Testing for structural change in regression quantiles

Most studies in the structural change literature focus solely on the conditional mean, while under various circumstances, structural change in the conditional distribution or in conditional quantiles is of key importance. This paper proposes several tests for structural change in regression quantiles. Two types of statistics are considered, namely, a fluctuation type statistic based on the subgradient and a Wald type statistic, based on comparing parameter estimates obtained from different subsamples. The former requires estimating the model under the null hypothesis, and the latter involves estimation under the alternative hypothesis. The tests proposed can be used to test for structural change occurring in a pre-specified quantile, or across quantiles, which can be viewed as testing for change in the conditional distribution with a linear specification of the conditional quantile function. Both single and multiple structural changes are considered. We derive the limiting distributions under the null hypothesis, and show they are nuisance parameter free and can be easily simulated. A simulation study is conducted to assess the size and power in finite samples.     

Measure for Measure: Exact F Tests and the Mixed Models Controversy

We consider exact F tests for the hypothesis of null random factor effect in the presence of interaction under the two factor mixed models involved in the mixed models controversy. We show that under the constrained parameter ( CP ) model, even in unbalanced data situations, MSB/MSE (in the usual ANOVA notation) follows an exact F distribution when the null hypothesis holds. We also obtain an exact F test for what is generally (and erroneously) assumed to be an equivalent hypothesis under the unconstrained parameter ( UP ) model. For unbalanced data, such a corresponding test statistic does not coincide with MSB/MSAB (the test statistic advocated for balanced data cases). We compute the power of the exact test under different imbalance patterns and show that although the loss of power increases with the degree of imbalance, it still remains reasonable from a practical point of view.     

A consistent nonparametric test of parametric regression functional form in fixed effects panel data models

We propose a consistent test for a linear functional form against a nonparametric alternative in a fixed effects panel data model. We show that the test has a limiting standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis, and show that the test is a consistent test. We also establish the asymptotic validity of a bootstrap procedure which is used to better approximate the finite sample null distribution of the test statistic. Simulation results show that the proposed test performs well for panel data with a large number of cross-sectional units and a finite number of observations across time.     

A robust version of the KPSS test based on indicators

This paper proposes a test of the null hypothesis of stationarity that is robust to the presence of fat-tailed errors. The test statistic is a modified version of the so-called KPSS statistic. The modified statistic uses the “sign” of the data minus the sample median, whereas KPSS used deviations from means. This “indicator” KPSS statistic has the same limit distribution as the standard KPSS statistic under the null, without relying on assumptions about moments, but a different limit distribution under unit root alternatives. The indicator test has lower power than standard KPSS when tails are thin, but higher power when tails are fat.     

An outlier test for linear processes

In this paper we introduce an outlier test for linear processes. It is assumed that an upper bound for the number of outliers is known which is not too big in relation to the sample size. The test statistic bases on the comparison of the observations with certain predictors. We discuss the asymptotical behaviour of the test statistic under the null hypothesis ‘no outlier’ and derive the asymptotic distribution for the case that the distribution of the squared white noise process belongs to a certain subset of the domain of attraction of the Gumbel distribution. Especially the most important case in applications, the Gaussian white noise is included.     

Score tests for zero covariances in recursive linear models for grouped or censored data

The score test statistic for testing whether an error covariance is zero is derived for a normal linear recursive model for fully observed, censored or grouped data. The test, which is obtained by regarding non-zero error covariances as arising from correlated random parameter variation, is shown to be closely related to the Information Matrix test. It turns out that the statistic, which is asymptotically N[0,1] under the null, examines the sample covariance of appropriately defined residuals.     

