基于KPI的绿色建筑项目绩效管理研究

大力发展绿色建筑,成为我国解决能源危机的重要措施之一.文章在参考相关文献资料、借助绿色建筑建设管理经验的基础上,对业主与绿色专项咨询机构直接签订委托协议PMC模式下基于关键绩效指标(KPI)的绿色建筑项目绩效管理各步骤内涵进行了分析研究,构建了此模式下基于KPI的绿色建筑项目绩效管理一般流程.     

电网公司本部全员量化绩效考核研究

目前,企业的绩效管理方法主要采用基于关键绩效指标（KPI）或平衡计分卡的绩效考核评价模式。KPI通过企业内部流程的输入端、产出端的关键参数进行设置、取样、计算、分析,并予以衡量流程绩效,进行目标化指标管理,它将企业战略目标分解为可操作的具体工作目标,并分解到各部门。华东电网有限公司（以下简称华东公司）进一步深化了KPI的指标考核应用,将公司的战略目标聚焦到关键绩效领域（KPA）,再进一步分解为KPI．最终落实到员工岗位工作任务和工作计划,实现业绩考核。     

企业绩效管理的KPI方法及其实施

本文讨论了关键绩效指标(KPI)的概念及其确定原则和过程，并着重从KPI与IT相结合和KPI目标设定的层次性这两个角度，分析了企业实施肥应注意的问题。     

建立实时KPI系统

<正>供电企业实时KPI系统在选用中要应用商务智能先进的原理、工具,以业务需求为主线,围绕供电局关键绩效指标,综合运用数据仓库、在线分析处理、数学分析模型等手段,建立自上而下一致的业务指标视图,通过横向主题分析、纵向专题分析,让决策者、管理者、业务人员能及时获取所关注的指标信息,为辅助决策提供依据,提高经营、决策的能力,提高以目标指标为导向的管理能力。     

财政专项水利标准化预算项目绩效评价指标设置探析

文章针对财政专项水利标准化预算项目绩效评价中"项目产出"和"项目效果"指标设置存在的不足,探究水利标准化项目绩效指标设置原则和关键点,并对水利标准化项目绩效评价提出建议。     

KPI：指引绩效考核走向成功

辽宁省电力有限公司自2006年开始推行适应本公司特点及发展需要的，以KPI（关键绩效指标Key Performance Indicators）为核心方法的员工绩效考核改革，采用KPI模式，将企业的发展战略目标结合部门／岗位职能进行分解，制定出动态、量化、规范的关键绩效评价指标及工作目标，建立了与现代企业制度相适应的人力资源管理制度。通过实施全员绩效考核制度，     

科学构建关键业绩指标体系

随着现代化发电企业信息管理系统的日臻成熟和完善,电厂项目从基建管理到运营管理都发生了巨大的变化.随着自动化水平的提高,电厂项目实现以更少的人员,完成同样的基建、运营任务,这就要求员工的工作更高效,结构更合理,才能全面满足电厂项目生产、运营的要求.而科学运用以关键业绩指标(KPI)为导向的员工绩效管理,可以充分调动员工积极性,激励、引导员工努力工作,不断提高员工综合素质和绩效.     

发展结果导向的公共项目绩效管理理念

在公共项目的绩效管理中引入“发展结果导向管理”理论和方法,改变了以往以投入产出理论为基础,注重项目的经济评价的的传统方法。发展结果导向的公共项目绩效管理要求关注项目的长期发展目标,在项目各个阶段致力于与结果相关的对话。运用结果链——投入、活动、产出、产效和影响,以及这些关键要素之间的因果关系进行绩效管理,同时运用绩效管理逻辑框架对项目的绩效进行监测评估。     

KPI：指引绩效考核走向成功

辽宁省电力有限公司自2006年开始推行适应本公司特点及发展需要的,以KPI(关键绩效指标Key Performance Indicators)为核心方法的员工绩效考核改革,采用KPI模式,将企业的发展战略目标结合部门/岗位职能进行分解,制定出动态、量化、规范的关键绩效评价指标及工作目标,建立了与现代企业制度相适应的人力资源管理制度。通过实施全员绩效考核制度,将员工的工作行为和个人发展目标与企业的发展战略目标紧密地联系在一起,通过客观准确地评     

