Systematic and Nonsystematic Mortality Risk in Pension Portfolios

We study the effects of nonsystematic and systematic mortality risks on the required initial capital in a pension plan, in the presence of financial risks. We discover that for a pension plan with few members the impact of pooling on the required capital per person is strong, but nonsystematic risk diminishes rapidly as the number of members increases. Systematic mortality risk, on the other hand, is a significant source of risk in a pension portfolio.     

Hedging Housing Risk*

An unusually rich source of data on housing prices in Stockholm is used to analyze the investment implications of housing choices. This empirical analysis derives market-wide price and return series for housing investment during a 13-year period, and it also provides estimates of the individual-specific, idiosyncratic, variation in housing returns. Because the idiosyncratic component follows an autocorrelated process, the analysis of portfolio choice is dependent upon the holding period. We analyze the composition of household investment portfolios containing housing, common stocks, stocks in real estate holding companies, bonds, and t-bills. For short holding periods, the efficient portfolio contains essentially no housing. For longer periods, low-risk portfolios contain 15 to 50 percent housing. These results suggest that there are large potential gains from policies or institutions that would permit households to hedge their lumpy investments in housing. We estimate the potential value of hedges in reducing risk to households, yet yielding the same investment returns. The value is surprisingly large, especially to poorer homeowners.     

盯市风险下的期货套期保值

本文把盯市风险引入传统的期货套期保值框架，论证了在考虑盯市风险的情况下，一个关注每日最大亏损值的套期保值者会显著地减少他的期货头寸。在一个中期的套期保值期内，该套期保值者的期货套期保值头寸约为其现货头寸的80％。盯市风险的影响随着套期保值期的延长而缓慢减弱。如果套期保值者关注的是每日平均亏损值，在一个中期的套期保值期内盯市风险的影响极小。     

Hedging Housing Risk in London

This paper investigates the benefits of allowing households to compensate the portfolio distortion due to their housing consumption through investments in housing price derivatives. Focusing on the London market, we show that a major loss from over-investment in housing is that households are forced to hold a very risky portfolio. However, the strong performance of the London housing market means that little is lost in terms of expected returns. Even households with limited wealth are better off owning their home rather than renting and investing in financial assets, as long as they are willing to face the financial risk involved. In this context, access to housing price derivatives would benefit most poor homeowners looking to limit their risk exposure. It would also benefit wealthier investors looking for the high returns provided by housing investments without the costs of direct ownership of properties. Comparisons with French, Swedish and U.S. data provide a broader perspective on our findings.     

套期保值与金融衍生品风险管理研究

套期保值是企业经营的重要工具,能够锁定企业的经营成本,规避企业的经营风险。但是,如果套期保值运用不当,则会使企业遭受巨额的损失。本文首先对套期保值的原理及其作用进行基本的介绍,然后,结合我国央企巨亏事件,对套期保值巨亏动因进行深入的分析,以揭示套期保值的潜在风险及其认识误区。最后,对我国企业的套期保值风险控制提出若干建议。     

基于死亡率免疫理论的自然对冲有效性评估

为应对长寿风险对年金产品的影响,本文提出分段对冲策略,并以死亡率免疫和死亡率久期规则为理论基础探讨该策略的有效性问题。为避免传统久期匹配方法中参数估计误差的累积和传导,借助WinBUGS软件和贝叶斯Markov Chain Monte Carlo方法,在统一的计算框架下完成了死亡率预测、死亡率久期计算和对冲效果的数值模拟;并以4种分段组合准备金数据的三维图、方差缩减比(VRR)和VaR值为指标进行长寿风险对冲有效性的对比,结果表明低年龄寿险保单和高年龄年金保单组合具有最平滑的三维图,最小的VRR和VaR值,可明显提高长寿风险自然对冲的有效性。     

Deriving Optimal Portfolios for Hedging Housing Risk

Households that contemplate moving to different cities or trading up/down in the future are exposed to substantial housing risk. In order to mitigate this risk, we derive optimal portfolios using CME housing futures. Housing investment risk is hedged by selling housing futures amounting to the full value of the home. Housing consumption risk is hedged by buying housing futures in each city where the household might move. The size of the hedges depends on the probability of moving, on home values, and on labor income in each region. The hedging demands offset each other when the household intends to live in the same home indefinitely.     

Hedging Longevity Risk When Interest Rates are Uncertain

Abstract

This paper proposes an asset liability management strategy to hedge the aggregate risk of annuity providers under the assumption that both the interest rate and mortality rate are stochastic. We assume that annuity providers can invest in longevity bonds, long-term coupon bonds, and shortterm zero-coupon bonds to immunize themselves from the risks of the annuity for the equity holders subject to a required profit. We demonstrate that the optimal allocation strategy can lead to the lowest risk under different yield curves and mortality rate assumptions. The longevity bond can also be regarded as an effective hedging vehicle that significantly reduces the aggregate risk of the annuity providers.     

