企业社会责任及利益相关者界定

近年来，企业社会责任成为一个热点话题。企业社会责任要求企业在实现股东利益的同时关注期它利益相关者。本文从企业社会责任理论入手，在研究企业与各利益相关群体关系的基础上，分析界定企业的利益相关者。     

利益相关者与企业社会责任的建立

随着当前企业社会问题频繁的出现,企业是否应该履行社会责任再一次成为国内外研究的重点,本文依据利益相关者的相关理论分析了企业履行社会责任的现状,并根据利益相关者理论拟构建适合我国企业的社会责任指标体系。     

企业社会责任中的利益相关者的问题

编辑老师:您好!我通过阅读报告,知道在企业社会责任当中,利益相关者理论有着很重要的意义,但是对于什么是利益相关者理论和利益相关者理论的运用仍感困惑,所以希望得到贵刊对问题的解答。     

企业社会责任信利益相关者界定

近年来,企业社会责任成为一个热点话题.企业社会责任要求企业在实现股东利益的同时关注其它利益相关者.本文从企业社会责任理论入手,在研究企业与各利益相关群体关系的基础上,分析界定企业的利益相关者.     

企业管理层内在激励研究

随着企业的发展,管理层激励不足的问题逐渐突显,企业管理成本上升,离职率增高等问题日益严重。因此,对企业管理层的激励问题进行思考和探索就成为一种必要。本文首先分析企业管理层需求因素,进而提出针对企业管理层的内在激励对策。     

企业社会责任与股东利益最大化的关系分析

当前企业社会责任越来越受到关注,什么是企业社会责任以及企业应该如何履行社会责任成为业界和学术界研究的重点.为了防止企业陷入认识误区,本文运用了三重底线理论,提出了企业社会责任首先是股东利益最大化,企业追求利润最大化与履行社会责任并不矛盾的观点,并在引用案例和理论研究成果的基础上,对所提出的观点加以论证.     

企业社会责任实现机制研究

企业社会责任的核心是企业在社会中的角色。从20世纪初企业社会责任思想在美国产生以来,学者们都认为企业要服务于公众,但实现这一目标的路径,即如何平衡社会公益与股东利益最大化的矛盾,学者们各持己见、争论激烈。企业社会责任的着眼点应该放在企业发展上;对于企业来说,遵纪守法,通过发展多创造就业机会,多纳税才是企业最大的社会责任。     

基于利益相关者理论的企业社会责任与社会责任会计

社会责任思想的逐渐盛行,使得企业越来越重视对社会责任的履行,但现实情况是企业对社会责任的认识尚未统一,也缺乏一个公认的社会责任评价体系。本文明确了对企业社会责任的本质与社会责任会计的认识,并在此基础上提出了引导企业承担社会责任以及利用社会责任会计的方法评价企业社会责任履行情况的一些建议。     

从利益相关者的需求分析企业社会责任

所谓企业社会责任是:企业在生产经营过程中或追求利润最大化的过程中,对企业周围社会环境应承担相应的社会义务,从而最终谋求企业的可持续发展。具体表现:企业在其自身的生产经营管理过程中,除了考虑股东的利益和企业自身的利益之外,还应该考虑与企业有密切关系的其他群体及社会的利益。不仅需要考虑生产经营过程中对企业本身存在利益,还应该考虑对其他群体及周边社会是否存在不利的影响,如污染环境、浪费资源、破坏自然等等因素。本文试图从利益相关者的需求进行分析,积极探讨企业履行社会责任。企业对社会责任的需求,主要来自于普通消费者、企业自身生产经营管理、雇员、其他利益相关者的需求。     

基于利益相关者的企业社会责任与企业价值实证分析

随着经济全球化发展,企业社会责任引起社会广泛关注并体现着企业的核心竞争力.选取2014-2019年上交所30家制造业上市公司为样本,从利益相关者视角,运用Eviews软件面板数据回归模型,分析企业社会责任对企业价值的影响.结果 表明,企业社会责任的履行与企业价值呈显著相关,其中对股东、员工、供应商、政府的社会责任与企业...     

商务部世贸司副司长鄂德峰：持续推动中国企业社会责任的深入发展

企业社会责任国际论坛已经举办了六届,在会议组织者的努力下,在各方的大力支持下,这个论坛正逐步成为中国,乃至全球企业社会责任领域具有代表性的重要盛会之一,而且也正成为宣传企业社会责任的一个重要品牌。     

Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility

We present an analysis of over 400 comments about complying with tax obligations extracted from online discussion forums for freelancers. While the topics investigated by much of the literature on taxpayer behaviour are theory driven, we aimed to explore the universe of online discussions about tax in order to extract those topics that are most relevant to taxpayers. The forum discussions were subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis, and we present a model of the ‘universe’ of tax as reflected in taxpayer discussions. The model comprises several main actors (tax laws, tax authority, tax practitioners, and the taxpayer’s social network) and describes the multiple ways in which they relate to taxpayers’ behaviour. We also conduct a more focused analysis to show that the majority of taxpayers seem unconcerned with many of the variables that have been the focus of tax behaviour research (e.g. audits, penalties, etc.), and that most people are motivated to be compliant and are more concerned with how to comply than whether to comply. Moreover, we discuss how these ‘real-world’ tax discussions question common assumptions in the study of tax behaviour and how they inform our understanding of business ethics more generally.     

