开拓信贷资产证券化的重要意义

信贷资产证券化是指将一组流动性较差的资产经过一定的组合，使这组资产能产生可预计且稳定的现金流收益，再通过一定的中介机构的信用加强，把这些资产的收益权转变为可在金融市场上流动的、信用等级较高的债券型证券的过程。其实质是融资者将被证券化的资产的未来现金收益权和相应的风险转让给投资者，而资产的所有权则不一定完全转让。     

信贷资产证券化:试点中前行

主持人的话:2011年,受稳健货币政策和资本充足率、存贷比等一系列金融监管标准硬约束的影响,商业银行资产扩张规模受到严格限制,商业银行开始寻找在满足监管要求同时实现资产扩张的可行路径。除发行新型理财产品融资之外,开展信贷资产证券化业务的呼声日益高涨。同时,人民银行、银监会等监管层也就信贷资产证券化的继续推进达成一致意见,在未来一段时间资产证券化有望获得快速发展。在当前的经济背景下,扩大信贷资产证券化试点对金融机构开展业务、解决金     

信贷资产证券化面临的问题及破解之策

作为介于直接融资与间接融资模式之间的一种金融创新,信贷资产证券化通过把“间接融资”形成的金融产品在金融市场上出售给参与“直接融资”的投资者,不仅能有效盘活存量、提升银行业有效信贷供给能力,还有利于实现信贷市场与资本市场的对接,提高金融资源配置效率,是对社会融资供给侧的创新和发展.但是,当前我国信贷资产证券化发展仍然较为缓慢,参与主体受限,操作成本偏高,证券化效益较差,配套法规不健全,因此,必须创新监管体制机制,完善证券化产品结构,扩大资产支持证券交易市场.     

我国信贷资产证券化的立法完善

在我国，随着期限较长的贷款在银行贷款业务中所占比重的不断加大，“短存长贷”的矛盾和资金短缺问题日益凸显，这使得银行的经营风险逐渐加大，并在一定条件下可能危及整个金融体系的健康运行。信贷资产证券化作为一种新型的金融工具，其独特的运作机制有利于提高银行的资本充足率，改善其经营现状。但是作为一种“舶来品”，信贷资产证券化作用的有效发挥，离不开独特的市场环境和健全的法律制度的支撑，在中国目前的国情下，由于存在着诸多的法律障碍，信贷资产证券化的推行必将是一个长期、渐进的过程。因此，在完善信贷资产证券化立法的过程中，我们任重而道远。     

信贷资产证券化走向常态

国庆节前,中国农业发展银行的12．74亿元“发元信贷资产证券”在京成功发行。这是农发行首次发行信贷资产支持证券,也是国务院决定进一步扩大信贷资产证券化试点以来又一次涉足这一领域。     

浅析商业银行信贷资产证券化

我国银行业信贷资产数额巨大,截至2014年9月末,银行业金融机构信贷贷款余额达到84.74万亿元。然而预计到2014年底,我国银行业信贷资产证券化规模才达到5000亿,规模的悬殊对比说明我国开展信贷资产证券化空间巨大,而且势在必行。本文介绍了信贷资产化的基本理论,分析我国信贷资产证券化运作机制存在的问题,并对我国商业银行信贷资产证券化的发展提出合理化建议。     

浅析商业银行信贷资产证券化

我国银行业信贷资产数额巨大,截至2014年9月末,银行业金融机构信贷贷款余额达到84.74万亿元。然而预计到2014年底,我国银行业信贷资产证券化规模才达到5000亿,规模的悬殊对比说明我国开展信贷资产证券化空间巨大,而且势在必行。本文介绍了信贷资产化的基本理论,分析我国信贷资产证券化运作机制存在的问题,并对我国商业银行信贷资产证券化的发展提出合理化建议。     

国有商业银行信贷资产证券化的实践与展望

2005年12月,国家开发银行第一期42 亿元开元信贷资产支持证券和中国建设银行建元2005-1期30亿元个人住房抵押贷款证券化信托资产支持证券在银行间债券市场成功发行,标志着我国信贷资     

资产证券化案例分析——开元信贷资产支持证券案例

一、开元证券发行背景、发行方式 资产证券化在美国及其他发达国家已经发展为成熟的金融衍生品的同时，我国的资产证券化市场仍然是一片空白。虽然相关的讨论在国内理论界已经进行了很长一段时间，但是真正的破冰之行还是从2005年底国家开发银行（以下简称“国开行”）的开元信贷资产支持证券发行开始的。     

信贷资产证券化试点的实践和发展

2012年9月7日,国家开发银行在国际金融危机以后首单成功试点发行了101.7亿元信贷资产支持证券,标志着我国信贷资产证券化试点进入了有序稳步发展的新时期我国信贷资产证券化试点从2005年3月启动,到现在已经开展了七年多。经过各方面的共同努力,     

A preliminary look at gains from asset securitization

This paper conducts tests of stockholder and bondholder wealth changes upon the securitization of non-government guaranteed assets for 236 transactions during the years 1991–1996. It finds that securitization is significantly wealth creating for stockholders, adding ∼5% per transaction to the excess returns of the stock. It finds, on a subsample of 137 transactions, that securitization is not wealth destroying for bondholders, adding an insignificant 0.21% to bondholders wealth. The effects on stockholders are larger for manufacturers than for banks and finance companies. Securitizations from corporations with poorer credit standing are subject to larger gains for asset sellers. We interpret these findings to mean that, for the frequent securitizers that form most of the observations in our sample, a comparative advantage in asset origination and servicing rather than wealth appropriation from bond holders explains the gains from securitization.     

