共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
William Martin 《Journal of Business Ethics》2009,90(4):549-560
Socially responsible investing identifies the fiduciary duty and liability for financial advisors serving individual and institutional
clients when consulting in the SRI space. This article first discusses the role of a fiduciary emerging from both a legal
and an ethical basis. Further, the special aspects of maintaining fiduciary duty and minimizing fiduciary liability are described
as they relate to SRI. A number of recommendations are discussed: legal, ethical, and practice. This study argues that prudence
focuses more on the process of decisions rather than their outcomes, as measured exclusively by rate of return. 相似文献
2.
Geert Demuijnck 《Journal of Business Ethics》2009,88(1):83-101
The purpose of socially responsible investing (SRI) is to: (1) allow investors to reflect their personal values and ethics in their choices, and (2) encourage companies to improve their ethical, social, and environmental performance. In order to achieve these ends, the means SRI fund managers employ include the use of negative screening, or the exclusion of companies involved in “sinful” industries. We argue that there are problems with this methodology, both at a theoretical and at a practical level. As a consequence, current SRI offerings cannot accurately reflect the values and ethical beliefs they propose to represent. Moreover, the use of a?priori criteria is potentially misleading, as we show by discussing examples of glue and wine making. Applying this flawed approach SRI funds fail to influence the direction of the firms they deem most in need of re-directing. Rather than engaging in the simple a?priori assumption that some industries are “saints” while others are “sinners” (Freeman, 2007) we suggest a new framework upon which the SRI screening methodology could be grounded. Embracing the philosophical tradition of American pragmatism, we suggest that SRI methodology could be improved by engaging in an analysis based on (1) the actual impacts of the company’s products and services, (2) the company’s relationships with its specific, real stakeholders, and (3) the contingent environment (social, economic, political, legal, and cultural) in which the business operates. 相似文献
3.
Mark Jonathan Rhodes 《Journal of Business Ethics》2010,95(1):145-150
Selecting, applying and reporting on investment screens for socially responsible investing (SRI) presents challenges for companies, investors and fund managers. This article seeks to clarify the nature of these challenges in developing an understanding of the foundations of ethical investment screens. At a conceptual level this work argues that there is a common element to the ethical foundations of SRI, even with very different apparent motivations and investment restrictions. Establishing this commonality assists in explaining the information asymmetry problem inherent in SRI. A market-facilitated solution illustrates how these insights might foster the development of socially responsible investment. 相似文献
4.
How new is socially responsible investment? 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
Robert Taylor 《Business ethics (Oxford, England)》2000,9(3):174-179
Much recent comment has been concerned with a perceived distinction between socially responsible investment (SRI) and the older style of ethical investment, which operates on the basis of exclusion criteria. However, the distinction between SRI and ethical investment is not as clear‐cut as some reports have implied, in that some of the longer‐established funds have SRI characteristics. An example is the CIS's Environ Trust, established in 1990, the operation of which has recently assisted the CIS in the adoption of SRI schemes for all its funds. The application of SRI introduces to mainstream funds the principle of engagement with companies. Investment is then based on the selection of 'best practice' companies rather than on criteria of exclusion. This suggests that there is scope for applying the experience of specialised ethical funds to the encouragement of greater social awareness by large shareholders in general. 相似文献
5.
Socially responsible investment (SRI) has increasingly assumed a major role in global equity markets. In this article we argue that the continued growth in investors seeking to align their ethical concerns with their investment strategies may influence the way in which the employment relationship is managed in publicly-listed corporations. After tracing the historical development of SRI, its implications for the conduct of human resource management (HRM) are examined. We conclude by analysing a number of the key problems associated with investor confidence in SRI funds and present a range of suggested techniques for improving screening methodologies. 相似文献
6.
Socially responsible investment: insights from Shari'a departments in Islamic financial institutions
Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) are emerging as prominent players in the financial world and are increasingly known for their conservative socially responsible investment (SRI). Being the Shari'a regulators and monitors of IFIs, the Shari'a departments are expected to implement the Islamic perspective of SRI – drawn from Shari'a principles – in their respective institutions. The purpose of this paper is to develop an SRI framework applicable to IFIs and other Shari'a compliant entities and assess its applicability within Shari'a departments of two Islamic banks. This paper involves cross‐case analysis based on interviews with Shari'a department officials in two settings differentiated by their respective independence. The proposed framework consists of required, expected and desired SRI aspects as applicable to IFIs. The findings reveal that the required aspects are uniformly observed by the two cases. There are, however, variations when it comes to observing the expected and desired ethical SRI aspects that may be driven by the independence of the Shari'a boards. This inconsistency and non‐adherence of expected and desired aspects may lead to reputational risks in the long run. 相似文献
7.
