财务绩效与股东、 债权人责任的实证研究

本文以中国企业200强的91家上市公司为样本,通过实证研究检验了对股东责任的履行和对债权人责任的履行对企业财务绩效的影响.结果表明,对股东责任的履行与企业财务绩效之间显著正相关,对债权人责任的履行与企业财务绩效呈显著负相关.企业应协调好与股东、 债权人关系,加强对股东责任的履行,推动企业财务绩效改善.     

民营企业社会责任与财务绩效关系研究

我国民营经济经过20多年的改革与发展,已经成为国民经济发展的重要组成部分。同时,我国民营企业在承担社会责任方面也取得了一定的成绩。文章基于利益相关者理论,对民营上市公司企业社会责任与财务绩效的关系进行实证研究。通过相关性分析和回归分析,得出民营上市公司企业社会责任与财务绩效之间呈显著的正相关关系,且二者之间互为因果关系。     

企业社会责任对财务绩效的影响研究——以造纸业上市公司为例

我国企业社会责任缺失问题已引起广泛关注。企业缺失社会责任,究其缘由,是企业出于经济利益的考虑而不愿承担社会责任。文章以2009—2014年面板数据为研究样本对我国造纸业上市公司的社会责任与企业财务绩效之间的关系进行实证检验。结果表明:企业承担社会责任更有利于提升企业财务绩效。建议从企业层面自律、政府层面推动和社会层面监督三个方面促进企业履行社会责任。     

企业社会责任与财务绩效相关性研究

近年来社会责任问题受到了社会的普遍关注,本文通过对利益相关者理论演进过程的分析,提出了利益相关者模型。在此基础上,选用内部和外部主要利益相关者的财务数据,分等级评分衡量企业社会责任绩效表现,并选用盈利能力和成长能力指标衡量财务绩效进行实证研究,证明了企业社会责任和财务绩效存在正相关关系。     

我国上市公司企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究

本文以2010年至2012年除制造业和金融、保险业之外所有行业的全部上市公司为样本,实证分析了我国上市公司企业社会责任与财务绩效关系。结果发现：企业在员工和投资者层面承担的社会责任贡献对财务绩效的影响存在滞后效应,在国家层面承担的社会责任贡献对财务绩效的影响不存在明显的滞后效应,在公益事业层面承担的社会责任贡献对财务绩效并没有显著的影响;同时,企业的社会责任贡献与财务绩效的关系会因行业差异而有不同表现。     

企业社会责任与财务绩效相关性研究综述

近年来,企业承担社会责任已成为学者、立法者、企业经营者、股东和社会各界关注的焦点,也是企业自身反复思考和论证的问题.其论证的核心之一就是企业社会责任与财务绩效的关系问题,迄今国内外已有数十篇文章对此进行了相关的研究.文章对其进行了总结并对国内研究的进一步发展提出了建议.     

企业社会责任与财务绩效的非线性关系研究

文章以中国沪深A股2008—2017年上市公司为样本,检验了企业履行社会责任对财务绩效的影响,探讨了市场化进程、产权性质在其中的调节作用。研究结果显示:企业履行社会责任与财务绩效间呈倒U型关系,即当企业社会责任的投入资源保持在一定范围内时,财务绩效会随着社会责任投入水平的增加而增加,但超过了该范围,财务绩效会随着社会责任投入水平的增加而下降。进一步研究发现,与市场化进程较低的地区相比,在同一社会责任投入水平下,企业在市场化进程较高的地区能获得更高的财务绩效。与非国有企业相比,履行社会责任与财务绩效之间的倒U型关系在国有企业中更明显。具体而言,当企业的社会责任处于较低投入水平时,国有企业的财务绩效低于非国有企业,但随着社会责任投入的增加,国有企业的财务绩效将逐渐超越非国有企业。     

高污染企业社会责任表现与财务绩效研究

高污染企业生产方式与其他单位生产情况有所不同,其生产过程带来的污染很可能导致其社会责任表现与实际发展状况不协调.企业为了追求更高的经济效益及利润,就会出现浪费社会资源的情况,甚至会破坏社会环境,这使企业经济的发展与社会责任表现逐渐背离.因此,企业作为社会的基本经营组织,应当将自身与社会发展的大环境进行融合,保证其能够在...     

