对南昌昌南老工业区产业发展与布局问题的探讨

本文运用产业发展与空间布局理论,对南昌市城南老工业基地——青云谱区的工业发展与分布现状、产业发展优势进行了剖析,提出坚持实施“工业强区、三产兴区、旅游名区、经济大区”战略,描绘了未来昌南地区产业发展与空间布局的宏伟规划,并就实现这一目标阐明了具体路径,即优化工业布局,走新型工业化道路;做大做优商贸、物流、旅游业,加快现代服务业发展;深入实施大开放主战略,进一步提高产业发展层次。     

挖掘老大楼潜在价值

现代服务业是黄浦经济发展中的先导产业、主攻方向与最强的产业支撑，对区经济与社会发展的“再上新台阶”有着至关重要的作用。     

区域产业发展环境的差异性及变动性测量——基于“十一五”时期省域数据的实证

对近年来我国区域产业环境变化的总体态势以及区域间的差异性进行研究,是实施“十二五”区域发展战略的前提。在充分分析区域产业发展环境的基础上,从“生产要素”、“需求条件”、“相关支持产业”、“产业组织结构”和“政府行为”五个维度构建了测度区域产业发展环境差异性及变动性的指标体系,根据“十一五”期间31个省（市、区）的产业发展数据,运用熵值法确定了相应指标权重,通过聚类分析法分析了“十一五”期间我国区域产业发展环境的差异性及变动性。结果表明：“十一五”期间,我国促进区域协调发展的相关政策取得了一定的成效,但区域经济不平衡的格局并没有明显改善,“需求条件”和“产业组织结构”是区域产业发展环境特征变动的主导因素。     

产业集群的竞争优势与战略应用

产业集群的竞争优势源于其区域化、专业化、网络化、市场化等特性。产业集群效应既是产业集群存在的合理解释,也是产业集群的优势所在和不断完善的推动力。通过产业集群的有效培育和发展,可以实现区域经济发展的多种目标。不同主体培育与发展产业集群的目标不同,其思路也不同。政府在全面实施产业集群发展战略过程中,主要是运用“自下而上”与“自上而下”方式来培育与发展产业集群。     

台州现象,台州精神,台州问题——浙江台州市椒江区民营经济发展调研报告

2006年7月10日至13日,笔者有幸参加中央党校国际战略研究所组织的“台州市椒江区民营经济发展”调研活动,在区政府的安排和区科技局的陪同下,首先与区政府领导及区政府若干职能部门领导座谈,随后分别参观了飞跃集团、海正药业、星星集团和位于台州市路桥区的吉利集团并与各集团高管团队座谈。座谈主要围绕自主创新、产业升级、产业集聚、资源节约与环境保护等主题展开。通过紧张而充实的调研,笔者在真切感受到椒江区乃至台州市改革开放以来所取得的骄人成就的同时,也对椒江区乃至台州市民营经济发展所面临的瓶颈和隐忧有了进一步的了解,特撰此文对此加以总结和分析,并围绕椒江民营经济“创新求变、再创辉煌”提出若干建议。     

新型农村集体经济发展的实践与探索

习近平总书记在中央农村工作会议上强调,壮大集体经济是引领农民实现共同富裕的重要途径。汉中市南郑区始终把发展壮大新型农村村级集体经济作为乡村振兴重要抓手,不断拓展增收渠道,构筑共同富裕发展的“新赛道”。基于此,介绍汉中市南郑区新型集体经济发展的成功范例,着重分析其产业发展模式,阐述新型农村集体经济组织嵌入乡村产业振兴的路径,对农村集体经济组织产业发展提出对策建议,以期从农民自组织层面赋能乡村产业振兴。     

支持主导产业做大做强，实现集群发展，打造经济升级版

湘潭经开区支持主导产业做大做强,实现集群发展,从而抢占产业发展的价值高地,是湘潭经开区打造经济升级版的关键一环。将一个企业做到年产值过百亿元,一个产业做到年产值过千亿元,打造“百亿企业”和“千亿产业”,成为今年湘潭经开区对第二产业升级提出的最大规划。     

新发展格局下应急产业的生成逻辑、市场化悖论与常态化发展

应急产业具有“应急”保障与“产业”发展双重功能以及政治、社会、经济三重属性。梳理政策话语体系中的应急产业，其“应急”的公益性指向始终未变，而其经济性的产业范畴却是动态变化的，贯彻总体国家安全观扩大了其外延。新发展格局需以新安全格局为保障，凸显应急产业发展的经济逻辑，但“应急”公益性与“产业”市场性产生了市场化悖论。新发展格局下应急产业具备常态化发展的逻辑，在发展初期应发挥政府的强主导作用，通过制度构建解决产业发展的不持续性问题；整合市场分散需求，促进应急市场消费能力提升和消费需求多元。同时，分类引导应急生产企业投资，降低风险、优化供给结构，最终形成产业常态化发展的内需拉动、政策引导、技术内生与数字赋能的均衡机制，实现经济功能有效支撑政治需要和民生保障等应急功能。     

