审计收费对审计质量的影响

审计收费与审计质量既相互独立又相互影响.我国审计市场中在审计收费方面存在很多问题,如缺乏公认的审计计费标准;审计收费水平总体上偏低,恶性竞争现象严重;现行审计费用的付款方式不合理.综合整治的措施应包括:改革审计收费标准;合理增加会计师事务所收入;改变审计市场地区封锁;健全法律法规;改革审计费用付款方式.     

审计收费对审计质量的影响

审计收费与审计质量既相互独立又相互影响。我国审计市场中在审计收费方面存在很多问题,如缺乏公认的审计计费标准;审计收费水平总体上偏低,恶性竞争现象严重;现行审计费用的付款方式不合理。综合整治的措施应包括：改革审计收费标准;合理增加会计师事务所收入;改变审计市场地区封锁;健全法律法规;改革审计费用付款方式。     

从审计收费视角谈会计师事务所的社会责任

本文分析了目前我国审计收费体系对会计师事务所履行社会责任的影响,提出规范审计收费体系、制定科学的审计收费标准、建立市场约束机制、健全民事诉讼赔偿机制等措施,以保障会计师事务所履行社会责任。     

影响独立审计收费的原因及对策

独立审计作为一种市场活动,其收费标准必然受到审计市场环境的影响.本文从我国独立审计收费存在的主要问题出发,分析了影响我国独立审计收费存在问题的原因,并提出了相应的解决对策.     

会计师事务所审计收费问题成因剖析及其治理

现行审计收费制度和方式,严重影响着审计质量、审计市场秩序和行业正常发展。本文分析了现行审计收费中存在的问题、影响及成因,提出了合理协调审计收费标准、完善审计收费激励机制、矫正审计市场价值导向、健全审计收费法律制度、强化审计收费行业自律、设立“审计收费监管委员会”等治理对策。     

我国注册会计师审计收费的现状与对策

审计收费直接影响着审计的独立性和审计质量,而审计质量又时注册会计师的发展起着决定性的作用.本文从我国审计收费的现状出发,分析了我国注册会计师审计收费存在的问题及其原因,并针对这些问题提出改善审计收费的对策.     

我国审计收费问题的原因分析与对策

审计收费是产生于审计委托代理契约中的一项代理费用。总体上说,我国注册会计师审计收费问题主要表现为:审计收费缺乏公认标准,收费水平偏低,恶性竞争现象严重。本文从我国审计收费现状出发,对审计收费决定因素和审计市场有效需求进行了分析,最后提出了改革审计收费的思路。     

对我国独立审计收费问题的思考

本文从我国独立审计收费的实际情况出发,分析了影响审计收费的主要因素,为完善我国独立审计收费提供一些借鉴及思考.     

审计收费研究综述及启示

审计收费研究是审计市场研究的重要组成部分,研究审计收费可以使我们了解审计收费的影响因素和审计市场的竞争状况,发现低价揽客或审计折扣等可能损害到审计师的独立性以及降低审计质量的行为。本文对国外有关审计收费的研究文献进行了回顾和总结,介绍了国外审计收费的基本模型,并从客户特征、审计师特征和契约特征角度论述了审计收费的影响因素,以及从需求角度研究审计收费的新视角,最后提出了国外审计收费研究对我国审计收费研究的启示,指出了未来的研究方向。     

上市公司审计收费问题研究

合理收费对我国注册会计师行业及上市公司的的生存和发展至关重要.本文通过对国内上市公司审计收费统计数据的研究,结合我国的制度背景和注册会计师行业的发展现状,分析其审计收费中存在的问题,并针对这些问题提出改善审计收费制度的对策.     

审计师行业专长对审计收费的影响分析——来自2006～2007年我国审计市场的证据

本文在借鉴传统审计收费模型的基础上,采用我国A股上市公司2006～2007年的数据,对审计师行业专长与审计收费之间的相关关系进行实证分析.研究表明,我国的审计师行业专长程度较低,审计师行业专长与审计收费之间存在正相关关系.研究审计师行业专长与审计收费之间的关系对于规范审计定价行为、形成有效市场结构有重要意义.     

审计收费与审计质量的关系研究——基于第一大股东不同持股比例的视角

以2002—2009年度因财务舞弊受到中国证监会处罚的上市公司为样本,分析在第一大股东不同持股比例下,审计收费与审计质量的关系,在控制了审计意见的相关影响因素后发现:在上市公司第一大股东持股比例较高时,审计收费与审计质量呈负相关;第一大股东持股比例较低时,审计收费与审计质量正相关。     

不同监督情境下政府创新支持对企业研发投入的影响——基于农业上市公司的实证研究

近年来,“三农”问题受到极大关注。为了应对外部资源、环境、科学技术等多重压力对农业升级与发展的影响,政府出台了诸多政策支持农业企业的技术研发与创新。本文从政府干预视角分析政府补助和税费返还两种形式的政府创新支持政策对农业企业研发投入的影响,重点分析机构投资者与大股东参与公司内部治理以及社会审计事务机构参与公司外部治理这两者所发挥的不同监督作用。研究发现：第一,不同形式的政府创新支持（政府补助和税费返还）对农业企业研发投入的影响并不一致。政府补助产生替代效应,税费返还则产生互补效应。第二,持股监督（机构投资者和大股东的持股比例上升）能增强政府补助对农业企业研发投入的替代效应,也能增强税费返还对农业企业研发投入的互补效应。第三,审计监督（社会审计事务机构的审计意见）会减弱政府补助支持对农业企业研发投入的替代效应,也会减弱税费返还对农业企业研发投入的互补效应。本文的研究发现为政府制定适宜的创新支持政策,以及合理发挥持股监督与审计监督的内外部治理作用,提供一定的决策依据和理论支持。     