我国电力企业绩效管理的发展

高度关注生产性和安全性绩效指标——注重财务指标和国际领先指标——提出法人资本金绩效评价——出台《中央企业负责人经营业绩考核暂行办法》——关注企业价值尤其是市场价值,引入关键绩效指标(KPI)体系、平衡积分卡(BSC)、经济增加值(EVA)等先进的绩效管理工具,注重建立系统的绩效管理体系。     

Roles for developing public–private partnerships in centralized public procurement

This study examines the roles actors play to develop public–private partnerships (PPPs) in the context of centralized public procurement and how these roles change during the procurement process. The roles are explored by applying role theory and the typologies of managerial and intermediary roles and by utilizing a triadic approach to distinguish these roles in raw food and home nursing procurement settings. The findings of this study increase the understanding of PPPs by identifying the roles for developing PPP relationships and how these roles are played to reinforce this development in centralized public procurement. Furthermore, the findings contribute to the research on relationship dynamics by showing how actors' roles and the performance of those change and are influenced by the public procurement context and the roles the other actors undertake during the centralized public procurement process. The study yields insights for managers of public and private organizations seeking to develop stronger PPPs and improve public procurement.     

Anatomy of a public-private partnership: Hold-up and regulatory commitment in Ultrafast Broadband

In recent years, the preference for purely private funding and ownership of telecommunications networks has given way to a ‘new wisdom’ that some form of public funding is now likely necessary if faster and more capacious next generation access (NGA) networks are to be constructed in a timely fashion for the majority of the population. Policy-makers are charged with deciding how that public investment will take place. One approach is via Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs), where public and private actors collaborate in UFB (Ultrafast Fibre Broadband) investment, construction and operation. However, the body of analysis of PPPs in NGA networks to guide policy-makers is scant.By using the concept of regulatory commitment, the paper compares the experiences gained in a hold-up situation in PPPs in other infrastructures (e.g. roading) with the UFB context. A case study of New Zealand's Ultrafast Fibre Broadband Initiative is used to draw new insights for government purchasers and regulatory agencies. In comparing the different forms of PPPs, the paper shows that UFB PPPs reverse the typical direction of financing and ownership observed in roading PPPs. Financing and asset ownership are separated in UFB PPPs, increasing the potential for misalignment of incentives and the likelihood that the public party can use its legislative powers to alter regulatory settings after the PPP contract is signed, and thereby hold up the private party once existing network assets are sunk. Whilst the government instigating the PPP may not be inclined to act opportunistically, a successive government facing different political priorities does not face the same incentives. To the extent that the private party can anticipate this risk, it should structure the initial agreement to ensure that the public party is penalised if such an event occurs (i.e. an automatic right to favourable renegotiation or payment of compensation). Such terms will discourage opportunism, so that the project benefits from time-consistent alignment of incentives and objectives.     

Public-Private Partnerships and Prices: Evidence from Water Distribution in France

We use an original database of 5000 French local public authorities to explore the impact of organizational choice and performance as measured by consumer prices. In quantifying the impact of the choice of public-private partnerships (PPPs) on performance, we consider the related issue of the determinants of organizational choice. We estimate a switching regressions model to account for the endogeneity of organizational choice, and find that in our sample, (i) the choice by local public authorities to engage in a PPP is not random, and (ii) conditional on the choice of a PPP, consumer prices are significantly higher on average.     

Providing incentives for private investment in municipal broadband networks: Evidence from the Netherlands

The paper examines the incentives provided by public–private partnerships (PPPs) to stimulate private market parties to participate in municipal fibre networks in the Netherlands. Although there has been a growing interest of Dutch municipalities in fibre technologies since the beginning of the 2000s, PPP models to implement these technologies developed rather slowly in response to changes in public policy, the legislative environment and experiences gained in early projects. In 2005, the viability of a cooperative PPP model called “Ons Net” Nuenen was tested in an experimental setting for the first time using government subsidies. In undertaking a techno-economic analysis of the PPP “Ons Net” in Nuenen, the paper examines its objectives, boundaries and viability. It shows that the experience of this PPP based on ubiquity, open fibre access and demand aggregation provided important incentives for companies to invest in (other) municipal fibre networks in the Netherlands. The paper concludes furthermore that mandating of open access will become a key task for (local) governments to foster competitive entry and to facilitate innovation in municipal fibre networks.     

