Private equity bids in Australia: an exploratory study

In this study, we provide an insight into how private equity players choose their targets and the bid arrangements they prefer. We test our expectations of the unique features of private equity targets using a sample of 23 listed private equity target firms during 2001–2007. We find, relative to a benchmark sample of 81 corporate targets matched by year and industry, the private equity target firms to be larger, more profitable, use their assets more efficiently, more highly levered and have greater cash flow. Multivariate testing indicates that private equity targets have relatively greater financial slack, greater financial stability, greater free cash flow and lower measurable growth prospects. All conclusions are found to be robust to a control sample of 502 takeover bids during 2001–2007.     

Managerial power, compensation gap and firm performance — Evidence from Chinese public listed companies

We study the relationship between compensation gap and firm performance in the Chinese market. Extant studies have shown that, for the publicly traded companies in China, compensation gap between senior executives plays a tournament role and motivates managers to achieve higher level of performance. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression results confirm the above result. However, simultaneous regression results indicate that the tournament effect is more significant in firms with high managerial powers. Our finding suggests that previous findings using OLS might be incomplete. We also show that firms with better performance and greater managerial power tend to have greater compensation gap. Meanwhile, the relationship between managerial power and firm performance is, on average, negative.     

Non‐profit vulnerability: An exploratory study

This mixed‐method study explores the symptoms and potential causes of non‐profit vulnerability within the Australian context. Following two focus groups with CEOs and Chairs of non‐profit organizations, an online survey was developed, pilot tested and distributed to non‐profit CEOs. Our findings suggest three symptoms that might be particularly useful in identifying non‐profit vulnerability: a substantial increase in unit costs/delivery hours; a substantial increase in the proportion of administration to program expenses; and a reduced ability to pursue the organization's mission. The results also suggest various potential causes of non‐profit vulnerability; in particular, Board inadequacies; External environmental threats; Project management issues; and Funding constraints.     

CLARIFYING FUNDS STATEMENTS — THE TWO ENTITY TEST

A major shortcoming of the funds statement prepared under a resources concept is that the meaning of the term “resources” is unclear. A transaction test is usually adopted to identify entries involving funds, but it is apparent from published reports and from the Australian profession's recent exposure draft that substantial confusion remains. One response has been to reject the broader concepts in favour of narrower definitions such as cash or working capital. In this article, however, it is argued that an all resources funds statement, properly defined, has an important contribution to make. A “two entity” test is proposed which is claimed to be tighter and closer to the spirit of the original resources concept than the present transaction test.     

ESTIMATING RETURNS ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS — STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS

The present paper addresses the problem of estimating returns on financial instruments when there is incomplete information about the instrument's cash flows. However unlike previous work in this area, it is assumed that the financial instrument's cash flows may be modelled as a stochastic function of time. This implies that the estimation error is a random variable and as a consequence, probability assessments can be made as to its likely magnitude. Using these procedures it is shown that traditional estimating methods considerably overstate actual returns. Further, it is also shown that returns are far from normally distributed. Given these results, it is doubtful whether any credibility can be attached to the standard two parameter methods of evaluating investment performance.     

ESTIMATING RETURNS ON FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS — DETERMINISTIC ANALYSIS

The present paper addresses the problem of estimating returns on financial instruments when there is incomplete information about the instrument's cash flows. The problem is shown to resolve itself as an exercise in numerical analysis. In theory, the true return is obtained as the solution of an integral equation, but since the required functions are incompletely specified, numerical estimating techniques must be applied. Alternative numerical methods are examined, each of which make different assumptions about the time series properties of the financial instrument's cash flows. It is shown that the estimated returns are highly sensitive to these assumptions and thus to the numerical technique used.     

Pricing and Indirect Cost Allocation — A Note

Companies that use cost-based pricing usually allocate indirect costs to their products. An inherent problem with this is that, while product prices are a function of the total cost, indirect cost allocation methods based on revenues depend on the product prices. This paper shows how to simultaneously determine unique product prices (with unequal markup rates) and cost allocations using the relative revenue method.     

Floccinaucinihilipilification In Accounting — Does It Matter?

Everyone admires consistency in the beliefs and actions of others. It is a token of reliability, long upheld as an ideal by accountants. At the same time, many tolerate and excuse inconsistency — especially on their own part — generally in the face of "unusual" circumstances. That liberty is abused, however, if the occasional becomes habitual, endorsed as a matter of principle or enshrined in the dicta of the influential. Then, the confused and contradictory override the deliverance of common sense and reason. The upshot is chaos in thought and practice and gross interference with the orderly conduct of financial affairs.     

The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study

Recent attention in the general management literature has focused on mechanisms and processes used by organizations to respond and adapt to changes in their operating environment. There is, however, very little broad-based empirical research examining the role that management accounting control systems can play in shaping organizational change. Much of the empirical research to date has focused on the role of accounting as a diagnostic tool for assessing and rewarding managerial performance despite the recognition that accounting can serve as a dialogue, learning and idea creation machine (Burchell et al., 1980. Accounting Organisations and Society 5,5–27). The purpose of this study is to explore how accounting can serve this alternative role. We use (Simons, R. 1990.) Accounting Organisations and Society 15, 127–143). interactive/diagnostic classification of management control systems to capture how accounting can be used as a learning machine in the formulation and implementation of strategic change. A theoretical model is developed to examine the relationship between strategic change, style of budget use and performance. It is argued that an interactive style of budget use can mitigate the disruptive performance effects of the strategic change process. The data, collected from Chief Executive Officers in 63 public hospitals, provide results that are consistent with our expectations.