1(x^{\prime }\beta +v+\epsilon >0)$ when there are nonignorable nonresponses. We propose an estimation procedure for the identified set, the set of parameters that are observationally indistinguishable from the true value β$\beta$, based on the special regressor approach of Lewbel (2000). We show that the estimator for the identified set is consistent in the Hausdorff metric.     

Private provision of a discrete public good: efficient equilibria in the private-information contribution game

We study the voluntary provision of a discrete public good via the contribution game. Players independently and simultaneously make nonrefundable contributions to fund a discrete public good, which is provided if and only if contributions cover the cost of production. We characterize nonconstant continuous symmetric equilibria, giving sufficient conditions for their existence. We show the common normalization by which players’ values are distributed over [0, 1] is not without loss of generality: if the distribution over this interval has continuous density f with f(0) >  0, then no (nonconstant) continuous symmetric equilibrium exists. We study in detail the case in which players’ private values are uniformly distributed, showing that, generically, when one continuous equilibrium exists, a continuum of continuous equilibria exists. For any given cost of the good, multiple continuous equilibria cannot be Pareto ranked. Nevertheless, not all continuous equilibria are interim incentive efficient. The set of interim incentive efficient equilibria is exactly determined. The authors thank Manfred Dix, George Mailath, Andrew Postlewaite, and an anonymous referee for their comments.     

Rising marginal cost and concavity of the production function

Suppose a production function, f, is continuous, quasi-concave and weakly monotone on the non-negative orthant of Euclidean n-space. Let c(·, ·) be the associated cost function. Then it is shown that f is concave if and only if for each w, c(w, ·) is convex.     

Topological upper limits of mixed Nash equilibria

Our purpose in this article is to prove that given any integer n ≥ 2 and any non-empty compact Polish spaces S ₁, ..., S _n , if for any u ∈ C( S ₁ × ... × S _n , R) ⁿ , we denote by MNE(u) the set of mixed Nash equilibria of (S ₁, ..., S _n , u), then MNE(u) is a non-empty compact subset of P(S ₁) × ... × P(S _n ) and if u ^k → u in C(S ₁ × ... × S _n , R) ⁿ as k → ∞, then lim sup _{k → ∞} MNE (u ^k ) MNE(u). The author would like to thank the referee for offering critical comments on this paper.