国有企业薪酬管制与在职消费

本文对国有企业薪酬管制与在职消费现状以及影响因素和对社会的影响的进行了分析,分析薪酬管制的基本概念和对相关政策的解读,在职消费的基本概念和对相关政策的解读,具体分析了我国国有企业薪酬管制和在职消费的发展和存在的问题,并提出相应对策,最后对我国企业高层管理者的在职消费控制提出希望。     

消费管制:实现生态消费的重要保证

本文运用萨勒的行为生命周期理论分析了消费者如何根据外部因素的影响来调整头脑账户的结构最终决定消费行为,即消费者的自控机制是如何实现均衡的,指出仅靠消费者的自律实现生态消费是困难的,认为应由政府对消费实行管制,只有政府对消费施行管制才能有效地实行生态消费,实现消费和谐.     

论消费管制的含义、分类及其必要性

消费管制是政府对消费者的消费活动进行的限制,按照不同的分类标准,可将消费管制划分为不同的类型。消费管制是政府经济管制的重要组成部分,研究消费管制具有重要的意义。在市场经济中,消费者的消费活动并不能够是完全自由的经济活动,消费活动带来的负的外部性、消费信息的不对称、消费者的非理性行为的存在、未成年人和社会弱者权益的维护、消费秩序、公共安全的维护和环境保护、促进民族产业和民族经济的发展等都提供了政府实施消费管制的必要性,此外基于实际的经济因素和政治原因,政府也会实施消费管制。     

构建和谐社会必须加强对消费的调控与引导

加强对消费的调控和引导,对构建社会主义和谐社会具有重大意义。当前消费领域存在消费率偏低、收入差距扩大、农村消费增长缓慢、消费方式粗放和消费环境不理想等问题,影响社会经济的和谐发展。因此,必须大力加强对消费的调控和引导,坚持以科学发展观为指导,努力转变经济增长方式,协调好生产与消费的关系,缩小收入差距,提高农村消费水平,完善社会保障体系,倡导可持续消费方式,营造和谐消费环境。     

大学生消费现状调查分析与思考

大学生作为社会特殊的消费群体,他们的消费观念的塑造和培养更为突出而直接地影响其世界观的形成与发展,进而对其一生的品德行为产生重要的影响。关注大学生消费现状,分析大学生消费中存在的问题及产生问题的原因,培养和提高他们的"财商",引导他们形成正确的价值观念体系,在当前成为高校思想政治教育的重要课题。     

流通与消费的七大关系

<正>流通业通过提供质优价廉的商品,提高自身服务水平,加强品牌宣传,影响着国内居民的消费心理和消费观念流通能够引导消费心理流通能够保障消费安全流通能够提供消费便利     

利率变动对我国居民消费的影响——基于DSGE模型的研究

在当前经济形势下,扩内需,保增长的首要任务就是提高消费。鉴于管制利率和市场利率共存的事实,文章建立DSGE模型,首次从管制利率与市场利率两方面,分别研究利率变动对居民消费的影响。脉冲响应结果表明,利率下降会通过两种传导渠道提高居民消费;反事实仿真结果表明,存贷款利率冲击对消费影响更显著,但拆借利率冲击影响更持久。     

西安城镇文化消费现状与拉动策略

文化消费是民众消费的重要内容,发展文化消费是提高民众素质、促进社会进步和发展的重要手段.本文对西安城镇居民文化消费的总体状况进行了阐述,并对影响文化消费的因素进行分析,最后提出了拉动文化消费的措施.     

通货膨胀与消费需求——基于省级面板数据的实证研究

认识通货膨胀对消费的影响对于理解中国扩大内需的政策有重要意义。本文通过建立一个分省面板数据的回归模型,系统考察了通货膨胀对消费的影响。结果发现,通货膨胀与最终消费率负相关,通货膨胀抑制了最终消费在GDP中的占比;从通胀对消费结构的影响看,通货膨胀降低了农村消费和耐用品消费在最终消费中的占比;通货膨胀并没有显著提高总体名义消费水平的增长,但高通胀有利于城市名义消费水平的增长。从刺激消费的角度而言,控通胀的政策有利于稳定消费,从而稳定经济增长。     

