LEASING AND THE US 1986 TAX REFORM ACT

The US 1986 Tax Reform Act (TRA) contains several tax provisions affecting many areas of corporate finance including lease financing. One of the more important provisions is the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) which determines an alternative in addition to the usual tax computation, and consequently results in a new lessee-lessor tax-asymmetry. To investigate the overall impact on the net advantage of leasing (NAL) of both the AMT and the other relevant provisions of the TRA, a leasing model is developed which incorporates these tax provisions. In the context of this leasing model, the following results are derived. When the AMT provision does not apply, the Tax Reform Act (TRA) reduces substantially the net advantage of leasing (NAL) over buying. In contrast, the effect of the AMT symmetry is positive. As a result, the combined effect of the AMT and the other changes in the TRA on the NAL is negligible for property class of assets of the more common length of time (about ten years), but becomes negative for real-property type of assets.     

THE EFFECT OF TRADING IN EIGHTHS ON SECURITY RETURN BEHAVIOR

Currently the equity securities of most British, Canadian and US firms trade in eighths. However, this pricing system may soon be abandoned in the US. Specifically, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is currently studying the feasibility of changing the pricing of US securities to dollars and cents from dollars and eighths. 'SEC officials contend that moving to a system that quotes stock prices in dollars and cents would create efficiency in the stock market that eighths and sometimes sixteenths can't permit' (Torres and Salwen, 1991). This paper demonstrates the inefficiencies that result from constraining stocks to trade in eighths of a dollar. It describes the effects on returns and betas; then, it presents empirical evidence consistent with the effects. Systematic differences in the distributions of returns of low and high-priced stocks are documented. The covariance of returns with a market index is shown to vary systematically across stocks of different prices and to depend on the return interval used to estimate market model parameters. The variations are explainable by an observed lag between the returns of low-priced stocks relative to those of high-priced stocks. The lag is partially attributable to trading in eighths. A systematic relationship that varies with share price is observed between market model residual returns and unadjusted returns. This relationship is not eliminated by using longer return intervals alone. The extent of the relationship is reduced when longer return intervals are combined with the use of a market index composed of stocks that are priced similarly to those of the securities being tested. The implications of these results for capital market studies are discussed.     

FURTHER EVIDENCE ON DIVIDEND YIELDS AND THE EX-DIVIDEND DAY STOCK PRICE EFFECT

Ex-dividend day stock price behavior supports a tax clientele effect. This effect is still found after the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Results reflect an effective tax advantage for capital gains taxes payable at realization, versus dividend taxes due quarterly. Evidence also supports short-term trader participation in the ex-day phenomenon when the difference between dividend income and the ex-dividend-day price decrease exceeds transactions costs to trade. Results contradict prior research where a tax clientele effect is not found, but align with this prior research when including a small number of contaminated observations.     

EX-DIVIDEND DAY PRICE CHANGES AND IMPLIED TAX RATES: AN EVALUATION

The ratio of price changes to dividends is sometimes used to assess personal tax rates and detect tax clientele for dividends. It is suggested here that the model is unable to detect possible tax effects, given the sample sizes available to most researchers.     

THE EFFECT OF TAX PREFERENCES ON HEALTH SPENDING

In this paper, we estimate the effect of the tax preference for health insurance on health care spending using data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys from 1996-2005. We use the fact that Social Security taxes are only levied on earnings below a statutory threshold to identify the impact of the tax preference. Because employer-sponsored health insurance premiums are excluded from Social Security payroll taxes, workers who earn just below the Social Security tax threshold receive a larger tax preference for health insurance than workers who earn just above it. We find a significant effect of the tax preference, consistent with previous research.     

加快推进资源税整体改革

2010年我国资源税改革取得重要进展,后续改革任务仍很重,建议采用扩大地域范围和扩大产品覆盖范围两条线分别梯次推进的方法,加快推进资源税整体改革。     

AN ANALYSIS OF THE AUTO CHOICE REFORM ACT OF 1997

Abstract: The authors examine the nuances involved in no-fault coverage. They focus their examination on the concept of choice, providing a perspective on both coverage and constitutional questions.     

THE MARKET REACTION TO THE 1986 TAX OVERHAUL: A STUDY OF THE CAPITAL GAIN TAX CHANGE

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA) eliminated the favorable tax treatment on long-term capital gains in the US. Using a standard event study… CONTENTS AND ABSTRACTS 111 methodology, this paper examines daily stock return reactions to the tax overhaul. The results show that high dividend yield stocks earned a significant positive abnormal return and low yield stocks a significant negative return during the legislation period. This finding is consistent with the notion that the TRA made the market valuation of stocks shift in favor of high yield stocks.     

THE EFFECT OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991 ON BANK STOCKS

In this study we use a multivariate regression model to investigate the effect of the passage of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) of 1991 on returns to the shareholders of bank-holding companies. The empirical results suggest that the shareholders of well-capitalized banks benefited from the enactment of the FDICIA, while those of undercapitalized banks experienced significant losses during the announcement period. However, the shareholders of adequately capitalized banks did not gain or lose significantly from the enactment of the FDICIA. The FDICIA also affected stock returns of large and small bank-holding companies similarly.     

ON DERIVING THE INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN FROM THE ACCOUNTANT'S RATE OF RETURN

L.A. Gordon (J.B.F.A. Vol. 1 No, 3) claims to have derived a method for approximating the IRR using the ARR. This paper demonstrates that the key relationship in Gordon's paper is only valid if the IRR is already known and used to calculate economic depreciation. It is suggested that Gordon has merely derived a means for refining ARR, but not for deriving IRR.
Dans son article paru dam Vol. 1 No 3 de ce journal, L.A. Gordon prétend avoir introduit une méthode qui permet d'évaluer "Internal Rate of Return" au moyen de "Accountant's Rate of Return". Ce papier démontre que le rapport-clé dont Gordon nous fait part n'est vérifiable que si "Internal Rate of Return" est préablement connu et sert a calculer l'amortissement économique. On insinue ainsi que Gordon a simplement présenté un moyen de perfectionner "Accountant's Rate of Return" mais n'en a pas démontré pour autant l'évaluation de "Internal Rate of Return".
L.A. Gordon (J.B.F.A. Band 1, Nr. 3) behauptet, er habe eine Annäherungsmethode abgeleitet, womit der interne Zinsfuss von dem RO1 Kriterium berechnet werden kann. Dieser Beitrag zeright, dass das Schlüsselverhältnis in Gordons Abhandlung nur dann gültig ist wenn der interne Zinsfull schon bekannt ist und als kalkulatorischer Zinssatz für ökonomische Abschreibungsbetrage verwendet wird. Es wird behauptet, dass Gordon keine Methode für die Ableitung des internen Zinsfusses entwickelt hat, sondern nur eine für die Verbesserung des R01 Kriteriums.