企业社会责任与财务绩效相关性研究综述

随着经济的快速发展,社会各界越来越重视企业社会责任的履行情况,而理清企业履行社会责任的状况与其财务绩效的关系,更是理论和实务界所关注的焦点。本文旨在总结国内外相关研究,为今后相关研究提供借鉴和参考。     

Corporate social responsibility and economic performance

We describe some perspectives on corporate social responsibility (CSR), in order to provide a context for considering the strategic motivations and implications of CSR. Based on this framework, which is based on characterizing optimal firm decision-making and underlies most existing work on CSR, we propose an agenda for further theoretical and empirical research on CSR. We then summarize and relate the articles in this special issue to the proposed agenda.     

企业社会责任与财务绩效的关联性研究综述

企业社会责任与财务绩效的关联性是国内外研究的一个热点问题。论文运用文献研究法对国内外企业社会责任与财务绩效相关研究进行了详细梳理,对二者相关性的研究结论进行了分类总结;同时分析了企业社会责任与财务绩效关联性研究结论不一致的原因,并为后续研究提出了建议。     

Board internationalization and corporate social responsibility

This study examines the association between board internationalization and firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in China during 2009–2019. Using a large dataset of director nationalities and CSR scores, we find that foreign directors promote CSR performance as evidenced by higher CSR scores. We further document that this relationship is more pronounced among government-controlled firms, firms with better corporate governance, and firms operating under stricter institutional environments. These findings remain valid after sequential robustness checks. Overall, our findings imply that foreign directors motivate the board of directors and their firms to actively pursue and practice social responsibility. Our study enriches the literature on the outcomes of board internationalization and determinants of CSR and provides the internationalization of corporate governance mechanisms a reasonable basis.     

日本企业社会责任及其给我国的启示

日本的企业社会责任外延广泛而内涵缺乏,并且深受日本文化的影响,其推动力主要来自于政府、企业、媒体和非政府组织、民众四个方面。日本企业社会责任落后于欧美,但在亚洲仍然处于领先地位,值得我国学习借鉴。建立适合国情的企业社会责任体系,推动企业、政府、媒体、非政府组织和民众在发展CSR上的通力协作,以建立标准化体系为方向是我国CSR发展的可行之策。     

An expanded investigation into the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance

While many studies have examined the relationship of the two constructs of financial performance and CSR, little consensus has emerged. This study investigates the relationship through a set of comprehensive and long-term financial measures, which include both accounting and market returns. Also, an established CSR database generated through a validated CSR research instrument is used in a new, more thorough manner. While the regression analyses reveal no relationship to exist between the constructs, a number of methodological factors are proposed to play a role in contributing to such findings.     

Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: event study cases

This paper examines how the U.S. capital market perceives corporate social responsibilities (CSRs) by examining the constituent companies of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and explores whether the implementation of CSR policies and verification by independent organizations contribute to variances in financial performance . This paper also examines different events (i.e., nominations, inclusions, and awards) in the analysis of how much importance investors place on CSR. The results show that investors do not exhibit significant recognition of U.S. companies included in the DJSI. However, when CSR becomes common practice within a given industry, certification by independent third parties regarding CSR policies conveys actual benefits to corporate performance. In addition, this paper compares degrees of CSR recognition between investors in the United States and investors in Taiwan. This study uses the Awards of Excellence in Corporate Social Responsibility given by Common Wealth Magazine to assess whether investors form different expectations of CSR based on company size. The results indicate that Taiwanese investors are increasingly aware of CSRs and the awards received by mid-sized companies show significant impacts. Changes in share prices for mid-sized companies are slower than for large companies. This paper argues that CSR policies not only enhance reputation but also lead to good financial performance. Companies are encouraged to take an active attitude toward CSR by understanding the relevant costs.     