Why Wine is not Glue? The Unresolved Problem of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
The purpose of socially responsible investing (SRI) is to: (1) allow investors to reflect their personal values and ethics
in their choices, and (2) encourage companies to improve their ethical, social, and environmental performance. In order to
achieve these ends, the means SRI fund managers employ include the use of negative screening, or the exclusion of companies
involved in “sinful” industries. We argue that there are problems with this methodology, both at a theoretical and at a practical
level. As a consequence, current SRI offerings cannot accurately reflect the values and ethical beliefs they propose to represent.
Moreover, the use of a␣priori criteria is potentially misleading, as we show by discussing examples of glue and wine making. Applying this flawed approach
SRI funds fail to influence the direction of the firms they deem most in need of re-directing. Rather than engaging in the
simple a␣priori assumption that some industries are “saints” while others are “sinners” (Freeman, 2007) we suggest a new framework upon which
the SRI screening methodology could be grounded. Embracing the philosophical tradition of American pragmatism, we suggest
that SRI methodology could be improved by engaging in an analysis based on (1) the actual impacts of the company’s products
and services, (2) the company’s relationships with its specific, real stakeholders, and (3) the contingent environment (social,
economic, political, legal, and cultural) in which the business operates. 相似文献
8.
In this article, we document the growing influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the realm of socially responsible
investing (SRI). Drawing from ethical and economic perspectives on stakeholder management and agency theory, we develop a
framework to understand how and when NGOs will be most influential in shaping the ethical and social responsibility orientations
of business using the emergence of SRI as the primary influencing vehicle. We find that NGOs have opportunities to influence
corporate conduct via direct, indirect, and interactive influences on the investment community, and that the overall influence
of NGOs as major actors in socially responsible investment is growing, with attendant consequences for corporate strategy,
governance, and social performance. 相似文献
9.
Jacob Park 《International Journal of Consumer Studies》2009,33(2):206-214
The origins of the modern socially responsible investment (SRI) movement can be traced to the turbulent period in the 1960s when powerful social undercurrents including environmentalism and anti‐war activism fuelled a rise, in a radical change, in the way society viewed faith, values and commerce. Today, nearly 1 out of every US$9 under professional management in the US is currently invested using social investment strategies while the European green and ethical investment market is estimated to be €1 trillion or as much as 10–15% of the total funds under management. While some preliminary figures and analyses exist for countries outside these two regions, SRI has been, to date, largely explored within the context of North America and Europe. This is unfortunate as the sustainability of SRI as a consumer market is going to depend, to a great extent, to what happens outside of North America and Europe, and most notably in the rapidly developing Asian economies. In this article, I will explore the development of SRI as a mainstream financial consumer instrument in industrialized (Japan) and emerging (Hong Kong/China) economies of the Asia Pacific region. To fully analyse the SRI market development in Hong Kong and Japan, I will examine the following three issues and questions: first, how does the sustainable consumption framework offer a useful lens from which to explore SRI, and why is the Asia Pacific market and policy context so important for the broader issue of sustainable consumption? Second, what precisely is SRI and how did it develop into an important global financial investment vehicle? Third, how did the SRI market develop in the case of Hong Kong and Japan? I will then conclude the article with some analysis on the important lessons SRI market development in Hong Kong and Japan hold for market sustainability of the financial sector and sustainable consumption. 相似文献
10.
Herwig Pilaj 《Journal of Business Ethics》2017,140(4):743-753
This paper applies insights from behavioral economics and nudge theory to foster sustainable and responsible investment (SRI). SRI provides an opportunity to express and promote ethical values via choice of financial instruments. While policy-makers have tried to encourage greater participation in SRI, the majority of retail investors retain a conventional approach to investment. I develop a conceptual framework to improve the effectiveness of SRI policy-making. The first part of the framework comprises a transmission mechanism which emphasizes the role of SRI as a driver for sustainable development. The second part is a model of the individual decision for or against SRI. The framework suggests that low SRI demand is a case of behavioral market failure, and that nudging is a suitable tool for dismantling behavioral barriers to SRI. A specific example of smart choice architecture is used to illustrate the framework’s potential in the design of an SRI nudge. Assuming the nudge stands up to the rigors of empirical testing, it may well provide a feasible alternative for policy-makers. 相似文献
11.
