共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 366 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
实践社团成员知识转移程度与个体知识效用大小紧密相关。初步探讨了实践社团情境下个体知识效用与知识转移之间的相互关系。基于效用价值理论和系统论,提出个体知识效用函数及界定知识效用影响因素。同时,分析在实践社团特定环境中个体知识转移机理,为团队知识共享研究提供一个新的切入点,也为组织知识学习与创新提出新理论依据。 相似文献
4.
5.
文章以知识密集型服务业研发团队为研究对象,通过四省103家知识密集型服务业150个研发团队的问卷调查,采用结构方程模型,实证研究研发团队共享心智模式对团队创新绩效的影响机制,研究发现:共享心智模式对团队创新绩效有显著影响,并且,团队沟通与团队冲突管理在共享心智模式与团队创新绩效的关系中发挥完全中介作用。因此,企业研发团队在开发共享心智模式的同时,必须注重团队过程的提升,才能有效提升团队整体创新绩效。 相似文献
6.
本文主要基于知识转移的视角来研究产学研合作,以高技术创业行业为例,通过个体、团队、企业层面之间隐性知识和显性知识的转移与共享,来研究高技术创业行业的产学研合作和发展。文章主要通过以下四方面的内容:一是高技术创业行业中的隐性知识的转移与共享机制,二是隐性知识外在化显性知识的知识转移过程,三是显性知识之间的知识转移过程分析,四是显性知识内在化隐性知识的知识转移过程。通过以上四个隐性知识和显性知识的知识转移过程,探讨高技术创业行业的产学研合作过程,期望能够促进产学研合作的发展。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
新兴经济体企业的国际化行为已经成为国际商务领域的研究热点之一,但如中国这样的新兴经济体的跨国企业是否能够通过研发国际化行为提升母公司的创新绩效,现有文献对该问题尚缺乏足够的研究。文章基于2011-2017年间沪深两市310家信息技术业上市跨国企业的年度观察数据,采用泊松面板固定效应模型考察了企业研发国际化与母公司创新绩效之间的关系,并首次从逆向知识转移的视角,探讨了吸收能力和地理多样性对研发国际化和创新绩效两者关系的调节作用。实证结果表明:中国企业的研发国际化显著促进母公司创新绩效的提升;以研发投入强度衡量的企业吸收能力显著正向调节研发国际化和创新绩效之间的关系,而以布劳异质性指数测量的地理多样性则显著负向调节研发国际化和创新绩效的关系。研究结果对中国企业国际化行为具有重要启示。该研究发现意味着中国企业在国际化过程中应该加大海外研发投资力度以提升母公司创新绩效,且为更好地实现外部知识的逆向转移,应同时提高企业总体研发投入强度。但作为新兴经济体企业,不宜在地理分布上实行快速扩张,否则较高的沟通和协调成本将弱化逆向知识转移的程度,而不利于母公司创新绩效的提升。 相似文献
12.
以企业68个研发团队为研究对象,基于情感事件理论、自我归类理论以及人际互动理论,以“团队投入-团队状态-团队过程-团队产出”为整体逻辑框架,引入个人-团队匹配作为团队状态和团队心理安全感作为团队过程,构建链式中介模型,从团队行为形成机制角度揭示包容型领导对团队创新行为的作用路径。研究发现,企业包容型领导风格能够直接或间接地通过团队成员的个人-团队匹配和团队心理安全感促进研发团队创新行为。既弥补了包容型领导风格在团队创新层面研究的不足,又深化了对团队创新行为形成机制的探索。 相似文献
13.
14.
文章以2.58名研发人员为调研对象,研究了组织自尊通过知识共享的中介作用对员工创新行为的影响机理。研究结果表明:组织自尊显著影响员工创新行为,且知识共享的两个维度知识贡献和知识收集在组织自尊对员工创新行为的影响关系中起到部分中介作用。 相似文献
15.
