全文获取类型
收费全文 | 465篇 |
免费 | 17篇 |
专业分类
财政金融 | 150篇 |
工业经济 | 25篇 |
计划管理 | 65篇 |
经济学 | 77篇 |
综合类 | 8篇 |
旅游经济 | 8篇 |
贸易经济 | 83篇 |
农业经济 | 28篇 |
经济概况 | 38篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 2篇 |
2023年 | 6篇 |
2022年 | 5篇 |
2021年 | 3篇 |
2020年 | 7篇 |
2019年 | 14篇 |
2018年 | 12篇 |
2017年 | 11篇 |
2016年 | 12篇 |
2015年 | 6篇 |
2014年 | 19篇 |
2013年 | 46篇 |
2012年 | 19篇 |
2011年 | 24篇 |
2010年 | 20篇 |
2009年 | 19篇 |
2008年 | 21篇 |
2007年 | 23篇 |
2006年 | 20篇 |
2005年 | 12篇 |
2004年 | 15篇 |
2003年 | 14篇 |
2002年 | 15篇 |
2001年 | 9篇 |
2000年 | 13篇 |
1999年 | 14篇 |
1998年 | 9篇 |
1997年 | 6篇 |
1996年 | 11篇 |
1995年 | 12篇 |
1994年 | 11篇 |
1993年 | 3篇 |
1992年 | 5篇 |
1991年 | 8篇 |
1990年 | 7篇 |
1989年 | 3篇 |
1988年 | 1篇 |
1986年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 4篇 |
1984年 | 1篇 |
1983年 | 4篇 |
1982年 | 5篇 |
1981年 | 6篇 |
1980年 | 3篇 |
1976年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有482条查询结果,搜索用时 343 毫秒
481.
Y. J. Jeff Qiu 《The Rand journal of economics》2023,54(1):135-164
Funding is important for research. However, research funding may suffer from the Matthew effect: the more researchers already have, the more they will be given. I develop an empirical framework to study how the National Institutes of Health (NIH) could allocate funding in a dynamically optimal manner by balancing funds between young and veteran principal investigators (PIs). I find that the discount factor that rationalizes NIH's funding behavior is about 0.75, implying it may underfund young PIs. Moreover, a temporary funding cut would have long-lasting effects on overall research output through its adverse impact on investment in young PIs. 相似文献
482.
David J. Cooper Jeff Everett Darlene Himick Daniela Senkl 《Accounting Perspectives》2023,22(2):215-234
This paper expands on a letter recently submitted by a group of Canadian business academics to the Independent Review Committee on Standard Setting in Canada (IRCSSC) in response to the committee's proposed Canadian Sustainability Standards Board. We highlight sections of the IRCSSC's Consultation Paper that we find problematic and draw on accounting and other research to explain why it fails to live up to its potential. Chief among the problems we identify is that the IRCSSC appears to be wedded to the same narrow, investor-based focus promoted by the International Sustainability Standard Board. We also draw attention to the rushed nature of the process, its exclusion of lay experts, the IRCSSC's ambiguous use of the term public interest, and its inattention to alternative understandings of value and the environment (including the people within it). Finally, we problematize the IRCSSC's sidestepping of the issues of power, culture, and conflict; its neglect of monitoring and enforcement; and its surprising disregard of the Global Reporting Initiative. Along with a number of suggestions for improving the process and its outcome, this paper also contributes to ongoing debates on standard setting and the question of whether accounting is currently equipped to provide the necessary tools for sustainability reporting. 相似文献