价值观念与消费制度

消费选择受人的偏好和收入水平的影响,人的偏好又与他的价值观念有关,消费选择行为因而要受人的价值观念的影响。同时,偏好是通过一定的制度安排影响消费选择行为的,消费者均衡理论与价格制度就对消费选择有较大的影响。价值观念、消费制度与人的消费行为有关系,要树立社会主义市场经济的消费观念和消费制度,就应该转变传统的价值观念。     

中国奢侈品消费的动因分析

随着当前我国奢侈品消费人数的不断攀升及奢侈品消费金额的不断提高,中国的奢侈品消费从整体上看未富先奢的局面已经出现。其大致可分为两类：一类是传统奢侈品的消费,消费人群主要集中在超富裕阶层;另一类是新奢侈品的消费,消费人群是中产阶级和白领。从影响我国消费者奢侈品消费的主要动机来看,人际性消费是影响我国奢侈品消费的主要动机,其中符号性消费是影响我国当前奢侈品消费的首要因素。符号性消费、从众性消费与人情消费都属于非理性的消费行为,促使我国奢侈品消费呈现出一种非理性状态。因此．应大力倡导理性消费．同时也要抓住契机。加大宣传营销力度与创新．树立自己的民族奢侈品牌,更好地发施我国经济     

新疆电力消费量发展现状与影响因素分析

总结电力消费量发展相关理论,分析新疆规模以上工业企业电力消费量及万元GDP电力消费量。对工业企业电力消费量和电力消费总量的影响因素进行实证分析,得出新疆与全国电力消费量的总体趋势一致,相差不大,新疆各地对电力消费量需求量地域差异明显,规模以上工业企业原煤消费量、工业总产值等对规模以上工业企业的电力消费量影响显著,居民消费水平、总人口数及GDP对电力消费总量影响显著。建议电力能源发展应注重提高能源效率,优化经济结构,引进高新技术,提高能源利用率,加强节能意识。     

中国城乡居民消费持续低迷的心理因素分析

消费心理是消费需求的具体表现 ,又是消费行为的内在因素 ,同时居民消费行为将对经济运行产生一定的影响。城乡居民消费持续低迷固然是由多方面的原因造成的 ,其中心理因素发挥着重要的不容忽视的作用。了解、分析消费者心理 ,对正确地引导居民消费是十分必要的。     

Keeping Up With the Joneses: Analyzing the Effect of Income Inequality on Consumer Borrowing

Household debt relative to disposable income increased from 60% in 1980 to 104% at the end of 2003. ‘Buying on credit’ has become so popular that an increasing number of firms generate more profit from financing than from selling their products. In this paper, we show that rising income inequality has substantially contributed to increased consumer borrowing. Income inequality affects all components of total household debt, but the impact is strongest on non-revolving debt (installment loans), which is used to finance the purchase of consumer durables. We argue and provide evidence that the income inequality effect on consumer borrowing is a result of conspicuous consumption. Rising income inequality has forced households with smaller income gains to use debt to keep up their consumption level relative to households with larger income gains.JEL Classification: D12, G29, J31, M30     

交通基础设施改善能促进居民消费吗——来自高铁开通的证据

交通基础设施改善是促进商品流通、扩展消费空间、提振消费内需的重要推动力。将高铁开通作为“准自然实验”，基于我国2004～2018年地级市层面数据，通过双重差分法从消费支出、消费结构与消费率三个角度实证分析了交通基础设施改善对居民消费的促进效应。研究发现：第一，高铁开通有利于沿线城市消费支出增长、消费结构升级与消费率提升，且这一作用随着高铁站与市中心距离的延长而衰减；第二，高铁对居民消费的影响表现出显著的城市等级与区位异质性；第三，高铁可以通过时空压缩与市场一体化效应促进消费支出增长、消费结构升级与消费率提升。     

Shedding light on sharing ECONOMY and new materialist consumption: An empirical approach