Sjak Smulders 《International Economics and Economic Policy》2004,1(2-3):173-194
This paper studies the effects of international capital market integration on welfare and the speed of adjustment in a two-region endogenous growth model. Monopolistic firms undertake research and development (R&D) to improve their productivity level. National and international knowledge spillovers affect the returns to R&D. The two countries differ with respect to the initial productivity level and R&D capability (which is a proxy for human capital and structural policies). Long-run productivity gaps are determined by the difference in R&D capability. Over time, there is conditional convergence in productivity levels. The speed of convergence is larger with integrated international capital markets than without. Long-run gaps in consumption levels are larger in the former situation than in the latter. Capital market integration harms (benefits) the leading (lagging) region if domestic spillovers are more important than international spillovers and differences in R&D capabilities are small.The authors research is supported by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. He thanks Lucas Bretschger, Theo van de Klundert, and Richard Nahuis, Thomas Steger, and Helmut Wagner for comments on an earlier version. 相似文献
16.
17.
René Belderbos Elissavet Lykogianni Reinhilde Veugelers 《Review of World Economics》2008,144(2):183-206
We empirically test a model of foreign research and development (R&D) investments that takes into account strategic interaction
in R&D location decisions by multinational firms in the context of R&D cross-investments, R&D spillovers and foreign technology
sourcing strategies. We find support for most of the predictions of the model in an empirical analysis of the location of
patented innovations by the largest European manufacturing firms in 22 ISIC industries during 1996–1997. For technology leaders
in Europe, foreign R&D ratios respond positively to host country product market competition, while technology laggards avoid
these locations. Foreign R&D by technology laggards increases more strongly with the efficiency of (reverse) international
technology transfer while leaders are attracted more strongly to countries with better intellectual property rights (IPRs)
protection. Foreign R&D of both technology leaders and technology laggards increases with the size of the local knowledge
pool and the size of manufacturing operations in the host country.
JEL no. D21, F23, L16 相似文献
18.
针对制约行为决策的时间框架,拓展出行为决策中的“时间框架效应”理论命题,构建知识团队决策过程中的时间框架效应影响机制,并提出“基于时间框架效应的时间管理”理念。通过对ROUTE66项目团队决策过程的案例分析,探索和验证现实知识团队决策过程中的时间框架效应及其影响。 相似文献
19.
This paper examines whether allocating more research and development (R&D) activities to a country-industry pair with a higher intensity of knowledge flows improves the innovation performance of multinational enterprises (MNEs). We use firm-patent-matched data for Japanese manufacturing MNEs, including data on MNEs’ offshore R&D expenditure and information on patents filed by both parent firms and overseas affiliates. Moreover, as a proxy for the intensity of knowledge flows, we use the eigenvector centrality of each country-industry pair in the global knowledge flow network, utilizing patent citation information.We find that the quality-adjusted number of patent applications tends to be higher for MNEs that allocate more R&D activities to country-industry pairs that are more central in the network of global knowledge flows. However, we did not find any significant relationship between the country and industry distribution of offshore R&D and the number of patent applications. 相似文献
20.
Applying the theories of heterogeneous firms and the propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) method to a rich dataset of Chinese manufacturing firms, this paper examines the self-selection of firm-level R&D input and estimates the net effect of R&D on productivity. The analysis shows that (1) for Chinese manufacturing firms as a whole, R&D input is influenced by firm productivity: more productive firms are more likely to invest in R&D; (2) controlling for the self-selection effect, the net output elasticities of R&D input in one year and two years after R&D input are 3.92% and 5.25%, respectively; (3) although state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely than all other ownership groups to invest in R&D, the R&D input is not productive; (4) although enterprises owned by investors outside of Mainland China are the least likely to invest in R&D, the output elasticity of R&D is more significant and larger in this group than in SOEs and privately owned Chinese firms; and (5) surprisingly, the net effect of R&D is not significant in high-tech industries. Policy implications are derived from the findings. 相似文献