RISK DIFFERENCES AND FINANCIAL REPORTING

Financial leverage as reported by a consolidated financial statement may differ substantially from leverage for the parent company. To assess the financial risk for the parent (not the consolidated entity), employing consolidated data is hazardous; the problem is magnified by the fact that virtually all firms report only consolidated data. Consolidated leverage almost always equals or exceeds parent leverage for a wholly owned subsidiary, and many firms reporting only consolidated data have betas significantly greater than otherwise comparable firms that report both consolidated and parent company information.     

ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNMENTAL FINANCIAL REPORTING

Accountability is the cornerstone of Governmental Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GGAAP) in the United States according to the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). This paper analyzes the implications of alternative definitions of the concept of accountability for GGAAP and for GASB. It also discusses the costs and benefits of accountability information, the effect of diverse users of governmental reports, and alternative mechanisms for achieving accountability in governments. Finally, a governmental accounting research agenda based on accountability is proposed for the future.     

ASSET PRICING WITH IN- AND OUTFLOW CONSTRAINTS: THEORY AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SWEDEN

The paper analyzes asset pricing and portfolio choice when domestic investors collectively cannot hold foreign assets beyond a maximum value. We add the constraint that foreign investors cannot hold more than a fraction of the shares of domestic assets. Consistent with Swedish stock market data, both domestic and foreign investors pay premiums for investing in the other country's assets. Some empirical observations are inconsistent with the CAPM framework.     

EXAMINING MERGER SYNERGY WITH THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL

This paper analyzes the impact of mergers on the alphas and betas of actual merged firms compared to those of the homemade mergers an investor could have created by buying proportional shares of the two firms. The results provide some evidence of merger synergy. Where alpha and beta shifts were observed, the evidence did not indicate that either the relative size of target firms or concurrent capital structure changes were related to these shifts as current theory suggests. There is weak evidence that nonconglomerate mergers were more frequently synergistic.