2005～2010年《金融论坛》载文统计分析

作者对<金融论坛>2005～2010年共计761篇栽文进行了定量研究,通过对载文的研究内容、研究方法、基金项目、作者所属地域、作者所在单位、合著情况、参考文献及被引频次等方面的统计分析发现:信贷业务及其风险管理是历年来<金融论坛>商业银行应用理论研究的重点;从研究方法来看,栽文研究采用的方法以非数字化的定性研究为主,但...     

《金融论坛》2014年重点选题

根据中国知网的最新统计,2010~2012年,《金融论坛》的"期刊综合影响因子"分别为0.419、0.493和0.504,年均增长0.043;"人文社科统计源期刊引用影响因子"分别为0.411、0.476和0.493,年均增长0.041;2011~2012年,《金融论坛》的期刊他引影响因子由0.377上升为0.409,被引频次由423上升为517,被引半衰期由4.2上升为4.6。在2012年"货币/金融、银行/保险"学科共58种期刊的"影响     

《金融论坛》2015年重点选题

近年来,《金融论坛》在学术界的影响力逐步上升。据中国知网的统计,2010~2013年,《金融论坛》的"期刊综合影响因子"分别为0.419、0.493、0.511、0.558;"人文社会科学统计源期刊引用影响因子"分别为0.411、0.476、0.493、0.547。同时,《金融论坛》的他引影响因子、被引频次、被引半衰期等多项指标均比上年有明显增加。在2014年11月22日公布的中国人文社会科学期刊评价结果中,《金融论坛》被评为63种经济学核心期刊之一。为了深化金融领域相关问题的研究,本刊编辑部选择了以下重点选题,欢迎各界作者就这些选题向本刊踊跃投稿:     

《金融论坛》2016年重点选题

近几年,《金融论坛》在学术界的影响力逐步上升。据中国知网2015年10月公布的统计数据,2010~2014年,《金融论坛》的"期刊综合影响因子"分别为0.419、0.493、0.511、0.558、0.731,"人文社科统计源期刊引用影响因子"分别为0.411、0.476、0.493、0.547、0.731,同时,《金融论坛》的他引影响因子、被引频次、被引半衰期等多项指标均比上年有明显增加。在最近一次公布的     

《金融论坛》2016年重点选题北大核心CSSCI

近几年,《金融论坛》在学术界的影响力逐步上升。据中国知网2015年10月公布的统计数据,2010～2014年,《金融论坛》的“期刊综合影响因子”分别为0．419、0．493、0．511、0．558、0．731“人文社科统计源期刊引用影响因子”分别为0．411、0．476、0．493、0．547、0．731,同时,《金融论坛》的他引影响因子、被引频次、被引半衰期等多项指标均比上年有明显增加。在最近一次公布的中国人文社会科学期刊评价结果中,《金融论坛》被评为63种经济学核心期刊之一。     

《金融论坛》2016年重点选题北大核心CSSCI

近几年,《金融论坛》在学术界的影响力逐步上升。据中国知网2015年10月公布的统计数据,2010～2014年,《金融论坛》的“期刊综合影响因子”分别为0．419、0．493、0．511、0．558、0．731,“人文社科统计源期刊引用影响因子”分别为0．411、0．476、0．493、0．547、0．731,同时,《金融论坛》的他引影响因子、被引频次、被引半衰期等多项指标均比上年有明显增加。     

《金融论坛》2016年重点选题北大核心CSSCI

近几年,《金融论坛》在学术界的影响力逐步上升。据中国知网2015年10月公布的统计数据,2010～2014年,《金融论坛》的“期刊综合影响因子”分别为0．419、0．493、0．511、0．558、0．731,“人文社科统计源期刊引用影响因子”分别为0．411、O．476、0．493、0．547、0．731,同时,《金融论坛》的他引影响因子、被引频次、被引半衰期等多项指标均比上年有明显增加。     

