共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
2011年9月2日至7日,第十八届海峡两岸城市发展研讨会在湖北省武汉市召开。由彭光辉理事长带领的台湾都市计划学会一行29位专家代表,中国城市科学研究会及河南、郑州、北京、天津、河北、邯郸、呼和浩特、长春、宁波、福州等省市的城市科学研究会和有关单位的一百多位领导及专家组成的代表团出席了这次研讨会。 相似文献
5.
2010年9月6日至13日,以中国城市科学研究会副理事长、建设部原副部长赵宝江为团长的中国城市科学研究会代表团一行22人赴台湾,与台湾都市计划学会,共同举办了第十七届海峡两岸城市发展学术研讨会。此届研讨会的主题是低碳城市与可持续发展 相似文献
6.
第十四届海峡两岸城市发展研讨会,于2007年8月26—30日在福建厦门举行。由中国城市科学研究会和台湾都市计划学会联合主办的“海峡两岸城市发展研讨会”,自1994年5月在台北台湾大学举行首届研讨会以来,已历时13年,每年确定一个主题,分别在大陆或台湾举行一次。今年举行的研讨会,主题确定为区域协调发展、城镇群协调发展规划和海峡西岸城镇群协调发展规划。会议期间代表们考察了闽南金三角厦门、泉州、漳州三地近年来城市发展情况,参观了已获联合国教科文组织亚太地区文化遗产保护奖的漳州市台湾路、香港路历史街区和正在申报世界文化遗产的… 相似文献
7.
8.
加强学术交流促进两岸城市可持续发展中国城市科学研究会理事长廉仲由中国城市科学研究会和台湾都市计划学会联合举办的“第四届海峡两岸城市发展研讨会”,今天在我们祖国西南的历史文化名城——成都市开幕了。首先,我代表中国城市科学研究会向出席研讨会的台湾学者和专... 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
文章从对海峡两岸的衡平仲裁制度的比较研究入手,找出各自的特色和不足,取长补短.严格的讲衡平仲裁制度在国际上是备受争议的.希望能够从比较研究的视角找出合理的利用办法,明晰争议的重点是如何在当事人意思自治和法律规范之间取得平衡. 相似文献
12.
文章从对海峡两岸的衡平仲裁制度的比较研究入手,找出各自的特色和不足,取长补短。严格的讲衡平仲裁制度在国际上是备受争议的。希望能够从比较研究的视角找出合理的利用办法,明晰争议的重点是如何在当事人意思自治和法律规范之间取得平衡。 相似文献
13.
14.
武汉商贸国有控股集团有限公司积极应对当前复杂多变的经济形势,完善"创新、集成、特色、跨越"的发展观念,着力打造具有竞争优势的五大特色物流版块,力争为领跑中部、布点全国、走向国际的综合型物流服务集成商。 相似文献
15.
16.
Chain-Store Pricing Across Local Markets 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Chain‐stores now dominate most areas of retailing. While retailers may operate nationally or even internationally, the markets they compete in are largely local. How should they best operate pricing policy in respect of the different markets served—price uniformly across the local markets or on a local basis according to market conditions? We model this by allowing local market differences, with retail markets differing by their size and the number of players present. We show that practising price discrimination is not always best for a chain‐store. Competitive conditions exist under which uniform pricing can raise profits. 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
20.
The purpose of this article is to assess the nature of reliability and its inconsistent definitions across three contextual (conceptual, measurement and statistical) levels under the traditional true score theory. Due to such inconsistencies, two existing quantitative approaches (using r and covariance) are not uniformly understood in Psychology and other disciplines; consequently, their applications to measurements and testings are limited to ambiguous interpretations at the conceptual and measurement levels. To examine the extent of this problem, a questionnaire including various contextual definitions and interpretations of reliability in the literature was distributed in a nationwide survey. Results from six groups of experts representing editors, professors and advanced graduate students in both quantitative and clinical areas indicate that all subject groups generally agreed that a reliable instrument possesses the characteristics of the repeatability of responses of all test-takers at the conceptual level, and the reproducibility of the instrument with little or no variations from the underlying true scores at the measurement level. However, between the editors and noneditors, the endorsements of the common definition at the measurement level show obvious discrepancies. Further, at the statistical level, significant differences were found not only between but also within subject-groups in their interpretations of product-moment correlations and Alpha coefficients for the assessment of reliability at the conceptual and measurement levels. The causes of such inconsistencies were discussed in terms of the inherent limitations of the two statistical approaches used and their insufficiencies for indexing the conceptual and measurement meanings of reliability. Finally, this paper called for developing new statistical indices that are coherent with conceptual and measurement definitions. Before such development, the capacities of existing reliability indices shall be redefined and their application qualifications shall be proportionally re-established for educational, research and clinical purposes. 相似文献