首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
This contribution aims to couple national institutional complementarities to issues of regional development and long-term sustainability in Southeast Asia’s non-core regions. A comparison is made of Satun in Southern Thailand and Perlis in Northern Malaysia. Based on fieldwork data, the findings reveal that Malaysian institutional complementarities result from a key role of the state, leading to potentially ineffective forms of economic activity. On the Thai side, institutional complementarities give free reign to entrepreneurs, but they are less conducive for inclusive regional development and addressing environmental concerns. Based on the case studies, findings of a more general applicability highlight two additional issues. First, balanced regional development requires a set of institutional complementarities that integrates economic growth with distributional strategies. Second, more attention should be paid to the adaptability of institutional arrangements as they may actually “lock in” regions in an unsustainable development trajectory in the long run, be it in economic, social or ecological terms.
Guus van WestenEmail:

Edo Andriesse   (PhD, Utrecht University) was a PhD Candidate at International Development Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, between September 2003 and November 2007. The research project was concerned with a comparative analysis of institutions and regional development at the Thailand/Malaysia border. He now teaches economics at International College, Khon Kaen University in Thailand. Guus van Westen   (PhD, Utrecht University) is Assistant Professor at International Development Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. He teaches a wide range of development and human geography courses. Furthermore, he conducts research and publishes on regional development in Southeast Asia and India. He was also editor of the internationally refereed journal TESG.  相似文献   

2.
“Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence” (Meyer, 2006) generated a surprisingly extended and diverse set of responses from Asia and beyond. In this rejoinder, I draw together a few lines of arguments that have emerged in that debate with the aim of moving the debate—and thus Asian management research agendas—forward. In particular, I argue that context is a crucial variable to explain management behavior, yet for practical reasons, it has been neglected in research published in top journals. Thus, I challenge management scholars in Asia and beyond to devise new research strategies to enhance our understanding of the contextual boundaries of our knowledge.
Klaus E. MeyerEmail: URL: www.klausmeyer.co.uk

Klaus E. Meyer   (PhD, London Business School) is currently Professor of Strategy and International Business at the University of Bath. He has previously served 8 years on the faculty of Copenhagen Business School, and held visiting appointments at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and National Cheng-chi University, Taipei. His research focuses on the strategies of multinational enterprises in emerging economies, especially foreign entry and growth strategies in Eastern Europe and East Asia. He has a personal website at . This is Professor Meyer’s third contribution to APJM.  相似文献   

3.
The emergence of knowledge-intensive society has changed the nature of business competition. Knowledge management becomes an important managerial task and formulating a sound innovation strategy is an integral part of strategic management. Adopting an institution-based view, this article argues that the institutional environment in the Asia Pacific region plays a multi-faceted role behind firms’ knowledge management and innovation strategy. Specifically, institutions impose rules for legitimacy, serve as a source of knowledge, and allocate incentives and resources for innovation. We believe that future research drawing on the institution-based view has significant potential to advance our understanding of knowledge management and innovation strategy in Asia Pacific firms.
Mike W. PengEmail:

Yuan Lu   (PhD, University of Aston) is a professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and works in the areas of corporate diversification, business groups, and institutional entrepreneurship. He is on the editorial board of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Eric W. K. Tsang   (PhD, University of Cambridge) is an associate professor at the University of Texas at Dallas. He is a Senior Editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and is on the editorial boards of five other journals, including the Academy of Management Journal and the Academy of Management Review. He has published over 50 journal articles. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His market-leading text, Global Strategy (South-Western Thomson, 2006), has been translated into Chinese and Portuguese, and his new Global Business text (South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009) has recently been launched.  相似文献   

4.
Drawing from transaction cost economics and strategic management, this paper develops a series of propositions that link market failure with corporate strategy. In doing so, the paper focuses on both vertical and horizontal strategies as strategic approaches that could be used to address different types of market failure. The significant contribution of the paper lies in its deconstruction of the various types of market failure and developing a theoretically grounded set of propositions that identifies appropriate corporate strategic responses that can be used to ameliorate the negative consequences of each type of failure. In doing so it also explores the evolution of business groups and the viability of strategic choices that groups are likely to make as they navigate the emerging market terrain.
Barbara S. Pécherot PetittEmail:

Mingfang Li   (PhD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) is Professor of Management at California State University, Northridge. He also is Distinguished Visiting Professor at Hohai University, Nanjing, China, and Visiting Professor at Xian Jiaotong University, Xian, China. Mingfang Li’s research and teaching focus on strategic management, global strategy, and technology and innovation management. His recent research examines strategies from emerging economies. Mingfang Li taught at various executive seminars in China, and delivered talks at various business programs. Kannan Ramaswamy   (PhD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) is William D. Hacker Chair Professor of Management at Thunderbird. His current research interests focus on issues of critical relevance to emerging markets such as the evolution of multinationals from developing countries and the role of business groups in emerging markets. Parallel with his research interests, his teaching assignments cover similar topics within the realm of global strategy. He has taught in executive development programs for many of the world’s leading companies and also in academic programs at several global institutions. Barbara S. Pécherot Petitt   (PhD, University of Grenoble, France) is Associate Professor of Finance at CERAM Sophia Antipolis. Previously she was Assistant Professor of Finance at Thunderbird. She specializes in corporate finance, valuation, mergers, and acquisitions. Prior to joining Thunderbird, she spent two years with Financial Services Management Development Limited as a consultant, and worked for several banks and companies in London and abroad.  相似文献   

5.
Despite the increasing recognition of the importance of the research mission of universities, no previous work has investigated the research productivity and research strategies of Asia Pacific business schools. This article fills this important gap by conducting the first study to rank the publication productivity of 130 Asia Pacific business schools. Drawing on data from the UTD Top 100 Business School Research Rankings™ and several additional sources, we rank Asia Pacific business schools’ research productivity in three areas: (1) twenty-four leading business journals, (2) seven top management journals, and (3) five Asia Pacific management journals. We also extend this analysis by documenting the distinct publishing strategies of various Asia Pacific business schools—global, local, or both.
David H. WengEmail:

Ram Mudambi   (PhD, Cornell University) is Professor and Perelman Senior Research Fellow at Temple University and Visiting Professor of International Business at the University of Reading. His research interests focus on knowledge/innovation management and international entrepreneurship. Mike W. Peng   (PhD, University of Washington) is the Provost’s Distinguished Professor of Global Strategy at the University of Texas at Dallas and Editor-in-Chief of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. His research interests are global strategy, international business, and emerging economies. David H. Weng   is a PhD student at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include institutional theory and international management.  相似文献   

6.
In commenting Meyer’s article “Asian management research needs more self-confidence” in APJM (2006), Yang and Terjesen (Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4):497–507, 2007) described ground realities in Australia that may have inhibited the development of a robust management research community. As an Australia-trained and Australia-based Asian management scholar, I extend the “P” perspective by exploring how the formal and informal institutions interact in shaping Australia-based scholars’ publication strategies and research performance. Reflecting on my experience in Australia, I argue that like in any other businesses, institutions matter in our business of research and publication. They matter because they can shape the local “rule of the game” within which a country’s or a region’s scholars conduct and publish their research. A full institutional account of the current state of management research in the Asia Pacific region requires a deeper understanding of both formal and informal local institutions. From such an institutional perspective, this commentary concentrates on why Australian management research lags behind that in the US and Europe and yet leads the Asia Pacific region.
Yue WangEmail:
  相似文献   