《中国资产评估》期刊引文及被引分析——以1996~2012年载文为例简

本文研究的目的是了解《中国资产评估》期刊在学术研究领域与信息传播中的影响力水平,揭示其内在的规律及个性特征,并为其他学者的研究和本刊的管理提供参考与借鉴。本文运用引文分析法对《中国资产评估》期刊1996—2012年刊发文章的引文和被引用情况进行了研究。通过对本刊的载文量、下载量、引文率、被引率、半衰期和普赖斯指数等指标的统计分析,显示：本刊的影响力和受关注度逐渐提高;本刊文章最活跃、最有生命力的时期是在其发表后2-6年,而且文献老化速度慢;同时还确定了本刊引用和被引的核心期刊。     

漯河市金融学会成功举办“漯河食品工业与金融支持”论坛

<正>2007年11月14日,漯河市金融学会举办了"漯河食品工业与金融支持"论坛。辖区各县支行、市级金融机构的相关负责人,市社科联、市发改委、中小企业局、农业局领导及市属农业产业化龙头企业负责人共70多人参加论坛。会议收到论文32篇,     

鄂豫皖三省七市“金融支持与劳务经济发展论坛”成功举办

<正>2007年10月11日至12日,由金融时报社、河南省金融学会联合主办,人民银行信阳市中心支行承办的"金融支持与劳务经济发展论坛"在河南省信阳市成功举办。来     

2000~2009年《财经理论与实践》学术轨迹及被引定量研究

运用词频统计及共现方法分析了2000~2009年国内学术期刊《财经理论与实践》所发表的2000余篇论文的所有关键词及被引情况,得出该刊近10年的学术轨迹情况、被相关期刊的引用情况、高影响力作者及高影响力论文的情况。研究结果反映了国内金融学研究领域的现状、特征及动向。     

UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal Quality

The process of research quality assessment is now firmly established in UK universities. The quality of the journals in which academic papers are published is an important input to the assessment process. The relative quality of these journals is clearly difficult to establish in an objective manner. This paper contributes to the debate about relative quality by conducting a peer review. Eighty-eight UK accounting academics reported their degree of familiarity with, and perceptions of quality of, a total of 44 journals in the accounting and finance discipline. Accounting and Business Research and theBritish Accounting Review were the two most familiar academic journals. The most highly ranked journals were generally from the US.     

Discovering the ‘international’ in accounting and finance

As higher education in accounting and finance moves increasingly in the direction of internationalisation of degree programmes and student populations, this paper reflects on the ways in which contemporary research contributes to the academic community's understanding of the rich potential of evidence available on international convergence and diversity.Reviews of research published in recent years have pointed to strong parochiality in the research questions and data choices of many researchers. This paper looks for a meta-structure of cross-sectional international comparisons across a range of papers at one point in time. Research papers of 2005 are selected from eight journals giving a broad coverage of subject matter.A cultural framework is proposed as a basis for an ethnographic view of the data and findings of empirical research papers. Cultural diversity is found as an explicit discussion in some papers but others are silent or even apologetic for cultural differences.Country-specific studies reveal the potential for comparative studies on a wider geographical basis but the achievement of such an aim will require the academic research community (editors, reviewers and authors) to show flexibility in dealing with smaller data sets and greater uncertainty about the nature of accounting information. Most importantly this review shows the considerable wealth of interest waiting for those who take time to peruse academic journals.     

Accounting and Finance at forty: a retrospective evaluation

Accounting and Finance has evolved from a news bulletin to a full-grown refereed academic journal that has published papers written by authors from Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America, Canada, Europe and Asia. The Journal published its 41^st volume in 2001 and that anniversary issue coincides with the beginning of the new millennium. As part of the celebration of this important milestone, this article reviews the Journal's evolution, the variety of papers published and the Journal's impact on accounting and finance research in the Asia Pacific region. Data for 394 papers published in the Journal by 570 authors are analysed. I find that the distribution of institutions and authors that have published in the Journal is highly skewed, with the top five (11) institutions accounting for 35 per cent (51 per cent) of the published papers in the Journal. Similarly, 8 per cent of the authors have published 26 per cent of the articles in the Journal. Analysis of the citation pattern indicates that Accounting and Finance does not have much impact on research published in the Asia Pacific region, with the Journal accounting for only 1.06 per cent of all citations in the selected Asia Pacific journals. Sub-period analysis indicates that not even the establishment of the editorial board in the latter half of the 1990s has helped improve the impact of the Journal on research published in the Asia Pacific region. However, compared with other Asia-Pacific journals, Accounting and Finance has the strongest impact on publications in the selected journals. The impact is even stronger in the latter half of the 1990s. Also, the impact of Accounting and Finance on the more recent journals in the Asia Pacific region is stronger than that of the other more established journals.     