A test for the weights of the global minimum variance portfolio in an elliptical model

In this paper we consider the weights of the global minimum variance portfolio (GMVP). The returns are assumed to follow a matrix elliptically contoured distribution, i.e., the returns are assumed to be neither independent nor normally distributed. A test for the general linear hypothesis is given. The distribution of the test statistic is derived under the null and the alternative hypothesis. It turns out that its distribution is invariant with respect to the type of the matrix elliptical distribution, i.e., the stochastic properties of the GMVP do not depend either on the mean vector or on the distributional assumptions imposed on asset returns. In an empirical study we analyze an international diversified portfolio.     

Tests based on φ-divergences for bivariate symmetry

In this paper we introduce a family of test statistics for testing symmetry based on φ-divergence families. These test statistics yield the likelihood ratio test and the Pearson test statistic as special cases. Asymptotic distribution for the new test statistics are derived under both the null and the alternative hypotheses. A simulation study is presented to see that some new test statistics offer an attractive alternative to the classical Pearson test statistic for the problem of symmetry. Received: May 2000     

On the Power of GLS-Type Unit Root Tests

Elliott, Rothenberg and Stock (1996), (ERS), present a 'GLS' variant of the Dickey-Fuller (DF) unit root test. Their statistic is approximately point-optimal invariant at a chosen local alternative, and usually displays better finite sample power than the DF test. Following the usual efficiency motive for GLS estimation, the higher finite sample power of the ERS test has often been attributed to the greater accuracy of the estimate of the series' non-stochastic component under stationary alternatives close to the null. This paper shows that the GLS estimates of the non-stochastic component are not, in general, more accurate. The power gain arises from the fact that the GLS statistic's null distribution has a greater positive shift relative to the DF test, than its distribution under relevant alternatives, and this persists even when the GLS estimates of the non stochastics have higher variance than the OLS estimates.     

Statistical inference on restricted partial linear regression models with partial distortion measurement errors

We consider the estimation and hypothesis testing problems for the partial linear regression models when some variables are distorted with errors by some unknown functions of commonly observable confounding variable. The proposed estimation procedure is designed to accommodate undistorted as well as distorted variables. To test a hypothesis on the parametric components, a restricted least squares estimator is proposed under the null hypothesis. Asymptotic properties for the estimators are established. A test statistic based on the difference between the residual sums of squares under the null and alternative hypotheses is proposed, and we also obtain the asymptotic properties of the test statistic. A wild bootstrap procedure is proposed to calculate critical values. Simulation studies are conducted to demonstrate the performance of the proposed procedure, and a real example is analyzed for an illustration.     

Testing for unobserved heterogeneity in exponential and Weibull duration models

We examine the use of the likelihood ratio (LR) statistic to test for unobserved heterogeneity in duration models, based on mixtures of exponential or Weibull distributions. We consider both the uncensored and censored duration cases. The asymptotic null distribution of the LR test statistic is not the standard chi-square, as the standard regularity conditions do not hold. Instead, there is a nuisance parameter identified only under the alternative, and a null parameter value on the boundary of the parameter space, as in Cho and White (2007a). We accommodate these and provide methods delivering consistent asymptotic critical values. We conduct a number of Monte Carlo simulations, comparing the level and power of the LR test statistic to an information matrix (IM) test due to Chesher (1984) and Lagrange multiplier (LM) tests of Kiefer (1985) and Sharma (1987). Our simulations show that the LR test statistic generally outperforms the IM and LM tests. We also revisit the work of van den Berg and Ridder (1998) on unemployment durations and of Ghysels et al. (2004) on interarrival times between stock trades, and, as it turns out, affirm their original informal inferences.     

A score test under logistic regression models based on case–control data

We propose a score statistic to test the vector of odds ratio parameters under the logistic regression model based on case–control data. The proposed score test is based on the semiparametric profile loglikelihood function under a two-sample semiparametric model, which is equivalent to the assumed logistic regression model. The proposed score statistic has an asymptotic chi-squared distribution under the null hypothesis and an asymptotic noncentral chi-squared distribution under local alternatives to the null hypothesis. Moreover, we show that the proposed score test is asymptotically equivalent to the Wald test under the logistic regression model based on case–control data. In addition, we demonstrate that the proposed score statistic and its asymptotic distribution may be obtained by fitting the prospective logistic regression model to case–control data. We present some results on simulation and on the analysis of two real datasets.     