The effect of performance measurement systems on firm performance: A cross-sectional and a longitudinal study

Performance measurement (PM) systems have been popularized over the last 20 years and the operations management literature is replete with discussion of metrics and measurement systems. Yet, a comprehensive nomological network relating types of PM system uses to organizational capabilities and performance is lacking. Furthermore, there is scant empirical evidence attesting to the explanatory efficacy of PM systems as it relates to organizational performance. We view PM system uses through the lenses of the Resource Orchestration Theory (ROT) and explore specific relationships of underlying variables by relying on the Organizational Information Processing Theory (OIPT). Resting on the extant literature, we identify two types of uses which include Diagnostic Use (the review of critical performance variables in order to maintain, alter, or justify patterns in an organizational activity) and interactive use (a forward-looking activity exemplified by active and frequent involvement of top management envisioning new ways to orchestrate organizational resources for competitive advantage) and relate them along with their interaction (i.e., dynamic tension) to organizational capabilities. We further link capabilities to target performance, which subsequently impacts organizational performance (operationalized through both perceptual and objective financial performance measures). The nomological network is tested via a cross sectional study (386 Italian firms) while the efficacy of PM systems to explain organizational performance is examined by using longitudinal panel data approaches over a 10 year period. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the use of PM systems leads to improved capabilities, which then impact performance. Contrary to the extant literature, however, we discovered that Diagnostic Use appears to be the most constructive explanatory variable for capabilities. On the other hand, in light of a longitudinal study, we also uncovered that Diagnostic Use experienced depreciating returns as far as objective financial measures are concerned. Also, when high levels of Diagnostic Use were coupled with low levels of Interactive Use, they produced the lowest levels of organizational capabilities. Conversely, high levels of both types of PM system use generated extraordinary high levels of capabilities. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that organizations cannot rely merely on Diagnostic Use of PM systems. We also learned that the effects of PM systems (measured via adaptation) fade unless high learning rates are applied. We offer detailed recommendations for future research which have theoretical as well as empirical implications.     

外商投资企业在华社会责任比较研究

本文综合运用统计分析与问卷调查方法,从员工利益、纳税责任、环境责任、客户与供应商关系、社会公益责任等方面比较外商投资企业、国有企业和其他(民营、乡镇、改制)企业在华履行社会责任的状况。结论认为,外商投资企业在华社会责任总体表现优于国有企业和其他企业。     

The effects of financial openness and financial efficiency on Chinese macroeconomic volatilities

This paper builds an open-economy DSGE model to study the effects of financial openness and financial efficiency on the macroeconomic volatilities and estimate the model with the Bayesian method and Chinese quarterly data from 2001Q1 to 2017Q4. We further test the validity of model predictions with panel analyses of Chinese provincial data from 1987 to 2016 and various robustness tests. The results show that: first, further financial openness will lead to an increase in output volatility but U-shaped changes in consumption and investment volatilities. Second, financial efficiency improvement helps to reduce the macroeconomic volatilities but has a diminishing marginal benefit. Third, our estimates of China's degree of financial openness and financial efficiency are both at the medium level close to the thresholds. It implies that further financial openness will dramatically increase the macroeconomic volatilities but whether financial efficiency improvement can mitigate instability is uncertain.     

基于价值链的电网企业关键绩效指标评价

企业关键绩效指标(KPI)评价体系是在企业战略目标分解基础上形成的,用于动态掌握企业战略达成情况,是企业管理决策控制系统的重要组成部分。本文对电网经营企业建立关键绩效评价体系的必要性及其设计原则进行了阐述,并在对电网企业价值链分析的基础上,提炼了包括财务指标和非财务指标在内的电网企业关键绩效指标(KPI),以引导和控制企业战略的实施。