前瞻性行为与员工的工作绩效——领导的正直性和团队政治氛围的调节作用

通过对北京某企业的40个项目部的190名员工的两阶段调查,文章运用跨层次分析方法探讨了员工针对自我和团队的前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的影响及其边界机制。研究结果表明：（1）员工针对自我和团队的前瞻性行为对员工的工作绩效有显著的正向影响;（2）领导的正直性调节了员工针对自我和团队的前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的影响,当领导的正直性较高时,员工针对自我和团队的前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的预测作用显著增强;（3）团队的政治氛围调节了员工针对团队的前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的影响,当团队的政治氛围较弱时,员工针对团队的前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的预测作用显著增强。文章进一步证实了前瞻性行为对员工工作绩效的积极影响,拓展了前瞻性行为发挥作用的边界条件,为营造一个鼓励员工前瞻性行为的氛围提供了重要的理论支撑。     

真实型领导与领导—成员匹配对工作繁荣的影响：社会嵌入视角

工作繁荣是个体成长和进步的标志，已成为组织管理领域日益关注的重要话题。文章从社会嵌入视角出发，探讨了真实型领导与领导-成员匹配对工作繁荣的影响，考察了真实型领导和领导-成员匹配如何通过工作繁荣的传导机制间接影响员工创新行为，并分析了差序氛围的调节效应。通过对200份有效问卷的实证分析表明：真实型领导与领导-成员匹配都对工作繁荣有显著正向影响；工作繁荣显著正向影响员工创新行为；工作繁荣在真实型领导与员工创新行为之间起完全中介作用，在领导-成员匹配与员工创新行为之间也起完全中介作用；差序氛围负向调节了领导-成员匹配对工作繁荣的影响，且负向调节了工作繁荣在领导-成员匹配与员工创新行为间的中介作用。研究结论不仅拓展了中国情境下有关工作繁荣的研究，而且为组织管理者如何促进员工工作繁荣提供了理论指导。     

领导授权赋能行为对“90后”员工创新绩效的影响研究——知识共享与组织支持感的作用

“90后”员工作为企业的中坚力量，已成为组织创新的关键来源。领导授权赋能行为通过权力下放能够使“90后”员工拥有更多的工作自主权，有利于创新绩效的产生。文章探究了领导授权赋能行为对“90后”员工创新绩效的影响路径及作用机制，结果显示：领导授权赋能行为显著正向影响“90后”员工创新绩效，知识共享起部分中介作用，组织支持感正向调节两者之间的关系。结合研究结果，为管理者提高“90后”员工创新绩效提供管理启示。     

差序式领导对知识型员工建设性越轨行为的影响机制研究

建设性越轨行为是员工在亲社会动机驱动下所表现的角色外行为,现已成为组织管理学界日益关注的重要问题,而差序式领导作为中国特有的领导风格之一,到底会促进还是抑制员工建设性越轨行为的结论不一。文章基于我国文化情景,以16家企业的394名知识型员工作为调研样本,构建差序式领导对建设性越轨行为影响的关系模型,鉴于员工动机和行为结果是由个体感知和组织环境刺激交互效应所导致,故引入个体层次的内生动机、内部人身份感知以及组织层次的团队动机氛围分别作为中介变量和调节变量。实证结果表明,差序式领导对建设性越轨行为具有显著正向影响,内生动机对该影响途径具有完全中介效应;差序式领导与建设性越轨行为的关系均受到内部人身份感知、精熟动机氛围的正向调节效应,受到绩效动机氛围的负向调节效应,且各部分调节效应均被内生动机所中介。研究结论揭示了差序式领导对知识型员工建设性越轨行为的影响机理,对指导组织管理者如何科学对待员工建设性越轨行为提供了理论指导和实践指引。     

威权领导与员工的时间侵占：工作嵌入负面影响的研究

文章基于资源保存理论,以273名员工为样本,探讨了威权领导是否会通过员工的情绪耗竭导致时间侵占行为的产生,并重点关注了工作嵌入的正向调节作用。结果表明：员工的情绪耗竭部分中介了威权领导对员工时间侵占行为的影响;工作嵌入正向调节威权领导与员工情绪耗竭之间的关系;工作嵌入正向调节员工情绪耗竭在威权领导和时间侵占行为之间的中介效应。研究结果有助于揭示时间侵占行为产生的内在机制和边界条件,以及工作嵌入可能存在的不利影响。     