A consistent model specification test with mixed discrete and continuous data

In this paper we propose a nonparametric kernel-based model specification test that can be used when the regression model contains both discrete and continuous regressors. We employ discrete variable kernel functions and we smooth both the discrete and continuous regressors using least squares cross-validation (CV) methods. The test statistic is shown to have an asymptotic normal null distribution. We also prove the validity of using the wild bootstrap method to approximate the null distribution of the test statistic, the bootstrap being our preferred method for obtaining the null distribution in practice. Simulations show that the proposed test has significant power advantages over conventional kernel tests which rely upon frequency-based nonparametric estimators that require sample splitting to handle the presence of discrete regressors.     

Modified lagrange multiplier tests for problems with one-sided alternatives

A modified Lagrange multiplier test statistic is proposed which takes explicit account of the one-sided nature of the alternative in problems where the null hypothesis specifies that the true value of the parameter vector lies on the boundary of the parameter space. Computation of this statistic requires only the constrained maximum likelihood estimator. Conditions for the consistency of tests based on this statistic are examined and it is shown that the distribution of the statistic is not affected of nuisance parameters are allowed to lie on the boundary of the parameter space.     

Distribution-free test procedures in two-way layouts; a concept of rank-interaction

Summary  In this paper the concept of 'rank-interaction' is introduced and a distribution-free method for testing against the presence of 'rank-interaction' is suggested in the case of a two-way layout (classification) with m (> 1) observations per cell. Roughly speaking rank-interaction can be understood as the phenomenon at which the ranks of the levels of some relevant variable are different for different classes of the other factor. The exact null distribution of the test statistic has been computed in some cases. The asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis has been derived. A test suggested by J.V. B radley in his book 'Distribution-free Statistical Tests' [2] is discussed. In the opinion of the authors it is doubtful whether the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic under the null hypothesis, as given by B radley , is correct. The test of B radley was intended to be sensitive to the presence of interactions defined in the usual way and hence not only to 'rank-interaction'. The same applies to methods proposed by some other authors. We claim that situations exist where one should test against rank-interaction and not against the usual more general alternative.     

Testing for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity in generalized linear models for panel data

Recent literature on panel data emphasizes the importance of accounting for time-varying unobservable individual effects, which may stem from either omitted individual characteristics or macro-level shocks that affect each individual unit differently. In this paper, we propose a simple specification test of the null hypothesis that the individual effects are time-invariant against the alternative that they are time-varying. Our test is an application of Hausman (1978) testing procedure and can be used for any generalized linear model for panel data that admits a sufficient statistic for the individual effect. This is a wide class of models which includes the Gaussian linear model and a variety of nonlinear models typically employed for discrete or categorical outcomes. The basic idea of the test is to compare two alternative estimators of the model parameters based on two different formulations of the conditional maximum likelihood method. Our approach does not require assumptions on the distribution of unobserved heterogeneity, nor it requires the latter to be independent of the regressors in the model. We investigate the finite sample properties of the test through a set of Monte Carlo experiments. Our results show that the test performs well, with small size distortions and good power properties. We use a health economics example based on data from the Health and Retirement Study to illustrate the proposed test.     

Goodness-of-fit tests in linear EV regression with replications

This paper proposes a goodness-of-fit test for checking the adequacy of parametric forms of the regression error density functions in linear errors-in-variables regression models. Instead of assuming the distribution of the measurement error to be known, we assume that replications of the surrogates of the latent variables are available. The test statistic is based upon a weighted integrated squared distance between a nonparametric estimator and a semi-parametric estimator of the density functions of certain residuals. Under the null hypothesis, the test statistic is shown to be asymptotically normal. Consistency and local power results of the proposed test under fixed alternatives and local alternatives are also established. Finite sample performance of the proposed test is evaluated via simulation studies. A real data example is also included to demonstrate an application of the proposed test.     

