促进南南更广泛合作

随着近年来发展中国家经济的强劲发展,南南贸易水平不断增长,预计南南贸易不断增加的趋势在未来几年中仍将会进一步加强。金砖五国作为发展中国家的主要新兴国家,为整个发展中国家的经济增长与贸易发展提供了活力与动力。与此同时,其他南方国家也越来越成为金砖五国的重要贸易伙伴,他们与金砖五国的贸易总额在全球贸易中的份额已经从2003...     

进出口行支持企业“走出去”

中国进出口银行与太平洋造船集团和法国波邦集团签署的8亿美元融资框架协议,旨在为两集团签署的62艘海洋工程船商务框架合同提供一揽子融资支持。该项目的商务合同金额达10亿美元,是近年来全球市场上较大一笔新船订单,也是我国船企承接的自金融危机以来鲜见的大额订单。     

让优点创造价值

大部分致力于对员工弱点进行改造的行为,都是对组织的伤害,让人的长处得到发挥。又使人的短处不起作用,这才是组织最重要的特性。     

金融宏观调控:走过不寻常的“这些年”

几年来,我国货币政策与其他宏观政策的相互协调配合进一步加强和完善。充分发挥利率的调节作用,逐步推进利率市场化改革。金融宏观调控是国家对经济总量进行的调节与控制,保证社会再生产协调发展的必要条件,也是社会主义国家管理经济的一项重要职能。党的十六大特别是党的十七大以来,在各项宏观经济政策的护航下,我国经济发展取得了令人瞩目的成就,经济发展方式转变和经济结构调整取得重要进展,经济运行质量和效益稳步提高,     

资本市场尽享文化大餐

党的十七届六中全会明确提出,“十二五”期间,要推动文化产业成为国民经济的支柱性产业。面对难得的历史发展机遇,文化产业的大发展被提到前所未有的政治高度。刚刚闭幕的两会上,温家宝总理在政府工作报告中再次强调加强文化建设,并提出推动文化产业成为国民经济支柱产业。在政策扶持的滚滚春雷之后,各界人士热烈期盼着金融资本的“春雨”能够随之而至。     

民间资本回归实业

民间资本进入实体经济,必须循序渐进,有条不紊地推进。要通过政府宏观政策调控和导向,使实体经济利润可期,吸引民间资本。引导民间资本投资参股或者兴办村镇银行以及专门服务于小微企业的小型金融机构,鼓励和引导民间资本进入金融领域。     

企业管理要有“层”

现在很多管理人员都在被降级使用着,领导者在做高层该做的事,高层在做中层该做的事,中层又在做基层该做的事。一级一级地降级使用,—层—层地越位管理,依赖上级做管理是降级使用的典型特征。     

THE CAMERALISTIC METHOD OF ACCOUNTING: A HISTORICAL NOTE

This paper has three purposes: (1) to describe concisely the nature and the form of the Cameralistic method of accounting; (2) to evaluate the historical significance of the method in the light of the more general movement of mercantilism which prevailed at the time of its development, and (3) to discuss briefly the role and contribution which the method has made to the development of financial accounting techniques. The Cameralistic method is shown to have an integral stewardship system of admirable perfection, given its single entry base.     

RETHINKING BANK REGULATION: A REVIEW OF THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE

The debate over bank powers has taken on special urgency with the recent flurry of proposed mergers, such as the Citicorp-Travelers Group combination, that would break down the barriers between commercial and investment banking. After more than a decade of failed attempts to expand the scope of permissible bank activities, the House of Representatives recently voted for the first time in favor of a bill to end these Depression era limitations. The issue will be taken up by the Senate this fall. Most of the rationales for regulating banks fall into two broad categories: (1) the need to control potential conflicts of interest stemming from banks' multiple roles as deposit-takers, lenders, securities underwriters, and investment advisers; and (2) the perceived need to protect against the possibility of bank panics and widespread financial instability. In reviewing the historical evidence compiled by banking and finance scholars over the years, this article finds remarkably little cause for concern and suggests the regulatory cure may be far worse than the disease. On the first issue, the article cites a number of recent studies suggesting that market forces deal more effectively than regulation with conflicts of interests that can arise when commercial banks are engaged in securities underwriting. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, investors during the pre-Glass-Steagall era appear to have been better off when they purchased securities from commercial banks rather than investment banks. Moreover, to enhance their credibility in the market, many commercial banks during this period chose to put some distance between their lending and underwriting activities by establishing separate securities affiliates, thereby creating voluntary “firewalls.” In examining the issue of how the expansion of bank powers would affect economic stability, the second half of the article cites a large body of research–including studies of different historical periods and countries–attesting to the durability of commercial (and universal) banking systems. Indeed, one of the most important findings issuing from this research is that the regulatory safety net has often had the unfortunate impact of undermining rather than promoting financial stability.     

