Valuation Relevance of Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Operating Income: The Effects of Regulatory Climates and Deregulation

This study considers the valuation relevance allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC), operating income (OI), and their innovations across regulatory climates and regulatory reforms. Valuation relevance is assessed by examining the coefficients and R ²s from the regressions of returns on AFUDC, OI, and their innovations. Regulatory climate is predicted to affect valuation relevance of earnings components on the premise that different regulatory regimes enact and enforce policies that differently affect (1) the uncertainty of future earnings, (2) the recovery of deferred assets, and (3) the sustainability of earnings innovations. In an extended analysis, indicators of rate-base valuation method and leverage are added as control variables to isolate their mediating effects on returns for electric utilities. Additional analysis considers the effects of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 1992 on the valuation of earnings components. The results reveal that AFUDC and OI are valued differently relative to each other and across regulatory climates. The results also show a significant decline in the explanatory power of earnings components after the passage of the EPAct in 1992. Rate-base valuation method has no discernible effects on returns for the utilities. On the other hand, the effect of leverage on returns for the utilities is reliably negative.     

Accounting Information and CEO Compensation: The Role of Cash Flow from Operations in the Presence of Earnings*

We examine the role of cash flow from operations (CFO) in chief executive officer (CEO) cash compensation. We predict that CFO is contract‐relevant in the presence of earnings, and more so when (1) the quality of earnings relative to the quality of CFO as a measure of performance is low and (2) the need for CFO as a financing source is high. Our analysis is motivated principally by normative arguments and anecdotes from financial disclosures linking CFO to managerial effort and contracts, notwithstanding the traditional role of earnings in performance measurement. We find that the weight of CFO in the compensation model is positive and significant in the presence of earnings and stock returns. We also find that the relative quality of CFO compared with that of earnings has a positive (negative) impact on the weight of CFO (earnings). We further find that the relative weight of CFO is enhanced substantially when enterprise activities crucially depend on internally generated cash flow. These findings are unaltered when we include CEO age, firm size, and risk in the model and allow the coefficients to vary across industries.     

The Adjustment Process of Accruals: Empirical Evidence and Implication for Accrual Research

This study analyzes the intertemporal behavior of accruals and uses the results to offer some perspectives on models of accruals. Separate adjustment rates are estimated for total and managed accruals and further compared to assess the influence of managers on accrual adjustment. Analysis is further performed to test whether there is an industry-specific adjustment rate for either total or managed accruals. The results show that both the total and managed accruals follow a partial adjustment process rather than a pure-adjustment or random-walk process. Nonetheless, managed accruals exhibit longer adjustment length than total accruals in each industry sample. In addition, total and managed accruals appear to follow certain adjustment patterns that are industry-specific, consistent with the view that common industry practices and norms lead to benchmark adjustment rates to which industry firms conform. Based on the results showing that accruals exhibit lagged and industry-specific adjustments, an extension of the modified Jones model is proposed. The extended model incorporates lagged accruals and an industry accrual index in an attempt to exploit the lagged-adjustment and industry effects and, in that context, improve the temporal classification of accrual innovations. Simple tests show that the extended model achieves substantial improvements in specification over the modified Jones model.     

Social Investment through Community Enterprise: The Case of Multinational Corporations Involvement in the Development of Nigerian Water Resources

This paper examines the different mechanisms used by multinational corporations (MNCs) in Nigeria seeking to make long-term social investments by meeting the critical challenge of improving water provision. Community enterprise – an increasingly common form of social enterprise, which pursues charitable objectives through business activities – may be the most effective mechanism for building local capacity in a sustainable and accountable way. Traditionally, social investments by MNCs have involved either donations to a charity, which then assumes responsibility for delivering social outcomes, or direct management of social investment in-house. These approaches have been criticized, however, for their limited contribution to local capacity building, their focus on short-term outcomes, and the restricted role that they afford to communities. Partnering with community enterprise, provided there is sufficient local capacity to support it, is the most effective mode of governance through which MNCs can manage social investments in developing countries. Dr. Emeka Nwankwo is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Aquada Development Corporation, an infrastructure and technology development firm based in Nigeria. Nelson Phillips is the Professor of Strategy and Organizational Behavior at the Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London. Paul Tracey is a Lecturer in Enterprise at the Centre for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.