Tourism and climate change: An international perspective

This paper addresses the implications of climate change for tourism through a survey of national tourism and meteorological organisations. While climate change may have far‐reaching consequences for tourism, it is shown that while most respondents felt that climate is important to their country's tourism industry, very few were aware of climate change research specifically related to tourism. Almost half felt climate change is or could become a significant issue in their country but almost no climate change publications with direct bearing on tourism are available. It is concluded that climate is an important determinant of tourism, and that global climate change may create new challenges, and opportunities, for the tourism industry. However, more awareness, research, and policy analysis are necessary to reduce uncertainties, further understanding, assess implications and enable the tourism industry to adapt to changing circumstances.     

Cognition of disaster risk in a tourism community: an agricultural heritage system perspective

Cognition of risk is the first step in reducing disaster damage and losses. In this study, risk cognition in the Hani Rice Terraces, the core tourism attraction in Yuanyang County, Honghe Prefecture, Yunnan, China, is analyzed based on field survey and participatory geographic information system (GIS). The results show that tourism communities have cognition of risk; are more sensitive to hazards (especially drought); have more severe potential damage and losses from hazards; and also have more enthusiasm to adapt to disaster risk, when compared with a non-tourism community. On disaster vulnerability maps, the tourism communities identified the unique “Forest – Village – Terrace - River” landscape while the non-tourism community only recognized the terrace and the village as the main elements affected by hazard. Also, the tourism communities had deeper understandings of drought, flash floods and landslide disaster risks. A conceptual model based on “Pressure – State – Response” relationships is put forward to explore the situation in which, in the tourism community, terraces have a greater variety of functions and enhanced values resulting in the spatial expansion of hazard effects.     

Properties that Sell at or above Listing Price: Strategic Pricing,Better Broker or Just Dumb Luck?

The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics - A surprisingly large number of houses sell above listing prices in a wide range of markets and in all market conditions. The question is: why do...     

The effect of rankings on honesty in budget reporting

We conduct an experiment to investigate the effect of rankings, which are pervasive in practice, on the honesty of managers’ budget reports, which is important for sound decision making in organizations. Participants in our experiment are ranked in one of four ways: (1) firm profit, (2) own compensation, (3) both firm profit and own compensation, and (4) randomly, which serves as our baseline condition. None of the rankings affect participants’ remuneration. Compared to our baseline (random rankings) setting, where participants indeed exhibit honesty concerns, we find that rankings based on firm profit significantly increase honesty and that rankings based on own compensation significantly decrease honesty. Participants who received both rankings were significantly more honest than participants in the own compensation rankings condition. We did not, however, find significant differences in honesty between the both rankings and firm profit rankings conditions. As such, participants in the both rankings condition seemed to focus more on the firm profit metric than on the financially congruent own compensation metric. We also find that our results are stable across periods, suggesting that the effects of rankings neither increased nor dissipated over time. We discuss the contributions of our study and concomitant findings to accounting research and practice.     

General Price-level Adjustment: Some Properties of the Edwards and Bell Method

The method of general price level adjustment proposed by Edwards and Bell differs from the traditional CPP method, insofar as it enables historical cost profit to be reconciled with real accounting income (CPP profit) by two steps within a single simple statement. Edwards and Bell's contribution is clarified in this paper, by proving rigorously the two theorems which underlie their method of applying general price level adjustment to historical cost. A numerical example is used to illustrate pure historical cost, traditional CPP, Edwards and Bell general price level adjustment, and Ijiri's dual, which is found to contain similar information to the Edwards and Bell system. This is followed by a discussion of Edwards and Bell's preferred method of price level adjustment to a replacement cost base. This method of adjustment, applied to a current cost base, underlay FAS33 as modified by FAS82 in the USA. Finally, Edwards and Bell's historical cost base is compared with a recent British proposal for a one-line adjustment to capture the effects of inflation on historical cost profit. The simplicity of the latter proposal lies in the form rather than the substance of the information presented.