WHY BANKS HAVE A FUTURE: TOWARD A NEW THEORY OF COMMERCIAL BANKING

According to some observers, the commercial bank–an institution that conducts the twin activities of accepting deposits payable on demand and originating loans–has outlived its usefulness and is in a state of terminal decline. The broad statistical evidence for this contention, however, is somewhat mixed. While some studies suggest that the role of banks in the United States is declining, others suggest that banks are simply using new vehicles to offer their services and that their role has not diminished at all. This article takes a different approach to analyzing the future of banks by examining the economic rationale for their past existence and exploring the extent to which this rationale can be expected to hold up in the future. The author begins by explaining why the two core banking activities–taking in deposits payable on demand and originating non-marketable loans–are performed by the same institutions. The explanation turns on the recognition that both activities essentially require the institution to come up with cash on short notice–that is, to provide liquidity. Scale economies in providing liquidity explain why both activities are provided by the same entity. Deregulation and innovation have increased competition in the financial services industry, which has forced banks to concentrate on the essentials of liquidity provision. This is why the outward nature of banks' activities has changed (for example, banks today often sell instead of holding loans, and provide back-up lines for commercial paper instead of originating loans), though not their underlying economic rationale (particularly the credit evaluation and monitoring involved in “relationship” banking). Beneath the surface reality of dramatic changes in financial products and services, the fundamental banking business of liquidity provision is alive and well. Moreover, in the course of performing their traditional activities, banks have acquired competencies that enable them to perform a variety of other financial and nonfinancial activities that deregulation and innovation have opened up to them. As part of their evaluation of these nontraditional activities, bankers must ensure that their organizational structures, controls, and compensation policies are appropriate for the new environment of deregulation and technological change.     

让农民享受均等化金融服务

贵州省是一个农村贫困面大,农民贫困程度深的西部内陆省份,是全国扶贫攻坚的主战场,要在2020年基本消除绝对贫困现象、与全国实现同步奔小康,最关键的是要切实增加农民收入。对于农村信用社而言,支持农民增收,就是要树立以人为本、服务为先的理念,切实围绕广大人民群众的金融服务需求,千方百计把解决广大人民群众的贷款难作为自己的职...     

“混业”将银行保险推上加速档

在国内金融市场竞争日趋国际化的趋势下,混业经营的内在要求日益显露,银行保险作为混业的一个合理切入点,成为商业银行收益的来源之一。银行代理销售保险产品,也是金融业多元化、综合化的必然趋势．未来的银行、保险、证券可能是你中有我,我中有你。紧紧抓住混业经营的先兆和先机,将有助于提高商业银行的整体竞争力。     

监管与合作：美国证监会与共同基金

SEC与基金业的关系为合作伙伴关系，两方都担负着责任。基金业承担着操作责任和公众责任，它须使这个行业保持创新与竞争的状态，并保护投资的利益。SEC承担的诸多责任中，最重要的是尊重自由市场的神奇力量，并在可能的时候利用市场的方式如信息披露，解决市场的问题。证监会与基金业的关系为美国的投资提供了半个多世纪的良好服务。     

让资本市场更好服务国民经济——访全国人大代表、吉林证监局局长江连海

江连海指出,期权交易是一种比期货交易更加灵活、安全、有效的交易方式,它可以使交易者特别是买者的成本很低、风险有限、利润可观,如果利用期权交易进行套期保值,可以实现双重保险之功效,它是期货套期保值的再套保,能够有效降低风险度,增大保险系数。因此,应积极适时推出期权交易。