PPP合同风险识别和分配

公私合作（PPP）模式是国际上运用于基础设施建设的最新模式,通过公私合作的形式,越来越多的私营部门开始投资、建设、管理甚至拥有基础设施。文章通过分析PPP项目成功的关键因素,识别PPP合同可能存在的风险因素,并提出合同风险的分配方法。     

PPP模式在成都市保障性住房中的应用

为了从根本上解决成都市中低收入居民的居住问题,成都市政府近年来采取了多种措施试图对商品房地产市场进行有效调控,缓解政府部门公益性建设项目的融资压力,实现居者有其屋的目的。PPP(Public-Private-Partnership)模式是近年来广泛应用于基础设施建设融资领域的一种新型融资模式,本文对政府部门和私营企业双方在成都市保障性住房建设中应用PPP模式的可行性及政府部门与私营企业合作融资建设的可行方式进行了分析,提出了应用中可能存在的问题并给出了相应建议,结果认为将PPP模式应用于保障性住房融资可以达到公与私双赢,且有助于完善保障性住房制度。     

境外项目质量KPI考核方法探讨

从东方地球物理公司境外地震作业工序质量管理的现状出发，重点阐述了从项目的技术标准及质量要求、质量考核绩效指标的确定、质量考核绩效指标的量化、质量的持续改进和质量考核效果分析等5个方面，如何做好质量KPI考核工作，并且持续提升和改进境外项目的质量管理能力和水平．从而使产品质量符合顾客的要求，进一步提高东方公司境外项目的产品质量和全球综合竞争实力进行了有益的探索。     

社会资本视角下棚户区改造PPP项目风险分析

为了降低棚改PPP项目中的风险,提高社会资本参与棚改PPP项目的积极性,以社会资本方为研究视角。通过文献回顾和案例分析,总结社会资本参与棚改PPP项目面临的主要问题,筛选出社会资本参与棚改PPP项目面临的17个主要风险因素;运用DEMATEL法分析各风险因素的重要程度及相互影响关系,确定政府信用风险、相关法律法规不健全风险、市场收益不足风险、规划设计风险为关键风险因素;针对关键风险因素提出社会资本方防范措施,即多举措并举、细化合同条款、合理界定棚改PPP项目使用者付费范围、选择实力强的设计院是防范社会资本的有力措施。研究结果为分析棚改PPP项目风险提供了新思路,有助于提高社会资本参与棚改项目的积极性,所提对策对社会资本合理规避棚改PPP项目关键风险具有重要的借鉴意义。     

Private participation in government-led backbone network projects: Lessons from three Latin American experiments

This study presents an ex post comparative assessment of the relative performance of three Latin American broadband network emblematic projects implemented through public-private projects (PPP). Results show that the relative performance of these projects is extremely sensitive to differences in contractual design and regulatory approaches applied in each case. The detailed examination and comparative analysis of these experiences allowed us to extract important lessons in terms of design and implementation of PPP in telecommunications sector. In particular, our analysis finds that imperfect financing and demand risk allocations in projects can jeopardize their operational and financial sustainability. As well, the examination of these experiences allows us to conclude that in markets characterized by continuous economic and technological transformations, vertical separation restrictions imposed for reducing the risk of increasing market power and concentration may not be justified. As well, analysis shows that in such evolving contexts, a more flexible and adaptable regulatory approach is recommendable. Finally, our analysis reveals the role of complementary policies in the context of the implementation of countries’ digital strategies, as a means that contribute to ensure the accomplishment of broadband accessibility national targets.     

Project and program decisions in research and development

Abstract . This paper describes the application of three comparative procedures for scaling the relative worth of research and development projects. One procedure which assigns a monetary value to each project in units comparable to those used to measure the resources consumed proved to be simple for judges to understand and apply. Its application to sets of projects drawn from two laboratories permits investigating the degree of consensus among subject judges with various organizational affiliations and responsibilities. Significant differences in behavior were observed. Both the methodological and behavioral findings are potentially valuable to researchers and administrators dealing with the R&D function in public and private sectors.