首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   109篇
  免费   13篇
财政金融   18篇
工业经济   5篇
计划管理   27篇
经济学   31篇
贸易经济   32篇
农业经济   2篇
经济概况   2篇
邮电经济   5篇
  2023年   1篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   3篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   7篇
  2017年   9篇
  2016年   10篇
  2015年   4篇
  2014年   12篇
  2013年   10篇
  2012年   8篇
  2011年   7篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   6篇
  2007年   4篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   6篇
  2004年   1篇
  2003年   3篇
  2002年   4篇
  2001年   5篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1997年   1篇
  1988年   1篇
  1986年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1977年   1篇
  1971年   1篇
排序方式: 共有122条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
121.
When studying individuals, when is the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods better than just one method alone? Whereas the debate in macro-level research, such as in political science about comparing nations, has made progress in identifying meaningful logics for a combination of methods, it is yet unclear how these logics can be applied to the study of individuals. Individual-level dynamics are in tendency less inert than those of nations or organisations. Therefore, a combination of methods is more difficult to justify in individual-level analysis since differences in measurement results could be due to changes in the dynamics rather than due to the application of different techniques. In contrast, the assumption of unit homogeneity seems to be more easily met for individuals than for countries or other higher-level aggregates, facilitating a comparison of like and like. First, this article presents a compilation of conditions scattered across the literature for the analysis of individuals, according to which a mixed-method is preferable to a single-method approach. Second, the application of these conditions is illustrated with an analysis of the impact of intergenerational relationships on welfare state attitudes in Germany on the basis of survey and focus group data.  相似文献   
122.
We use a highly disaggregated panel of macro data and minimum wages at the county level to investigate the processes behind minimum wage adjustments in China. Relying on random effects models, spatial econometrics techniques, and multilevel analyses, we document that a comparatively small number of economic variables – including the local price level and GDP per capita – are important determinants of minimum wage rates. Interactions between adjacent counties and counties of the same administrative type, and centralized mechanisms, particularly at the provincial level, also play an important role in explaining the variance in minimum wage rates across counties. Finally, we show that China's provinces are the key players for setting minimum wage rates and that, when they do so, they are not uniform in the way they weigh different economic variables.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号