Book Reviews

Book reviewed in this article: BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Financial Management: Cases. By LAWRENCE GITMAN and EDWARD A. MOSES. BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Principles of Financial Management. By Seymour Friedland. BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Options: Theory and Practice. By Claude A. Henin and Peter J. Ryan. BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Investments: An Introduction to Analysis and Management. By FREDERICK AMLING. BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Personal Finance. By Lawrence J. Gitman. BUSINESS FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS: Winning with Money: A Guide to Your Future By Beryl W. Sprinkel and Robert J. Genetski. PUBLIC FINANCE: Foreign Exchange Today. Raymond G. F. Coninx. FINANCIAL MARKETS: Review of Substituting a Value-Added Tax for the Corporate Income Tax: First Round Analysis (NBER Fiscal Studies 15) by Stephen P. Dresch, An-Loh Lin, and David K. Stout. FINANCIAL MARKETS: Duke Law Journal, Municipal Finance: The Duke Law Journal Symposium INTERNATIONAL FINANCE: Dorrance, Graeme S. National Monetary and Financial Analysis MISCELLANEOUS: Creating New Financial Instruments for the Aged by Jack M. Guttentag.     

Paradigms in accounting research: A view from North America

The highest ranked U.S. business schools value, almost exclusively, publications in academic journals deemed to be “A-level” and high quantities of SSCI citations. But the so-called A-level journals, which typically are said to be five in number or less, publish predominantly empirical tests of economics-based models using large, archival data sets. Motivating researchers to publish papers that are situated only in these journals and that gather high quantities of SSCI citations, which are more likely if the publications are in mainstream topic areas, reduces topic, discipline, and research method diversity. The loss of diversity is costly to the schools themselves, the academy and, indeed, society. The narrow focus of the U.S. business schools provides a great opportunity for business schools in Europe and other parts of the world to take a leadership position in many important research areas. But that opportunity will be lost if those schools try to emulate the U.S. business school model.     

The Ultimate Irrelevance Proposition in Finance?

I survey 457 published papers in top finance journals across two decades to assess whether these papers misuse tests of significance. More than 80% of published studies are diligent about distinguishing between statistical and economic significance and quantifying and interpreting the economic magnitudes of the statistical relationships they measure. Yet, only 10% of these acknowledge limits to the power of their tests and even fewer do anything about them. Recent demographic trends in publishing, such as larger co‐author teams and increased participation by non‐North American scholars, women, and those outside the top finance departments are not associated with these outcomes.     

PUBLISHING IN PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING JOURNALS: ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE 1987–96

There is considerable interest both in the publishing activities of academics and in the relevance of research to accounting practitioners. This study introduces a fresh perspective to the debate by examining the publishing performance of British academic institutions in professional journals over the period 1987 to 1996 and the possible influence of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) on this performance. To carry out the research, an analysis was conducted of all articles attributed to academics and appearing in the journals of the five main professional bodies in Great Britain. Two measures of publication performance were used: volume, based on the total number of articles appearing in the period; and regularity, being the number of years in which members of staff of academic institutions appeared in print. The results indicate that a substantial proportion of the 750 articles published in the 10 year period can be attributed to a relatively small number of academic institutions. An examination of the 10 year period reveals that there was reduced publishing activity in professional journals in the year prior to the three RAEs and that activity did not subsequently return to its previous level. When the first five year period is compared to the second there is a decline in productivity and significant changes in the institutions appearing in the analysis. Although the data is fragile, there is no evidence that publishing in professional journals is associated with particularly high or low research ratings. It is noticeable, however, that the names of few of our leading institutions rarely appear in the professional journals.