Pitfalls of testing non-nested hypotheses by the lagrange multiplier method

In applied research in econometrics a general model determined from the current knowledge of economic theory often establishes a ‘natural’ method of embedding a number of otherwise non-nested hypotheses. Under these circumstances, significant tests of various hypotheses can be carried out within the classical framework, and tests of non-nested or separate families of hypotheses do not require development of new statistical methods. The application of some suitable variant of likelihood ratio testing procedure will be quite appropriate.There are, however, many ocassions in applied econometrics where the hypotheses under consideration are intended to provide genuine rival explanations of the same given phenomenon and the state of economic theory is not such as to furnish us with a general model that contains both of the rival hypotheses in a ‘natural’ and theoretically consistent manner. A number of investigators have advocated that even when a ‘natural’ comprehensive model containing both of the hypotheses under consideration cannot be obtained from theoretical considerations, it is still appropriate to base significant tests of non-nested hypotheses upon a combined model ‘artificially’ constructed from the rival alternatives. Moreover, in a recent paper on the application of Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests to model specification, T.S. Breusch and A.R. Pagan (1980) have claimed that Cox's test statistic is connected to an LM or ‘score’ statistic derived from the application of the LM method to an exponentially combined model earlier employed by A.C. Atkinson (1970).Although the use of ‘artificially’ constructed comprehensive models fortesting separate families of hypotheses is analytically tempting, nevertheless it is subject to two major difficulties. Firstly, in many cases of interest in econometrics, the structural parameters under the combined hypothesis are not identified. Secondly, the log likelihood function of the artificially constructed model has singularities under both the null and alternative hypotheses.The paper firstly examines the derivation of LM statistics in the case of non-nested hypotheses and shows that Atkinson's general test statistic, or Breusch and Pagan's result, can be regarded as an LM test if the parameters of the alternative hypothesis are known. The paper also shows that unless all the parameters of the combined models are identified, no meaningful test of the separate families of the hypotheses by the artificial embedding procedure is possible, and in the identified case an expression for the LM statistic which avoids the problem of the singularity of the information matrix under the null and the alternative hypotheses is obtained.The paper concludes that none of the artificially embedding procedures are satisfactory for testing non-nested models and should be abandoned. It, however, emphasizes that despite these difficulties associated with the use of artificial embedding procedures, Cox's original statistic (which is not derived as an LM statistic and does not depend on any arbitrary synthetic combination of hypotheses) can still be employed as a useful procedure for testing the rival hypotheses often encountered in applied econometrics.     

The power of bootstrap and asymptotic tests

The bootstrap discrepancy measures the difference in rejection probabilities between a bootstrap test and one based on the true distribution. The order of magnitude of the bootstrap discrepancy is the same under the null hypothesis and under non-null processes described by Pitman drift. If the test statistic is not an exact pivot, critical values depend on which data-generating process (DGP) is used to determine the null distribution. We propose using the DGP which minimizes the bootstrap discrepancy. We also show that, under an asymptotic independence condition, the power of both bootstrap and asymptotic tests can be estimated cheaply by simulation.     

Evaluating GARCH models

In this paper, a unified framework for testing the adequacy of an estimated GARCH model is presented. Parametric Lagrange multiplier (LM) or LM type tests of no ARCH in standardized errors, linearity, and parameter constancy are proposed. The asymptotic null distributions of the tests are standard, which makes application easy. Versions of the tests that are robust against nonnormal errors are provided. The finite sample properties of the test statistics are investigated by simulation. The robust tests prove superior to the nonrobust ones when the errors are nonnormal. They also compare favourably in terms of power with misspecification tests previously proposed in the literature.