Does Sustainability Investment Provide Adaptive Resilience to Ethical Investors? Evidence from Spain
Eduardo Ortas José M. Moneva Roger Burritt Joanne Tingey-Holyoak 《Journal of Business Ethics》2014,124(2):297-309
Although sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) has quite recently become a hot research topic, scarcely any systematic research has been paid to the performance of this non-conventional approach to investment during the financial crisis that emerged in mid-2008 when the resilience of the financial markets was sorely tested. Such real-world resilience in practice is the subject of the current research which tests whether environmental, social and governance screens provides ethical investors with adaptive resilience in bull and bear market conditions by focussing on the SRI equity index of one of the most active markets in Europe in terms of ethical investment, the FTSE4Good-Ibex in Spain. Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (M-GARCH) analysis indicates that ethical investors in the equity market examined with evidence that greater resilience in severe business cycle shocks could be attributable to SRI by companies. Although limited to a single country study, the results have implications for investors seeking resilience in crisis: when individual values and beliefs towards sustainability tie with personal investment strategy, the end result is adaptive financial resilience, social well-being and environmental defence. 相似文献
12.
Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): what have we learned? A meta‐analysis
With a meta‐analysis of 85 studies and 190 experiments, the authors test the relationship between socially responsible investing (SRI) and financial performance to determine whether including corporate social responsibility and ethical concerns in portfolio management is more profitable than conventional investment policies. The study also analyses the influence of researcher methodologies with respect to several dimensions of SRI (markets, financial performance measures, investment horizons, SRI thematic approaches, family investments and journal impact) on the effects identified. The results indicate that the consideration of corporate social responsibility in stock market portfolios is neither a weakness nor a strength compared with conventional investments; the heterogeneous results in prior studies largely reflect the SRI dimensions under study (e.g. thematic approach, investment horizon and data comparison method). 相似文献
13.
We investigate the impact of national culture on socially responsible investment (SRI) fund flows. Drawing on prior literature suggesting that non-financial attributes and social preferences explain SRI decisions, we hypothesize that cultural traits may drive SRI fund flows. We use a dataset covering mutual funds from 45 countries over the period 1997 to 2019. Our results reveal that higher SRI flows are associated with low masculinity and uncertainty avoidance and, to a lesser extent, to high religiosity.On the contrary, power distance and individualism affect conventional fund flows but do not have any significant differential effect on ethical money flows. 相似文献
14.
Joakim Sandberg 《Business ethics (Oxford, England)》2007,16(1):71-86
This paper discusses the idea that investors have moral reasons to avoid investing in certain business areas based on their own moral views towards these areas. Some have referred to this as 'conscience investing', and it is a central part of the conception of ethical investing within the socially responsible investment (SRI) movement. The paper presents what is taken to be the main arguments for this kind of investing as they are given by those who have defended it, and discusses the plausibility of these arguments from the point of view of moral philosophy. The paper argues that focusing on the moral views of individual investors is not very fruitful – there are strong reasons to think that investors do not have moral reasons to invest 'with their consciences', or, to the extent that such reasons are allowed, that they are very weak compared with other sorts of moral reasons pertaining to ethical investing. 相似文献
15.
Objectives of socially responsible investment (SRI) are discussed with reference to the two main mechanisms of the SRI ‘movement’:
shareholder advocacy and managed investments. We argue that in their current forms, both mechanisms lack the power to create
significant corporate change. Shareholder advocacy has been largely unsuccessful to date. Even if resolutions were successful,
shareholder advocacy may still be ineffective if underlying economic opportunities remain. Marketing material and investment
prospectuses issued by socially responsible mutual funds (SRI funds) commonly contain the claim that, by affecting corporations'
access to capital funding, SRI funds can change corporate practices. This paper makes a contribution by presenting the market
share of SRI funds in the regions where they are most developed, being Europe, the U.S. and Australia, to show that this claim
is unlikely to eventuate. SRI funds also commonly claim that they will outperform conventional active mutual funds. That the
economic performances of both are similar might be explained by their similar portfolio compositions. The paper makes an innovation
in the SRI literature by adopting a legitimacy framework to explain the continued presence of SRI funds. To achieve desired
social and environmental outcomes, SRI funds are urged to address issues at a more systemic level. A suggested mechanism is
the collective lobbying of corporations and, especially, governments. 相似文献
16.