支持型领导感知对员工绩效的影响路径研究

领导者在管理活动中发挥关键作用,其领导行为会极大地影响员工的工作态度、工作行为和工作绩效,进而影响组织的运作效率。通过以三家医院的医生和护士为样本的调研数据为基础,以支持型领导、知识共享、情感耗竭和工作绩效四部分建立概念模型研究了知识共享和情感耗竭对支持型领导对员工工作绩效的中介效应。结果表明:支持型领导对员工的工作绩效产生正向影响且知识共享和情感耗竭在支持型领导与员工工作绩效间一正一负均起到部分中介作用;领导应为员工提供支持营造良好的组织气氛来提高员工对组织的归属感,增加知识共享,降低员工的工作挫败感和压力从而提高员工的工作绩效。     

家长式领导对员工建言行为激励内化机制研究——中庸思维调节下的跨层次分析

员工建言作为角色外组织公民行为,有助于企业规避风险、提升组织绩效与创新绩效,推动组织变革.本文探究建言行为的激励内化过程与机制,考察领导、个体和文化价值观三个层面要素在此过程中的作用效果与范围,并展开实证检验.结果表明: 家长式领导通过上司支持感和心理安全感间接影响员工建言,其中心理安全感是建言行为发生的决定性因素;中庸思维正向调节上司支持感与建言行为之间的关系,高中庸水平的员工更容易在上司支持感的作用下提出促进型建言,而这一调节效应在心理安全感和建言行为的关系中并不显著.本文采用的跨层次研究有助于理解建言行为的触发、认知和决策过程以及建言理论本土文化的适用性.     

包容型领导对员工创新行为的影响：基于组织和谐的中介作用及组织创新氛围的调节作用

员工创新行为是组织塑造竞争优势的重要环节。尽管已有研究表明领导风格能够对员工创新行为产生显著影响,但目前对于二者之间的作用机制和边界条件却知之甚少。文章基于国内新能源行业422名在职人员的有效调查问卷数据,构建并检验一个被调节的中介效应模型。实证研究结果表明：包容型领导对员工创新行为具有显著正向影响;组织和谐能够在包容型领导与员工创新行为关系中起中介作用;组织创新氛围在包容型领导和组织和谐之间起着正向的调节作用,组织创新氛围越强,包容型领导对组织和谐的影响程度随之增强。文章解释了包容型领导对员工创新行为的作用机理,不仅打开了二者之间的“黑箱”,也为员工在组织中如何有效增强创新行为提供了管理启示和对策建议。     

顾客欺凌对酒店一线员工工作疏离感的影响机制——自我损耗视角的分析

作为服务交互中常见的负面行为,顾客欺凌对员工自我控制资源、心理资源以及工作热情具有不可忽视的消极影响。本文以自我损耗为视角,构建了一个有调节的中介模型,探讨顾客欺凌对酒店一线员工工作疏离感的影响及其内在机制。通过两阶段对19家高星级酒店中的522名一线员工进行追踪调研,结合数据分析对研究假设进行实证,结果显示:顾客欺凌对酒店一线员工工作疏离感具有显著的正向影响,而自我损耗在其中发挥部分中介作用;内外控倾向对顾客欺凌与员工自我损耗之间的关系起到显著的调节效应,并且内外控倾向对顾客欺凌与工作疏离感之间通过自我损耗的间接关系具有显著调节作用。从新的理论视角诠释顾客欺凌的负面效应,有利于厘清顾客欺凌影响酒店一线员工工作疏离感的内在机制和边界条件,为酒店管理实践提供更好的指导,进而实现酒店、员工和顾客互利共赢。     

浅谈家长式领导对企业员工建言行为的影响

在企业管理中企业员工的建言行为是企业领导者积极提倡的,通过员工积极意见和建议的提出,对企业领导效率的进一步提升有着重要影响。家长式领导,是具有中国特色的上级领导方式,对促进企业员工建言有着重要影响作用。本文将对员工建言行为以及家长式领导进行介绍,并着重探讨家长式领导对企业员工建言行为的影响。旨在通过本文论述为企业家长式领导方式的应用提供理论参考,促进企业员工积极建言,促进企业长远健康发展。     