推动珠江东西两岸协同发展 提升粤港澳大湾区整体竞争力

《粤港澳大湾区发展规划纲要》提出，提高珠江西岸地区发展水平，促进东西两岸协同发展。当前，粤港澳大湾区珠江东西两岸发展不平衡不充分问题突出，珠江西岸城市在基础设施、产业层次、公共服务、制度创新等方面与东岸城市仍存在较大差距，要素高效流动、产业密切关联、市场主体作用有效发挥的深层次合作格局尚未形成。随着大湾区基础设施互联互通加快推进，珠江西岸城市在地理区位、承载空间、对澳合作等方面已具备更好与东岸城市对接的基础。未来，推动大湾区珠江东西两岸协同发展，应进一步注重创新链产业链对接，“硬联通”与“软对接”双管齐下，加快实现从“物理联通”到“化学融合”的转变。     

贫富分居,有趣?

“穷人区”、“富人区”是近期的一个热点争论话题,事件的起因是由于任志强在一个会议上公开表示,中国有“穷人区”“富人区”很正常。其他几位在场的房地产大腕对任志强的观点也很支持,认为“富人区”不可避免。可见在很多开发商眼中,穷人就应该与富人分开居住。那么假设这些开发商的观点是正确的,真将城市分割成几大“穷人区”和“富人区”,最终受益的会是哪些人?又会出现一些什么样的有趣事呢？     

The Nexus of Population,Energy, Innovation,and Complexity

For the past 200 years, humans have benefited from the abundant, inexpensive, and easily obtained energy of fossil fuels. Energy surpluses such as this are unusual in human history. In systems with little surplus energy, population growth is low and complexity emerges slowly due to the energetic costs it carries. On the rare occasions when energy is readily available, societies respond by growing rapidly. They must become more complex in response to the social, economic, and resource challenges of dense population. More complex societies are more expensive, requiring greater energy per capita. The process of increasing complexity necessitates greater energy production, creating a positive feedback cycle. Past societies have collapsed under such pressures. Population and complexity grew rapidly when the Industrial Revolution replaced economies based on annual solar radiation with economies fueled by fossil energy. The Green Revolution of the 20^th century is credited with preventing mass starvation, but it has made food production and sustaining population ever‐more dependent on high‐energy (low‐entropy) inputs. Some believe innovation will overcome the limitations of resources and permit unchecked growth. However, increases in complexity, innovation, and fossil energy are all subject to diminishing returns, and cannot continue to support population at current levels.     

The Who,Where, What,How and When of Market Entry

This introductory, along with the eight articles contained within this Special Issue, highlights and brings greater clarity to entrant‐incumbent interactions and to firm movement – when entrants traverse market territories for the creation and/or delivery of offerings, where ‘markets’ include service or product categories, technology or resource spaces, industries, sectors and/or geographies. Collectively, this Special Issues explains that firm movement across market boundaries is highly consequential, influencing resource‐capability mixes inside firms, interfirm relations, market logic and industry value chains, and of course, people, communities and even nations. Specifically, we develop a field‐wide perspective of market entry by expanding on the framework of market entry that Zachary and his colleagues developed (Zachary et al., 2015) – i.e., the who (players such as incumbents, entrants, suppliers, etc.), when (the timing and sequence of entry), how (the strategy, resources, capabilities, etc.), where (the space of entry) and what (product, service, business model, etc.) – to include two additional categories: complements (networks, platforms, ecosystems) and non‐market elements (government, political, social and cultural arrangements). We also summarize the eight highly diverse and insightful articles that make this Special Issue, and conclude with a discussion to highlight foundational questions that point to new directions in future research in this field. In sum, we hope to inspire scholars to go beyond counting outcomes (e.g., entry/exit rates, or profiling successful versus unsuccessful entrants), to consider contexts, processes and contingencies (e.g., cost, time, collaboration, competition, interfirm relations, etc.) and to discover boundary conditions that inform a theory of market entry.     

企业文化的“势”、“道”、“法”、“术”、“气”

一、关于企业文化的模式 企业文化是企业在成长发展过程中形成的一系列基本价值观和核心理念以及受此影响和制约的组织行为方式和员工行为方式。关于企业文化的模式,国内外均有较多的论述和实践。     

The fed model: The bad,the worse,and the ugly

The negative relationship between stock market P/E ratios and government bond yields seems to have become conventional wisdom among practitioners. However, limited empirical evidence and a misleading suggestion that the model originated in the Fed are used to support the model's plausibility. This article argues that the Fed model is flawed from a theoretical standpoint and reports evidence from 20 countries that seriously questions its empirical merits. Despite its widespread use and acceptance, the Fed model is found to be a failure both as a normative and as a positive model of equity pricing.