最优动态汇率风险套期保值模型研究

构建一个最优动态汇率风险套期保值理论模型,并将其套期保值效率与静态策略进行实证对比.采用对角BEKK模型来捕捉货币现货与期货市场的交互影响,从而刻画风险最小化套期比率的动态特征,结果表明,套期保值能减少汇率风险,但具体的套期保值策略的效率高低排序与避险频率相关.     

A Cautionary Note on Natural Hedging of Longevity Risk

In this article, we examine the so-called natural hedging approach for life insurers to internally manage their longevity risk exposure by adjusting their insurance portfolio. In particular, unlike the existing literature, we also consider a nonparametric mortality forecasting model that avoids the assumption that all mortality rates are driven by the same factor(s).

Our primary finding is that higher order variations in mortality rates may considerably affect the performance of natural hedging. More precisely, although results based on a parametric single factor model—in line with the existing literature—imply that almost all longevity risk can be hedged, results are far less encouraging for the nonparametric mortality model. Our finding is supported by robustness tests based on alternative mortality models.     

风险厌恶、失望厌恶和期货套期保值

本文考察失望厌恶对期货套期保值的影响。我们把一个不变的绝对风险厌恶（CARA）效用函数放进Gul（1991）的失望厌恶框架之内。它显示出，一个更厌恶失望的套期保值者会比一个厌恶失望程度较低的套期保值者选择一个更接近于最小方差套期保值的最优期货头寸。当套期保值者厌恶风险的程度较低时，失望厌恶的效应更强。对失望很小程度的厌恶会使一个接近于风险中性的套期保值者持有一个截然不同的头寸。此外，一个更厌恶风险或失望的套期保值者会有一个较低的参考点reference point。数字上的结果显示，厌恶失望的套期保值者的参考点往往会低于传统的厌恶损失的套期保值者的参考点。于是，厌恶失望的套期保值者的行动会更加保守，利用机会牟利的行为会少于传统的厌恶损失的套期保值者。     

CEO Age,Risk Incentives,and Hedging Strategy

We test whether managerial preferences explain how firms hedge, using hand‐collected data on derivative portfolios in the oil and gas industry. How firms hedge involves choosing between linear contracts and put options, and deciding whether to finance these hedging positions with cash on hand or by selling call options. The likelihood of being a hedger increases with chief executive officer (CEO) age, and near‐retirement CEOs prefer linear hedging instruments. The predictions of the managerial risk incentives theory of hedging strategy, according to which managers with convex compensation schemes avoid hedging strategies that cap upside potential, find no support in the data.     

An International Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Hedging Risk

This paper employs a two-factor international equilibrium asset pricing model to examine the pricing relationships among the world's five largest equity markets. In addition to the traditional market factor premium, a hedging factor premium is included as the second factor to explain the relationship between risks and returns in the international stock markets. Moreover, a GARCH parameterization is adopted to characterize the general dynamics of the conditional second moments. The results suggest that the additional hedging risk premium is needed to explain rates of return on international equities. Furthermore, the restriction that the coefficient on the hedge-portfolio covariance is one smaller than the coefficient on the market-portfolio covariance can not be rejected. This suggests that the intertemporal asset pricing model proposed by Campbell (1993) can be used to explain the returns on the five largest stock market indices.     

Estimating Systematic Risk with Daily Security Returns: A Note on the Relative Efficiency of Selected Estimators

This paper utilizes asymptotic analysis and daily security returns to examine the estimation efficiency of two unbiased robust estimators compared with ordinary least squares. Our results demonstrate a relative efficiency gain for a nonparametric rank estimator and a relative efficiency loss for the minimum absolute deviation estimator when estimating the systematic risk of securities using daily security returns.     

Market Value of Liabilities Mortality Risk

Abstract

Market values of the invested assets are frequently published. For most insurance liabilities, there are no published market values and, therefore, these have to be constructed. This construction can be based on a best estimate and a price for the risks in the liabilities. This paper presents a model explaining how the best estimate and the price of mortality risk can be constructed. Several methods to describe the risks are already known. The purpose of this paper is to describe a method to determine the mortality risk in a practical way.     

Hedging and Coordinated Risk Management: Evidence from Thrift Conversions

We provide an explanation for hedging as a means of allocating rather than reducing risk. We argue that when increases in total risk are costly, firms optimally allocate risk by reducing (increasing) exposure to risks that provide zero (positive) economic rents. Our evidence shows that mutual thrifts that convert to stock institutions increase total risk following conversion, consistent with their increased abilities and incentives for risk taking. They achieve this increase by hedging interest-rate risk and increasing credit risk. We provide some evidence that risk-management activities are related to growth capacity and management compensation structure attained at conversion.