In the last decade, the sharing economy has emerged as a business model that improves the use of goods, uses fewer resources than traditional markets, increases social interactions and promotes more responsible and environmentally friendly consumption. This has led various authors to propose that the sharing economy could be a business model that will change consumers’ relationship to objects and the materialistic lifestyle. This exploratory research is, to the best of our knowledge, the first to specifically identify a new consumer materialism with the sharing economy. To this end, a survey was conducted among 384 participants in the sharing economy, identifying not only the drivers of the new materialism but also their impact on consumption.Our conclusions show that we are currently experiencing a new materialism in which the main elements of traditional materialism—property and the accumulation of goods and the happiness derived from the accumulation of goods and their exhibition as a status symbol—are losing importance. Thus, materialism is evolving from a mere static accumulation of goods towards a hybrid model in which property and the enjoyment of goods coexist with the enjoyment of experiences, which are becoming increasingly more important. Last, participation in the sharing economy drives this new materialism through its contribution to a greater awareness of consumption. In other words, the consumer has a greater consumption awareness.This paper proposes theoretical foundations to conceptualize the new materialism and a new materialist consumer profile that represents a break from the traditional conception, provides evidence on the dynamics of the feedback and empowerment of the sharing economy, and finally contributes by shedding light on its impact because the dynamics and impact of the sharing economy are more complex than they initially seem and thus it is necessary to analyse different angles and concepts.     

The effects of consumer empowerment on risk perception and satisfaction with food consumption

This study intends to measure consumer empowerment related to food consumption and determine its effect on food risk perception and satisfaction with food consumption. Data were derived from an analysis of the “2017 Research on Food Consumption Behaviour” by the Korea Rural Economic Institute. Consumer empowerment, risk perception and satisfaction with food consumption were measured using a 5‐point Likert scale. The differences in consumer empowerment according to gender, age, educational level and monthly income were statistically significant. The factors that affected risk perception were information use, healthy eating, consumer rights, consumer responsibility and monthly income. The higher the scores for information use, healthy eating and consumer responsibility, the higher the score for satisfaction with food consumption.     

The impact of anti‐consumption on consumer well‐being

Although consumption is a symbol of an individual's socio‐economic status, an increasing number of individuals voluntarily prefer to consume less. This phenomenon is called anti‐consumption and it mainly occurs in developed countries where consumption levels have reached excessive amounts. One of the main aims of individuals following an anti‐consumption lifestyle is to increase their own well‐being. However, researchers have yet to investigate whether anti‐consumption, indeed, leads to greater positive consumer well‐being. Hence, through this paper this gap in research is addressed by first deriving a conceptual framework and hypotheses, followed by developing an anti‐consumption scale, and then by testing the impact of anti‐consumption on consumer well‐being. The insights of our analysis highlight the implications for both academia and consumers.     

中国城镇居民消费效益综合评价

从居民消费效益的内涵出发,构建中国城镇居民消费效益的评价指标体系,其由居民消费身心效益评价指标体系、居民消费经济效益评价指标体系、居民消费生态效益评价指标体系三部分构成;选取主成分法、熵值法和模糊综合评价法,对中国大陆31个省市城镇居民消费效益进行综合评价排名;根据三种评价结果采用组合评价法,按组合评价值的大小得到排序结果,并进行事前检验和事后检验,根据检验结果选出最优的组合评价结果。结论是,中国城镇居民消费效益与经济发展水平存在一种"U"型分布关系。     

The impact of the implicit theories of social optimism and social pessimism on macro attitudes towards consumption

People have substantially differing attitudes towards consumption. Anti-consumers are negative towards consumption. In contrast, pro-consumers view consumption in a positive light. We posit that people's attitudes toward consumption at the societal (macro) level are impacted by the implicit theories they hold about whether society can solve the problems it faces. We identify two different implicit theories consumers hold regarding how solvable larger societal problems are. Social optimists believe that we will solve the problems that are emerging as we evolve at the societal level. In contrast, social pessimists believe that societal evolution is creating problems too large to be solved. We developed a macro attitudes model where social optimism and pessimism were posited to impact people's macro attitudes towards consumption. We present the results of a study that found that social optimists have more positive attitudes towards consumption and social pessimists have more negative attitudes towards consumption. We also found that this model provided a superior fit in comparison to three other plausible models relating implicit theories and attitudes towards consumption. These findings have implications for anti-consumption research, consumer research on implicit theories, and social marketing designed to address problems associated with overconsumption.