基于审计风险的区域化审计定价的研究

审计定价的区域化在我国是以行政手段实施的,这种定价忽略了一个十分重要的因素--审计风险补偿,进而使审计定价的模型存在着技术缺陷.基于审计风险的区域化审计定价,要求在审计定价中考虑地域差异对审计风险的影响以及审计定价中的风险补偿问题.实证研究表明,异地客户并未选择比本地客户更高的审计价格,而是选择了一种"逆理性"的更低的忽略审计风险的竞争价格.这种非常现象应引起政府监管部门与学术界的关注.     

道德风险条件下高校产学研合作中价格契约研究

利用技术许可中价格契约的基本理论,对高校产学研合作中存在于企业的道德风险问题的价格契约治理机制进行了分析。分析结果表明,在产学研合作中,当企业存在道德风险问题时,一个次优产学研合作的价格契约是一个纯固定费用的价格契约;同时,高校为了对企业进行有效激励,将对企业进行一定的信息租的转移。     

The Relevance of Bargaining for the Licensing of a Cost‐reducing Innovation*

In the context of a Cournot duopoly, this paper studies the licensing of a cost‐reducing innovation by means of three possible allocation mechanisms: auction, fixed fee, and direct negotiation. Once the use of an arbitrary reserve price (which is not credible) has been excluded, it is no longer true that auction always yields higher profit to the patentee than a fixed fee. However, the authors propose a direct negotiation mechanism which restores the patentee's profit to the level of an auction with an arbitrary reserve price (which is unimplementable). Direct negotiation is superior to both an auction with a nonarbitrary reserve price and a fixed fee. From the social point of view, however, licensing with a fixed fee is the best option.     

Mixed Competition and Patent Licensing

This paper studies the patent licensing decision of an insider patentee when two firms engage in a mixed (Cournot–Bertrand or Bertrand–Cournot) competition where one firm adopts the quantity strategy while the other uses the price strategy and vice versa. If either the fixed fee or royalty is applied, then the licensor prefers the fixed fee when the licensor takes the quantity strategy, while the licensee uses the price strategy (Cournot–Bertrand). If the two‐part tariff is applied, then the two‐part tariff is more likely to be adopted by the licensor under Cournot–Bertrand than under Bertrand–Cournot competition.     

Advance disposal fee vs. disposal fee: A monopolistic producer’s durability choice model

This study examines how the timing of waste disposal fee collection affects the producer’s choice of built-in product durability and social welfare in a durable-goods monopoly model. We categorize the waste disposal fee policies into two: advance disposal fee (ADF) policy and disposal fee (DF) policy. We show that a DF policy has two opposing effects on durability. Firstly, a DF policy gives the producer an incentive to increase durability in order to delay the households’ waste disposal and to discount future payments of the disposal fee (the payment-discounting effect). Secondly, a DF policy creates an incentive for consumers to dump waste illegally in order to mitigate the payment of the disposal fee, and gives the producer an incentive to reduce durability in order to avoid market saturation and the associated future price cuts (the illegal-dumping effect). When the disposal fee is low, the payment-discounting effect dominates the illegal-dumping effect under a DF policy, leading to the enhancement of durability. In this case, from a social welfare viewpoint, a DF policy may be more desirable than an ADF policy if the environmental damage associated with illegal dumping is not serious. However, when the disposal fee is high, a DF policy induces more illegal dumping, reduces durability, and inflicts more environmental damage. Therefore, an ADF policy is more socially desirable than a DF policy when the disposal fee is high. Moreover, we consider an oligopoly case and find that an ADF policy is more socially desirable in an industry with smaller market power.     

Effect of Secondary School Fees on Educational Attainment*

In this study, the heterogeneity of the fee abolition process in West German secondary schools is used to identify the effect of school fees on educational attainment and to obtain an estimate of the price elasticity of upper secondary education. The analysis is based on representative individual‐level data from three annual surveys of the German Mikrozensus. While coefficients cannot be estimated precisely, the results suggest that, on average, upper secondary school attainment increased by at least 8 percent in response to the fee abolition. The educational attainment of females appears to be more price sensitive than that of males.     

Should football fans pay for security? Effects of a security fee

There is a lively debate on whether football fans should pay a security fee to finance police activities. This paper investigates the price effect on the demand for tickets in a dynamic setting, by considering two subgroups of spectators, namely fans and hooligans. We analyze a situation in which the demand from each subgroup causes a negative social externality for members of the other group but a positive one for members of the same group. We show that charging a security fee may start a dynamic process, leading to fewer fans and more hooligans attending matches and thus, counterintuitively to even more violence. Therefore, the present study provides an argument to refrain from charging a security fee. As an alternative economic solution, we discuss the strategy of outpricing hooligans.