7.
In this article we reflect on the adolescent years of Asia management research published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management (APJM) by reviewing work published in the past 10 years (1997–2006). We report that during the last decade, APJM has published 223 research articles, written by 373 different authors, who are affiliated with 203 different institutions. Our discussion of the future of Asia management research is guided by Kuhn’s (Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962) perspective on the nonlinear progression of science. We argue that as a growing community, Asia management research is finding its “identity” and establishing its presence in the larger worldwide management research community. Following our analysis, we conclude that the growth of Asia management research—as captured by APJM publications—throughout its “adolescent” years has set forth a challenging and exciting path for the future. All authors contributed equally. We thank Mike Peng (Editor-in-Chief) for his encouragement and advice. This work was completed when Yu-Shan Su was a Fulbright visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). She thanks the Fulbright Association and the Taiwanese Ministry of Education for partially funding this work.
Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-MilesEmail:
Ramya R. AroulEmail:
Sunny Li SunEmail:
Yu-Shan Su (Corresponding author)Email:

Erin G. Pleggenkuhle-Miles   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include institutional effects on firm strategies and rural entrepreneurship. Ramya R. Aroul   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests include organization strategy and evolution of new industries in emerging economies and rural entrepreneurship. Sunny Li Sun   is a PhD student in International Management Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas. His research interests include strategy on internationalization, M&A, alliance network and innovation. Yu-Shan Su   (PhD, National Taiwan University) is Assistant Professor of International Business at Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan. During 2006–07, she was a Fulbright visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Dallas. Her research interests are innovation and knowledge management in organizations and R&D management in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry.  相似文献   

8.
The first decade of the Asia Academy of Management   总被引:5,自引:5,他引:0  
This paper briefly reviews the history of the Asia Academy of Management, the official sponsor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. It is suggested that establishing the Asia Academy of Management is a response to the new challenges of the academic institutional environment, both in Asia and in the mainstream management research community. Judging from the achievements in terms of reputation in the region, publication citations, school rankings, and internal organizational development, this new venture has added significant value to the global academic community. The challenges facing the Asia Academy, however, include the need to attract more interested parties to actively involve in its activities, more genuine cooperation among Asian and non-Asian institutions, and a need to affirm the contributions of Asian management studies.
Chung-Ming LauEmail:

Chung-Ming Lau   (PhD, Texas A&M University) is professor in the Department of Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He was the founding President of the Asia Academy of Management, where he served as President during 1998–2006 and now serves as its Secretary. He has also served on the editorial board of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management from 2002 to 2007, including one term as Senior Editor (2004–2007). His teaching and research interests include strategic change, organization culture, and management of Chinese organizations. He has published in the Academy of Management Journal, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Management International Review, Organization Science, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, and other major journals in management and international business.  相似文献   

9.
Asian management research needs broader initiatives and focused incentives   总被引:8,自引:8,他引:0  
Meyer (2006) has offered an interesting array of initiatives that scholars in Asia can pursue in enhancing their contribution to the body of management knowledge. While the objective of his agenda seems timely and relevant, it raises some fundamental questions that encompass issues such as the scope of research questions that Asian researchers could pursue, the debate over rigor versus relevance, and the role of established top tier journals in furthering the Asian management research agenda. This paper discusses some of these issues in the spirit of fostering a continued dialog on the important questions that Meyer raises.
Kannan RamaswamyEmail:

Kannan Ramaswamy   (PhD, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) is a William D. Hacker Chair Professor of Management at Thunderbird. His current research interests focus on issues such as the evolution of multinationals from developing countries and the role of business groups in emerging economies. He has taught in academic programs at several leading global institutions and in executive development programs for many of the world’s leading companies.  相似文献   

10.
Real options and MNE strategies in Asia Pacific   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
Asia Pacific offers a lot of promising growth opportunities, but it also presents high levels of uncertainty for multinational enterprises (MNEs). In this paper, we introduce real options theory as a theory of investment under uncertainty, and we discuss its implications for MNEs and their strategies with a focus on the emerging economies in Asia Pacific. We suggest that MNEs must recognize the various sources of uncertainty, as well as the various options embedded in their investments, and real options theory can help them structure and design their investments to benefit from uncertainty. In particular, MNEs need to develop the dynamic capabilities of managing real options in their investments to respond to the evolving economic and institutional environment in the region. This paper also provides several implications for policy makers in Asia Pacific to stimulate investment activities in the region and to help their firms venture successfully in the international market place.
Jing LiEmail:

Tony W. Tong   is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at the Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado. He obtained his Ph.D. from The Ohio State University. His current research applies real options theory to study firms’ corporate development activities and growth initiatives. His research in these areas has been published or accepted in journals such as the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of International Business Studies, and Organization Science. Jing Li   is an Assistant Professor of International Business at the Faculty of Business Administration at Simon Fraser University, Canada. Her research focuses on alliance activities in China, capability building of Chinese firms, and applications of real options theory to international strategy. Her research in these areas has appeared in the Journal of World Business, Advances in Strategic Management, and Managerial and Decision Economics.  相似文献   

11.
Venture capital in China: Past,present, and future   总被引:8,自引:6,他引:2  
This article reviews the literature on venture capital in China and examines where China’s venture capital industry has been and where it is likely to go in the future. Since the 1980s, venture capital in China has grown steadily alongside the robust national economy. The future is likely to offer even greater opportunities, as entrepreneurs are encouraged and property rights improve. However, there will also be a period of transition as the market continues to mature and as new legal structures and commercial arrangements emerge. Venture capital in China has many interesting differences from that in Western countries. The venture capital industry is shaped by the institutional context and China is no exception to this. This article also examines some specific differences between the system in China and that of the United States. Future prospects for venture capital are also appraised as China continues its transition to a market economy.
Kuang S. YehEmail:

David Ahlstrom   (PhD, New York University) is a professor in the Management Department at The Chinese University of Hong Kong where he has taught for 11 years in international management and human resources. His research interests include international management and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Professor Ahlstrom has published over 50 refereed articles in publications such as The Academy of Management Review, the Journal of Business Venturing, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management where he is currently a senior editor. Garry D. Bruton   (PhD, Oklahoma) is a professor of entrepreneurship at the Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University. His research focuses on entrepreneurship in emerging markets. He has published over 50 academic articles in journals such as The Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, and Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Professor Bruton has also co-authored two textbooks published by Thomson-Southwestern. He is currently an associate editor of the Academy of Management Perspectives and is a senior editor of the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Kuang S. Yeh   (PhD, Carnegie Mellon) is a professor and chairman of the Department of Business Management at the National Sun Yat-Sen University in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. His areas of interest are in organization theory, corporate governance, business ethics, and entrepreneurship and venture capital. Professor Yeh has published in journals such as the Journal of World Business, International Business Review and a number of academic journals in Taiwan. He is currently studying issues of firm growth and change in China’s and Taiwan’s private enterprises.  相似文献   

12.
A strategic analysis of surging Chinese manufacturers: The case of Galanz   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
Recent years have witnessed the surging of Chinese manufacturers, as China has become the world’s factory floor. This paper presents a case study of one of the most successful manufacturers in China, the Galanz Group, now the world’s largest microwave manufacturer. Based on theories of multinational corporations from emerging economies, the paper examines the process of Galanz’s integration into the global market. The company has developed unique competitive strategies that have made it a great success within China and in overseas markets. The Galanz model suggests strong strategic implications for both Chinese firms and incumbent multinational corporations.
Daniel Z. DingEmail:
  相似文献   

13.
This paper examines the antecedents of felt trust, an under-explored area in the trust literature. We hypothesized that subordinates’ felt trust would relate positively with their leaders’ moral leadership behaviors and negatively with autocratic leadership behaviors and demographic differences between leaders and themselves. We also hypothesized the above relationships to be mediated by the leader-member value congruence. Results supported our hypotheses that value congruence mediated between autocratic leadership behaviors and demographic differences and subordinates’ felt trust, but not moral leadership behaviors, which had direct effects on subordinates’ perception of feeling trusted. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Ping Ping FuEmail:

Dora C. Lau   (PhD, University of British Columbia) is an assistant professor of management at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research interests include demographic diversity and faultlines, rational trust, team dynamics, chain store management, and Chinese management. Her current research projects include faultline dynamics in small teams, trust reciprocity within vertical dyads, and the relationship between leadership and trust networks. Jun Liu   (PhD, Chinese University of Hong Kong) is an assistant professor in the OB and HR Department, School of Business, Renmin University of China. His research interests include leadership, psychological contact and research methods in managament. Ping Ping Fu   (PhD, State University of New York, Albany) is an associate professor of management at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Her research interests are mainly in executive leadership. She is the coordinator for the Chinese part of the Global Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness (GLOBE) project.  相似文献   

14.
With multinational corporations increasingly seeking subsidiaries’ specific advantages in foreign countries to develop their innovative capabilities, internationalization of research and development has been greatly emphasized. However, in emerging economies, managers are encountering the challenge of high employee mobility under the weak intellectual property protection regime. This article investigates subsidiaries’ employee mobility and proposes that it negatively moderates the relationship between location advantages and the level of subsidiaries’ R&D. This article extends R&D internationalization and enhances current understanding of subsidiaries’ R&D activities. Further, it provides managerial implications as to how managers can improve R&D outcome by mitigating obstacles in emerging economies.
Crystal X. JiangEmail:
  相似文献   

15.
Business groups in East Asia: Post-crisis restructuring and new growth   总被引:9,自引:7,他引:2  
Business groups played an important role in the economic development of East Asian countries. Yet business groups in East Asia face an uncertain future. Following the Asian Crisis, foreign creditors and investors have demanded that business groups have more transparent operations and stronger corporate governance. At the same time, as governments in East Asia have loosened trade barriers, business groups have become subject to intense competition in domestic markets. This paper argues that business groups can survive or even prosper by taking initiatives in corporate restructuring. This paper also highlights some areas for further research on business groups in this region.
Sea-Jin ChangEmail:

Sea-Jin Chang   is currently Kumho Asiana Group Chaired Professor of Business Administration, Korea University. He received his PhD in management from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Previously, he was a faculty member of New York University. He also had visiting appointments at Stanford, INSEAD, and London Business School. Professor Chang is primarily interested in the management of diversified multinational enterprises. His research interests include diversification, corporate restructuring, foreign direct investment organizational learning, corporate growth through joint ventures and acquisitions, and comparative management studies of Japan, Korea and China.  相似文献   

16.
This paper explores several features of, and changes in, innovation capacity in Asia. The growth of technology-based industries has been a critically important element of Asian industrial development and has required extensive institutional support for the diffusion of innovation and technological learning. As a number of Asian countries reach the global technological frontier they need to develop new capabilities for creating “radical” innovations in order to sustain their international competitiveness. Using the analytical frameworks of national innovation systems and varieties of capitalism, the paper reviews some systemic and environmental factors encouraging and constraining these developments. By referring to illustrative case studies of institutional evolution within Taiwan’s national innovation system and technological entrepreneurship in Korea, the paper argues that whilst there are major developments in models of innovation support, emulating those found in liberal market economies, enduring cultural legacies can remain influential. It highlights the central importance of social as well as economic institutional adaptation. Some management and policy implications of this attribute are considered, and a future research agenda is proposed.
Mark DodgsonEmail:

Mark Dodgson   (PhD, Imperial College London) is Professor of Management and Director of the Technology and Innovation Management Centre at the University of Queensland Business School. The focus of his work over the past 25 years has been studying corporate strategies and government policies for technological innovation. He has produced ten books and over 100 academic articles on innovation. Mark is a member of the editorial boards of eight innovation journals and is Editor-in-Chief of Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice. He is a Visiting Professor at Imperial College London and an International Fellow at the UK’s Advanced Institute of Management Research. He is a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia, the Royal Society of Arts, and the Australian Institute of Management. His current research addresses the impact of visualization technologies and playfulness on work and organization, and the dynamics of national innovation systems. He is regularly asked to speak at international conferences, and has done so in over 40 countries. His latest book is The Management of Technological Innovation (Dodgson, Gann and Salter, Oxford University Press, 2008).  相似文献   

