共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prof. Dr. B. M. S. Van Praag 《De Economist》1975,123(2):147-163
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Door A. Heertje econ. drs. 《De Economist》1956,104(1):743-756
De schrijver dankt Prof. P. de Wolff en Prof. P. Hennipman voor de vele nuttige opmerkingen, die zij bij het tot stand komen van dit artikel hebben gemaakt. 相似文献
16.
17.
J. B. D. Derksen 《De Economist》1974,122(5):451-454
Summary The author presents some comments on the discussion between Mrs. Bruyn-Hundt and Prof. Tinbergen inDe Economist, 1973, nr. 6. In analysing the welfare of housewives, the nature of the family and of the raising of children, which is one of the ultimate aimes of human life, should be taken into account. Before deciding if, and to what extent, the unpaid services of housewives and other members of the family should be included in the national income, a production boundary within households should be defined. It is doubtful whether the inclusion of unpaid domestic services in the definition of national income is very useful for purposes of economic analysis. 相似文献
18.
19.
P. E. Venekamp 《De Economist》1958,106(1):616-637
Voordracht, gehouden op de Statistische Dag van de Vereniging voor Statistiek, 1 april 1958 te Amsterdam. 相似文献
20.