Jonas Nilsson 《Journal of Business Ethics》2008,83(2):307-325
This article addresses the growing industry of retail socially responsible investment (SRI) profiled mutual funds. Very few
previous studies have examined the final consumer of SRI profiled mutual funds. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to,
in an exploratory manner, examine the impact of a number of pro-social, financial performance, and socio-demographic variables
on SRI behavior in order to explain why investors choose to invest different proportions of their investment portfolio in
SRI profiled funds. An ordinal logistic regression analysis on 528 private investors revealed that two of the three pro-social
variables had a positive impact on how much the consumer invested in SRI profiled funds. Moreover, there was proof of a non-altruistic
motive for investing in SRI as consumers who perceive that financial return of SRI is equal or better than “regular” mutual
funds, invested a greater proportion of their portfolio in SRI profiled mutual funds. Furthermore, the results showed that
women and better-educated investors were more likely to invest a greater proportion of their investment portfolio in SRI.
Overall, the findings indicate that both financial perceptions and pro-social attitudes are connected to consumer investment
in SRI. 相似文献
17.
Amelia Bilbao-Terol Mar Arenas-Parra Verónica Cañal-Fernández Celia Bilbao-Terol 《Journal of Business Ethics》2013,115(3):515-529
This paper presents a novel framework for selecting socially responsible investment (SRI) portfolios. The Hedonic Price Method (HPM) is applied to obtain an evaluation of SRI criteria that is integrated into a multi-objective mathematical programming model. The HPM breaks away from the traditional view that goods are the direct object of utility; on the contrary, it assumes that utility is derived from the properties or characteristics of the goods themselves. As far as the investment decision is concerned, we assume that socially responsible investmentmutual funds (SRI funds) constitute heterogeneous goods. Our approach allows us to obtain a portfolio, the financial performance of which is similar to that which the investor would have reached if he or she had not taken into account social, ethical, and environmental considerations when making his or her investment decisions. This is achieved by designing a two-stage multi-objective mathematical programming procedure. In the first stage, we achieve the maximum level of financial satisfaction that the investor can receive. In the second stage, the portfolio with the best financial–social behavior is built. For the purpose of this second stage, the first stage portfolio is used as a benchmark for the financial performance of a socially responsible portfolio. To apply this methodology, we use portfolios composed of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds domiciled in Spain. 相似文献
18.
The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
This paper reviews the development of socially responsible investment (SRI) over recent years and highlights the prospects
for an increasingly strong connection with the practice of corporate social responsibility. The paper argues that not only
has SRI grown significantly, it has also matured. In particular, it has become an investment philosophy adopted by a growing
proportion of large investment institutions. This shift in SRI from margin to mainstream and the position in which institutional
investors find themselves is leading to a new form of SRI shareholder pressure. Although this bears some resemblance to lobbying
campaigns which might take advantage of shareholder rights, we seek to distinguish it as an important phenomenon in its own
right — one to which corporate executives are likely to be paying increasing attention in the years to come. We further argue
that this approach potentially meets some of the earlier ethical criticisms of certain forms of SRI but, ironically, probably
owes its existence to those pioneering approaches. We conclude with some suggestions for further research to inform discussion
of the issues highlighted in the paper. 相似文献
19.
Greig A. Mill 《Journal of Business Ethics》2006,63(2):131-148
This paper empirically examines the financial performance of a UK unit trust that was initially “conventional” and later adopted
socially responsible investment (SRI) principles (ethical investment principles). Comparison is made with three similar conventional
funds whose investment objectives remained unchanged. Analysis techniques employed in previous studies find similar results:
mean risk-adjusted performance is unchanged by the switch to SRI, with no evidence of over-or under-performance relative to
the benchmark market index by any of the four funds. More interestingly, changes in variability of returns over time are also
modelled using generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models, not previously applied to SRI funds so far
as is known. Results show a temporary increase in variability of returns, followed by a return to previous levels after around
4 years. Evidence shows the increased variability to be associated with the adoption of SRI rather than with a change in fund
management. Possible explanations for the subsequent reduction in variability include the spread of corporate social responsibility
activities by firms and learning by fund managers. In addition to reporting on a previously unobserved phenomenon, this paper
raises questions for further research. 相似文献
20.
For more than 15 years, the investment community and the academic community have written extensively on socially responsible investment (SRI). Despite the abundance of SRI thought, the adoption of SRI practices among institutional investors is a comparative rarity. This paper endeavours to achieve two goals. First, by integrating the practitioner and academic literature on the topic, the paper attempts to identify the many impediments to SRI in Europe from an institutional investor's perspective. Second, the paper proposes a unitary framework to conceptually organize the impediments to SRI by using insights from different relevant research perspectives: behavioural finance, organizational behaviour, institutional theory, economic sociology, management science and finance. The paper concludes by presenting the main shortcomings within both the academic and the practitioner literature on SRI and by providing conceptual and methodological recommendations for further research. 相似文献