17.
Asian management in the 21st century   总被引:19,自引:14,他引:5  
Contrary to popular opinion, the crucial elements of the management process show strong continuity over time, but differ from one country to another, as a function of the local culture. Recent research reveals fundamental differences in the goals of business leaders from different societies. The article explores general characteristics of Asian management as opposed to management elsewhere, and what the study of Asian management and its cultural origins mean for the emerging Asian multinationals and for the state of the art in management research worldwide in the twenty-first century.
Geert HofstedeEmail:

Geert Hofstede   (PhD, University of Groningen) is a Professor Emeritus of the University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. Since the publication of his book Culture’s Consequences (1980, 2001), he has been a pioneer of comparative intercultural research; his ideas are used worldwide. A student-level book Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (1991, new edition 2005 with Gert Jan Hofstede) has so far appeared in 17 languages. He is one of the most cited European authors in the Social Sciences Citation Index. He is a Doctor Honoris Causa of four European Universities, a Honorary Fellow of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, and a Fellow of the Academy of Management as well as of the Center for Economic Research at the University of Tilburg. This is Professor Hofstede’s third contribution to APJM after Hofstede (1984a, 1984b). His website is www.geerthofstede.nl  相似文献   

18.
Many of the world’s firms have a familial dimension; including some of the most dynamic and emerging markets of East Asia. However, this important aspect of organizing economic activity remains understudied and misunderstood. A central theme of this article is that while families matter in economic activity throughout the world, they matter in different ways depending on the institutional context. To illustrate this theme a varieties of capitalism perspective is used to develop a rudimentary global comparative framework. Institutional context is portrayed as a key determinant of the degree and type of family governance that typify national economies. Implications for corporate governance and entrepreneurship in East Asia are discussed.
Lloyd P. SteierEmail:
  相似文献   

19.
This commentary on Klaus Meyer’s article, “Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence,” in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management (2006), discusses the need for Asian management research to look beyond the pressures for publication in top-tier, Western scholarly academic journals. We reflect on our nearly two decades of research on Russian management to illustrate many of Meyer’s ideas and insights in a different transition economy. We support his call for more context-specific research that can also offer contributions to global management knowledge as well as indigenous management practice.
Daniel J. McCarthyEmail:

Sheila M. Puffer   (PhD, University of California, Berkeley) is Professor of International Business at Northeastern University, and a Fellow at the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University. A former editor of The Academy of Management Executive, her research and publications focus primarily on management in Russia’s transition economy. Her more than 150 publications include numerous journal articles, as well as books including The Russian Management Revolution, Business and Management in Russia, The Russian Capitalist Experiment, and Corporate Governance in Russia. She also holds a diploma from the Plekhanov Institute of the National Economy, Moscow. Daniel J. McCarthy   (DBA, Harvard University) is the Alan S. McKim and Richard A. D’Amore Distinguished Professor of Global Management and Innovation at Northeastern University, and is a Fellow at the Davis Center for Russian Studies at Harvard University. His research and publications center on strategic management, entrepreneurship, and corporate governance, particularly in Russia’s transition economy. He has more than 85 publications, including numerous journal articles, and four editions of Business Policy and Strategy, as well as Business and Management in Russia, The Russian Capitalist Experiment, and Corporate Governance in Russia.  相似文献   

20.
Organizational values of people and respect and interdependent structures of team procedures and task interdependence may help departments believe their goals are cooperative and thereby coordinate effectively. CEOs in China completed measures of their organization’s values and interdependent structures and their Vice-Presidents completed measures of the department’s goal interdependence (cooperative, competitive, and independent) and collaborative effectiveness. Structural equation analysis suggested that values and interdependent structures promote cooperative, but not competitive or independent, goals that in turn results in collaborative effectiveness. These results, coupled with previous research, were interpreted as suggesting that people and respect values, team procedures, task interdependence, and cooperative goals are complementary foundations for synergy in China and perhaps other countries as well.
Dean Tjosvold (Corresponding author)Email:
  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号