The Impact of Paternalistic Leadership on Ethical Climate: The Moderating Role of Trust in Leader

The purpose of this empirical study is to investigate the effect of paternalistic leadership (PL) on ethical climate and the moderating role of trust in leader. Convenience sampling is used as a sampling procedure and the data were obtained from 227 Turkish employees. The findings indicated that PL had some effect on ethical climate. Furthermore, partial support was found for the moderating effect of trust in leader on the relationship between PL and ethical climate. The results of the study showed the importance of PL on employees in following company rules and procedures and showing a sense of responsibility and care to customers, community, and others in the organization.     

The Relationship Between Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Investigating the Role of Climate Regarding Ethics

One of the important factors influencing perceptions of the existence of an ethical climate is leader behaviors. It is argued that paternalistic leadership behaviors are developed to humanize and remoralize the workplace. In various studies, leadership behaviors and climate regarding ethics were evaluated as antecedents of organizational commitment. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between paternalistic leadership behaviors, climate regarding ethics and organizational commitment. Data were obtained from 142 individuals. Results indicated that benevolent paternalistic leadership had a moderate effect on affective commitment and strong effect on continuance commitment. Moreover, it was found that paternalistic leadership had an effect on the perception of an ethical climate. Strong relationship was found between climate regarding ethics and affective commitment; moderate relationship was found between climate regarding ethics and continuance commitment. Finally, results indicated that climate regarding ethics had a mediating effect between benevolent paternalistic leadership and affective commitment. Gül Selin Erben holds MA degree on Human Resources Management. She is a Phd candidate on Organizational Behavior field. She works as a research assistant at the Maltepe University. Ayşe Begüm Güneşer holds MA degree on Human Resources Management and she holds Phd degree on Organizational Behavior.     

Leaders’ Core Self-evaluation,Ethical Leadership,and Employees’ Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Employees’ Exchange Ideology

With the increasing demand for ethical standards in the current business environment, ethical leadership has received particular attention. Drawing on self-verification theory and social exchange theory, this study investigated the effect of leaders’ core self-evaluation on the display of ethical leadership and the moderating role of employees’ exchange ideology in the relationship between ethical leadership and employees’ job performance (i.e., task performance and organizational citizenship behavior). Consistent with the hypotheses, the results from a sample of 225 dyads of employees and their immediate leaders showed a positive relationship between leaders’ core self-evaluation and ethical leadership. Moreover, the results showed that ethical leadership mediates the effects of leaders’ core self-evaluation on employees’ job performance. Furthermore, we found that employees’ exchange ideology moderates the relationship between ethical leadership and job performance. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.     

Examining the within-person effects of abusive supervision on multifoci deviance: Ethical climate as a moderator

We examine the dynamic mechanism by which daily abusive supervision affects daily multifoci deviance through daily negative emotion and investigate the boundary conditions of this mechanism. Using a daily diary sample from 73 employees completed with quantitative responses for five consecutive weekdays, we find that daily abusive supervision has a significant positive effect on daily organization-, supervisor-, coworker-, and customer-directed deviance and that daily negative emotion mediates these relationships. A supplementary study reveals that the indirect effect of daily abusive supervision on daily supervisor-directed deviance mainly occurs via anger and that the indirect effect of daily abusive supervision on daily organization-, coworker-, and customer-directed deviance mainly occurs via general negative emotions (distress and nervousness). The moderation results show that instrumental climate has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between negative emotion and customer- and coworker-directed deviant behavior. A caring climate has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between negative emotion and organization-, supervisor-, and coworker-directed deviant behavior. The other moderation effects are not supported. These findings can be used to manage deviant workplace behaviors.     

Service climate and employee service performance: exploring the moderating role of job stress and organizational identification

Drawing on a sample of 368 frontline employees and 45 managers from five Chinese banks, this study examined the relationship between service climate and frontline employee service performance, including in-role and extra-role performance, and the difference of this relationship considering the moderating role of employee's emotional experience (job stress and organizational identification). Empirical results indicated the positive effect of service climate on service performance as hypothesized. Moreover, job stress negatively moderated the relationship between service climate and extra-role performance, while organizational identification positively moderated the climate–performance relationship.