Asset Prices, Monetary Policy and Macroeconomic Stability

This article discusses the role of asset prices in the conduct of monetary policy when the ultimate goal is to maintain price stability and limit fluctuations in real income. It is argued that judicious interpretation of asset price movements can provide information about the risks of future macroeconomic imbalances, and that this information should be utilized in monetary policy decisions. Simulations results from both theoretical and empirical models support the conceptual argument. It is stressed that policy reactions to asset prices must not follow a mechanical rule, since the appropriate response depends on the underlying shock.     

The Monetary Policy Implications of Behavioral Asset Bubbles

I introduce behavioral asset pricing rules into a wider dynamic stochastic general equilibrium framework. Asset price bubbles emerged endogenously within the model. I find that in this model monetary policy rules that target the mispricing of the asset have a destabilizing effect; however, a monetary policy rule that targets deviations in the price of the asset from its trend can be welfare enhancing. Such a rule would also have the benefit of being straightforward to implement.     

Liquidity Risk and Banks' Asset Composition: Implications for Monetary Policy

Monetary growth models in which the government is a net debtor demonstrate that inflation adversely affects capital formation through the crowding out effect. Interestingly, the results are at odds with empirical evidence. In particular, recent studies point to an asymmetric relationship between inflation and the real economy across countries. Specifically, inflation and output are negatively correlated in poor countries. In contrast, inflation is associated with higher levels of economic activity in advanced economies. I present a monetary growth model with public debt, where the exposure to risk is inversely related to the level of income. In this setting, I demonstrate that the effects of monetary policy depend on the level of capital of the economy. In poor countries, banks' portfolios consist primarily of government liabilities. Therefore, a higher rate of money creation inhibits capital formation in these economies. In contrast, banks devote more resources toward productive uses in advanced countries. Consequently, monetary policy generates a Tobin effect.     

资产价格在货币政策传导中的作用

文章对资产价格在货币政策传导中的作用进行实证研究，结果表明，我国同时存在着从中央银行到资产价格的高效传导和从资产价格到实体经济的低效传导，资产价格的波动损害了货币政策的传导效率以及金融体系的稳定性。在这种情况下，我国中央银行不应把资产价格纳入货币政策的最终目标，而应适时和适度地对资产价格作出反应。     

后危机时代美国货币政策的走势——兼论资产价格与货币政策操作规则

次贷危机使人们认识到,美联储货币政策操作失误难辞其咎。在全球化日益加深和美元为核心的国际货币体系下,美国不断下调利率的扩张性货币政策效应没有像过去那样迅速反映在商品价格上,而是主要表现为资产价格的攀升。由于美联储货币政策操作遵循了"泰勒规则"——把CPI当作最主要的监控对象,致使美联储错过了适时调整货币政策最佳的时机,导致美国信用扩张过度、资产泡沫,特别是房产泡沫不断升级。资产价格的上升最终会通过"财富效应"、"托宾q效应"、"金融加速器效应"等逐渐传导到商品价格上,随着石油等大宗商品价格的持续攀升,美联储开始急速提高利率,最终引发了次贷危机的爆发。后危机时代,美国的资产价格开始了迅速的回升,美联储应该吸取货币政策调整滞后的教训,适时地退出刺激,避免资产价格迅速上升和通货膨胀对经济复苏带来的不利影响。     

资产证券化对美国货币政策信用传导渠道的影响研究

本文通过分析美国资产证券化发展前后时期货币政策的效率,证明了货币政策对宏观经济变量的影响程度确实在减弱,从而证明因资产证券化的发展,信用渠道在货币政策传导机制中的作用在弱化。     

大国货币政策溢出效应与资产泡沫调控有效性研究

大国量化宽松货币政策造成国际流动性泛滥,大规模跨境资本流入中国催生资产泡沫.文章在梳理大国货币政策对中国金融市场溢出渠道的基础上,从理论层面建立跨国金融机构资金流动模型,分析不同渠道下的溢出效应,并通过反事实协方差矩阵估算溢出方式与程度.同时,进一步引入含有金融市场扭曲度的央行福利效用损失函数,分析在经济下行且资产价格...     

中美“宽松”货币政策、通胀预期与货币规则的探讨

2008年10月以来,中美两国均采取了不同程度的"宽松"货币政策来应对源于美国金融危机的全球经济衰退。本文的研究显示,2008年,中美两国货币供应量M1和M2增长率是相似的;2008年底到2009年8月,中国的M1和M2增长率分别为20.6%和21.4%,而美国的M1和M2增长率仅为3.36%和2.14%,中国的通胀预期是市场对"超级宽松"货币政策的合理反应。在过去的一年间,中国货币当局对美国金融危机的反应比美国的政策干预更为积极。而货币供应量的高增长孕育着价格上涨的风险,货币政策应当从被动协调美国的相机抉择转向遵循货币数量规则,抑制通胀预期,以实现宏观经济的稳定增长。     

Communication and Monetary Policy

Recent trends toward greater central bank independence and theadoption of formal inflation targeting by several countrieshave served to emphasize the importance of communication policy.In this paper, we explore some of the economic effects of publicinformation that arise whenever public information serves thedual role of conveying fundamental information as well as servingas a focal point for better coordination. More precise publicinformation is a double-edged tool. While it is very effectivein influencing actions through coordination, sometimes it canbe too effective, and coordinate actions away from fundamentals.     