资本市场、资产证券化与我国银行经营

近年来,无论是发达国家,还是发展中国家,资本市场在其国民经济的重要地位正日益显现.资本市场作为要素市场的重要部分,是配置社会资源的重要场所,其从来没有像现在这样引入瞩目.从全球范围来看,目前世界金融体系主要分为银行主导型金融体系和市场主导型金融体系,无论是以资本市场为主导的英美,还是以银行主导的德日,它们都有一个共同的特点,那就是它们的资本市场在近几年都得到了飞速的发展.     

把握好资产证券化和新三板中的融资机会

在前不久举办的“第八届中国C F O年会暨2014中国C F O年度人物颁奖典礼”上，围绕着新常态下资本市场的创新融资方式，众专家对资产证券化和新三板发表了看法并介绍了各自的实践活动，这些专家是北京建筑设计研究院CFO苗润生、信达投资计划财务部总经理吕飞、天地科技CFO宋家兴、中德环保CFO王久华、上交所首席经济学家胡汝银。     

A study on risk retention regulation in asset securitization process

We study the impacts of the recently proposed risk retention regulation for asset securitization, i.e. the issuer has to retain a certain proportion of securitized assets. We also consider the frequently discussed measure to require the issuer disclose certain information of the securitized assets. In a dynamic model with asymmetric information between a risk-averse originating bank and a continuum of risk-averse investors, we find that it is impossible for a flat-rate retention requirement to be optimal for all asset types. Although both risk retention and information disclosure regulations are effective in reducing investors’ informational loss, neither can unconditionally enhance social welfare upon the unregulated case. For both measures, there are associated regulatory cost: risk retention regulation aggravates adverse selection problem because it undermines the channel of informational revelation by the choice of securitization intensity, and information disclosure requirement incurs a signalling cost by distorting banks’ securitization intensity in sending signals. Under an appropriate set of conditions we find that information disclosure requirement complements risk retention regulation when investors are sufficiently risk averse.     

美国次贷危机对中国资产证券化业务的影响及建议

美国次按危机爆发至今,已给美国以及全球金融市场带来了巨大的冲击。面对中国资产证券化发展方向的探讨,文章通过分析美国次贷危机的成因、中国证券化业务发展的现状,对比出美国次贷与中国已开展的证券化业务的本质区别,指出我们应从美国次贷危机中吸取教训,加强业务风险的防范,充分利用我国此项业务开展的后发优势,适当加快试点的步伐。     

Investment and asset securitization with an option‐for‐guarantee swap

This article addresses the investment and financing decisions of entrepreneurs entering into option‐for‐guarantee swaps (OGSs). OGSs increase investment option value significantly. Entrepreneurs initially accelerate their investments and then postpone them as funding gaps grow. Guarantee costs increase with project risks when the funding gap is sufficiently small or large, but the opposite holds true otherwise. Investments are postponed when project risks, effective tax rates, or bankruptcy costs increase. Surprisingly, the higher the project risk, the more the entrepreneur will borrow, with a much higher leverage than predicted by classic models. Entrepreneurs can use OGSs to securitize their assets.     

Consumption-based capital asset pricing models: issues and controversies

This paper discusses the issues and controversies surrounding consumption-based capital asset pricing models (CCAPMs). While CCAPMs provide a chance to explain the phenomena observed in stock markets, their viability is jeopardized owing to the weak predictability of the equity premium and risk-free rate puzzles. Even given market frictions and market incompleteness, CCAPMs must test their validity constantly in the face of the formidable challenges of rival models. Measurement error with respect to time aggregation is also regarded as a major threat, causing the low volatility of consumption and eventually resulting in chaining itself to weak return predictability. In addition, the dual choice problem of portfolio and consumption rooted in CCAPMs guides us into how investors accumulate wealth through the financial market to reach the zenith of expected utility. This paper offers insights as well as understanding into the behavior of an agent and market phenomena in the context of a consumption-based economy.     

资产证券化助力公益小贷服务“三农”

2014年12月9日,中和农信2014年第一期公益小额贷款资产支持专项计划(简称:专项计划)成功设立,发行总额为人民币五亿元,由中信证券作为计划管理人及推广机构。这是证监会公布《证券公司及基金管理公司子公司资产证券化业务管理规定》的首单交易所证券化产品,也是中国国内市场首单公益贷款证券化项目,此次专项计划的成功发行,也为市场化解决"三农"问题找到了一条行之有效的新路