企业与政府如何共同推进企业社会责任

企业社会责任全球化时代已经到来。这意味着,企业社会责任将成为全球范围内各类企业的共同语言和共同价值观念。国际社会责任标准ISO26000的即将面世,从一个侧面佐证了这一点。在企业全球化趋势下,企业无论国籍为何、性质为何、营运地为何,都必须自觉地履行一定的社会责任。这是企业“做人”的底线。     

用社会责任带动行业的发展——巴斯夫“1＋3”企业社会责任项目自我评估总结研讨会成功召开

“立邦涂料历史悠久,为什么甘愿先在‘1＋3’项目中做‘3’？”“是‘1’还是‘3’并不重要,重要的是带动更多的‘1’和更多的‘3’。”     

Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility

While Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has traditionally been the domain of the corporate sector, recognition of the growing significance of the Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (SME) sector has led to an emphasis on their social and environmental impact, illustrated by an increasing number of initiatives aimed at engaging SMEs in the CSR agenda. CSR has been well researched in large companies, but SMEs have received less attention in this area. This paper presents the findings from a U.K. wide study of socially responsible SMEs. The 24 companies studied were chosen as “exemplars” of␣CSR in SMEs. The aim of this study therefore is to progress understanding of both the limitations on and opportunities for CSR in SMEs through the exploration of exemplary characteristics in the study companies. Key areas of investigation were CSR terminology, the influence of managerial values, the nature of SME CSR activities, motivation for and benefits from engaging in CSR, and the challenges faced. The results of this study demonstrate some of the exemplary goals and principles needed to achieve social responsibility in SMEs, and begin to provide knowledge that could be used to engender learning in other SMEs. In particular, there is evidence that stakeholder theory may provide a framework in which SMEs and CSR can be understood. SMEs prefer to learn through networking and from their peers, so this is a possible avenue for greater SME engagement in CSR. This would require strong leadership or “championing” from individuals such as highly motivated owner–managers and from exemplary companies as a whole.Heledd Jenkins is a Research Associate at The ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society based at Cardiff University. She holds a degree in Geography from the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, and a Masters degree in Sustainability, Planning and Environmental Policy from Cardiff University. Heledd's research areas of interest include Corporate Social Responsibility, Small to Medium sized Enterprises, Stakeholders, the mining industry, business ethics, and social entrepreneurship.     

Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in Spain

Despite the economic relevance and distinctiveness of family firms, little attention has been devoted to researching their nature and functioning. Traditionally, family firms have been associated both to positive and negative features in their relationships with the stakeholders. This can be linked to different orientations toward corporate social responsibility. Thus, this research aims to identify the approaches that Spanish family firms maintain about social responsibility, based on the model developed by Quazi and O Brien Journal of Business Ethics 25, 33–51 (2000). An empirical study carried out for 112 Spanish family firms gives support to our initial assumption about these organizations not being a homogeneous group in terms of their orientation towards corporate social responsibility. The differences in perceptions do not seem to be associated to biographical characteristics. These results lead to some relevant academic and practical implications that suggest interesting lines for future research.María de la Cruz Déniz Déniz is professor in the Department of Management at Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (Spain). She received her Ph.D. in the area of Management from that University in 1999. Her current research interests include the study of Corporate Social Performance and the Management of International Business.M^a Katiuska Cabrera Suárez is professor in the Department of Management at Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (Spain). She received her Ph.D. in the area of Management from that University in 1998. Her current research interests include the study of Family Business Behaviour and Management.     

Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors

Four predictors were posited to affect business student attitudes about the social responsibilities of business, also known as corporate social responsibility (CSR). Applying Forsyth’s (1980, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184, 1992, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 461–470) personal moral philosophy model, we found that ethical idealism had a positive relationship with CSR attitudes, and ethical relativism a negative relationship. We also found materialism to be negatively related to CSR attitudes. Spirituality among business students did not significantly predict CSR attitudes. Understanding the relationship between CSR attitudes and the significant predictors has important implications for researchers and teachers in particular.     

Marxism,Business Ethics,and Corporate Social Responsibility

Originally delivered at a conference of Marxist philosophers in China, this article examines some links, and some tensions, between business ethics and the traditional concerns of Marxism. After discussing the emergence of business ethics as an academic discipline, it explores and attempts to answer two Marxist objections that might be brought against the enterprise of business ethics. The first is that business ethics is impossible because capitalism itself tends to produce greedy, overreaching, and unethical business behavior. The second is that business ethics is irrelevant because focusing on the moral or immoral conduct of individual firms or businesspeople distracts one’s attention from the systemic vices of capitalism. I argue, to the contrary, that, far from being impossible, business requires and indeed presupposes ethics and that for those who share Marx’s hope for a better society, nothing could be more relevant than engaging the debate over corporate social responsibility. In line with this, the article concludes by sketching some considerations favoring corporations’ adopting a broader view of their social and moral responsibilities, one that encompasses more than the pursuit of profit.     

The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics

The relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and business ethics (BE) is both a practical and theoretical issue. Unlike the traditional way of clarifying the relationship through identifying and comparing the extant definitions of the two terms, this study addresses and compares CSR and BE from three perspectives (basic concepts, academic fields, and social movements) in two analytical dimensions (in practice and in theory). This study indicates that: The relationship between the concept of CSR and BE is different from either the relationship between CSR as an academic field and BE as another academic field or the relationship between CSR as a movement and BE as another movement; within the relationships of the two concepts, fields and movements, the relationship between them in practice is different from that in theory; and CSR and BE are neither totally independent nor one of mutual inclusion, rather, they have similarities and differences.     

Corporate Social Responsibility as Argument on the Web

This paper critically examines the language drawn on to describe socially responsible activities (CSR) in the context of the corporate web page. I argue that constructions of CSR are made plausible and legitimised according to the context of the expression. The web site is a genre of communication which addresses a broad and discerning audience; hence fractures in the institutionalised nature of argument may be apparent. The focus of this paper is to examine how the rhetoric of CSR is legitimised and to develop a framework of argumentation repertoires that operate in this context