The Interactions between Fiscal Policy and Monetary Policy

This paper studies the interactions of fiscal policy and monetarypolicy when they stabilize a single economy against shocks ina dynamic setting. If both policy-makers are benevolent, then,in our model, the best outcome is achieved when monetary policydoes nearly all of the stabilization. If the monetary authoritiesare benevolent, but the fiscal authority discounts the future,or aims for an excessive level of output, then a Nash equilibriumwill result in large welfare losses: after an inflation shockthere will be excessively tight monetary policy, excessive fiscalexpansion, and a rapid accumulation of public debt. However,if, in these circumstances, there is a regime of fiscal leadership,then the outcome will be very nearly as good as when both policy-makersare benevolent. Footnotes ¹ E-mail addresses: t.kirsanova{at}exeter.ac.uk; jari.stehn{at}bnc.ox.ac.uk;david.vines{at}economics.oxford.ac.uk     

International Monetary Policy Spillovers

Open Economies Review - This paper explores for spillovers from monetary policy in the United States to a number of advanced countries, namely Canada, Denmark, the Eurozone, Japan, Sweden,...     

The Impact of SNAP Vehicle Asset Limits on Household Asset Allocation

Beginning in 2001, states were given the authority to formulate their own rules on how vehicles are counted toward the asset limit in the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. We exploit differences in timing of the state vehicle asset policy changes to identify their effect on vehicle assets and debts, car ownership, liquid assets holdings, as well as non‐housing wealth. We estimate difference‐in‐differences and household fixed effects specifications and find that liberalizing vehicle asset rules increases vehicle assets of households with a high ex ante probability of program participation. Households also take on more debt to finance their vehicles. The increase in car value can be attributed primarily to less educated single parents who already owned a car before the policy change buying more expensive cars.     

Evaluating Monetary Policy Options

We present a procedure for evaluating ex ante the effects of alternative paths of a monetary policy tool (the federal funds rate in our illustrations) on output and the price level within a variant of a widely used vector autoregressive model of the U.S. economy. This exercise is a supplement to, or even an alternative to, analysis that relies on a particular structural model. Illustrations of the method are provided by evaluating the effects of changes in the funds rate target. Additionally, the Taylor rule is used to generate target funds rates for different target inflation rates, and the effects of these are evaluated.     

金融资产配置与股价信息含量

股价信息含量作为资本定价效率的重要体现，其对于抑制"脱实向虚"实现金融服务实体经济起着关键作用。文章着眼于我国企业大量配置金融资产这一现实，探究了其对股价信息含量的影响。基于2007-2017年中国A股上市公司数据的实证检验表明：金融资产具有"盈余管理"功能，管理层可能出于"盈余管理"动机配置金融资产，恶化公司信息环境，最终降低了股价信息含量。具体而言，企业通过操纵金融资产确认类别、公允价值估值及终止确认等方式达到盈余管理目的。当公司盈余管理动机较为强烈时，金融资产对股价信息含量的降低作用更加明显。完善的法律体制及有效的内部治理有助于缓解两者之间的负向关系。文章结论为我国企业持有金融资产提供了新解释，揭示了"脱实向虚"作用于实体经济的路径，同时丰富了会计政策选择的经济后果，为推动我国会计准则改革具有一定的启示意义。     

出其不意的央行货币政策

2006年8月18日,央行出其不意地上调了金融机构人民币存贷款基准利率。金融机构一年期存贷款基准利率上调0．27个百分点,其他各档次存贷款基准利率也相应调整,长期利率上调幅度大于短期利率上调幅度。同时,也规定对个人消费信贷利率有所优惠。     

再论中国货币政策与汇率政策的冲突

自1994年以来中国货币政策与汇率政策有三次冲突。根据笔者的研究,中国存在事实上的资本自由流动,根据这一结果和克鲁格曼“三元悖论"理论,中国的货币政策和汇率政策存在不可调和的冲突。从一定意义上讲,中国政府在经济决策方面必须就内部经济均衡和外部经济均衡何者优先的问题做出选择;对货币当局而言,人民币对内币值稳定和对外币值的稳定何者优先也同样是一个值得考虑的问题。谢平和张晓朴在2002年《国际经济评论》第3期上撰文《货币政策与汇率政策的三次冲突》,对1994―2000年中国货币政策与汇率政策的三次冲突进行了探讨。张斌在2004年…     

Optimal Monetary Policy in China

Using the structural vector autoregression model, we estimate the current responses of monetary policy to contemporaneous shocks from macroeconomic variables. Our findings indicate that the People's Bank of China responded to inflation and output changes, but did not react to asset price fluctuations during the period from January 1997 to March 2010. The optimal monetary responses to exogenous shocks are also examined. It is revealed that using asset prices to formulate monetary policy would not help to improve monetary authorities' performance in lowering the volatilities of output growth and inflation while keeping output growth and inflation in their safety zones. The effectiveness of monetary policy and fiscal policy in reacting to external shocks is also discussed.