Policy implications of research on non-GAAP reporting

Over the past two decades, the regulatory landscape for non-GAAP reporting has evolved significantly. Despite a temporary decline in the frequency of non-GAAP reporting following Regulation G, the incidence of non-GAAP disclosure has continued to increase steadily, leading to a current all-time high in reporting activity. This proliferation of non-GAAP disclosure has captured the attention of standard setters and regulators in recent years. This paper provides an academic perspective on policy implications for both regulation and standard setting. We contend that current Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) of the SEC staff may perhaps have gone too far in restricting certain types of non-GAAP disclosures. As a result, we advocate a slight relaxation of the current enforcement of Regulation G. We agree with FASB proposals for greater disaggregation in the income statement to allow for more transparency in non-GAAP reporting. Finally, we believe the PCAOB should consider requiring auditors to take a more direct role with respect to non-GAAP disclosures.     

Non-GAAP reporting following debt covenant violations

Review of Accounting Studies - We investigate whether firms change their non-GAAP reporting practices after debt covenant violations. We find that the likelihood that a firm will disclose non-GAAP...     

The Relation Between Investor Uncertainty and Market Reactions to Earnings Announcements: Evidence from the Property‐Casualty Insurance Industry in the USA

Abstract:   This paper investigates the relationship between investor uncertainty, gauged by properties of analysts' forecasts, and the stock market response to earnings. We find that uncertainty is best characterized by a comprehensive measure recently proposed by Barron, Kim, Lim and Stevens (1998) , BKLS. The BKLS measure is related to uncertainty‐inducing events, as well as factors that affect the difficulty faced by analysts in forecasting earnings. We conclude that, first, pre‐disclosure uncertainty is a significant determinant of the price reaction to the earnings release, and second, BKLS is a more comprehensive measure of uncertainty than simple dispersion.     

Corporate venture capital in Germany: A comparative analysis of 2000 and 2003

Established corporations are often at a disadvantage vis à vis technology-based entrepreneurial firms when it comes to generating and adapting to radical technological and business-model innovation. Consequently, industrial corporations increasingly wanted to participate in the financial or strategic success of start-ups. The tool of choice for many corporations was Corporate Venture Capital (CVC). CVC had already seen two waves of popularity in the USA when it was introduced in Germany in the early 1990s. This development is often assumed to have come to a halt in 2001, when so-called ‘New Economy’ spiraled into decline.This paper analyzes central attributes of strategy, investment and organization of the CVC units active in Germany in 2000 and 2003. We find evidence for a continuation of strong CVC activity in Germany. We differentiate between CVC units that were a) active at both points in time, i.e. ‘survivors’ b) those that have closed down since 2000, i.e. ‘losers’ and c) those that were founded after 2000, ‘new entrants’. The comparison of the characteristics allows us to make inferences for the use of CVC.     

Output and expected returns

This paper shows for 1929–2003 U.S. data and also for international G-7 data that the ratio of share prices to GDP tracks a large fraction of the variation over time in expected returns on the aggregate stock market, capturing more of that variation than do price–earnings and price–dividend ratios and often also providing additional information about excess returns. The price–output ratio tracks long-term U.S. cumulative stock returns almost as well as the cay-ratio of Lettau and Ludvigson [2001a. Journal of Finance 56, 815–849, 2005. Journal of Financial Economics 76, 583–626], although the cay-ratio tracks variation in U.S. excess returns better. The price–output ratio, however, involves no parameter estimation and is easily constructed for non-U.S. countries.     

ON THE BIASES IN FOREIGN TRADE INDICES*

Starting out from the observation that both imports and exports may be viewed as the difference between domestic consumption (use) and production, static standard theory of biases in consumption and production indices is brought to bear upon trade indices: Laspeyres tends to overrate when applied to imports and to underrate when applied to exports; for Paasche, the opposite holds true. Hence, terms of trade tend to be underrated (exaggerated) when based upon Laspeyres (Paasche) price indices. The problem of extending these conclusions to the case of changes in production frontiers and preference maps is discussed. When homotheticity is absent, correlation between price and quantity relatives may upset the simple conclusions. This is of special importance in the large-country situation. Dynamics further complicate the situation. A cobweb mechanism in exports may thus reverse the static results.     

Modelling alternative residential peak-load electricity rate structures

We specify a model of consumer behavior that permits the simultaneous estimation of effects of time-of-use rates having a demand charge, differential energy charges, and any combination of such charges. The model employs a flexible functional form and thus does not impose restrictions on substitution possibilities among types of usage. We estimate the model using data from the Wisconsin Residential Electricity Pricing Experiment for eight system peak days. The most surprising finding of our empirical application is that the two types of time-of-use rates employed in the Wisconsin experiment have similar effects on patterns of household electricity usage.