Religious belief and international business negotiations: Does faith influence negotiator behaviour?

Religious observance is widespread and continues to influence managerial behaviour in many parts of the world. However, its role in international business negotiations has not received much scholarly attention. This study explores some of the key ways in which religious belief shapes negotiation behaviour. Focusing specifically on the Islamic context, and drawing on interviews with 27 religiously observant Muslim managers in Malaysia, the study found that commitment to a common religion among negotiators positively influenced certain components of the negotiation process through, for example, the use of religious/emotional appeal, which emphasised their ‘spiritual camaraderie’. In some instances, however, we observed something of a paradox, whereby differing religious beliefs among negotiating counterparts were claimed to actually enhance, rather than hinder, negotiations.     

Enhancing Student Competency and Employability in International Business Through Master’s Dissertations

A core component of International Business (IB) postgraduate programs around the world is the master’s dissertation, which requires students to produce a written document, typically around 20,000 words in length, based on empirical research. While the dissertation is given considerable importance in such programs, often accounting for more than a quarter of a candidate’s final grade, the effectiveness of the dissertation in delivering outcomes remains largely unknown. This article addresses this shortcoming by providing an empirical understanding of the perceived usefulness and value of master’s-level dissertations and evaluating their impact on the personal and intellectual development of students. Findings demonstrate the unique ability of the dissertation to enhance student employability, both for scientifically interested and deep learners as well as for functional learners.     

Does “skin in the game” reduce risk taking? Leverage,liability and the long-run consequences of new deal banking reforms

This essay examines how the Banking Acts of the 1933 and 1935 and related New Deal legislation influenced risk taking in the financial sector of the U.S. economy. The analysis focuses on contingent liability of bank owners for losses incurred by their firms and how the elimination of this liability influenced leverage and lending by commercial banks. Using a new panel data set, we find contingent liability reduced risk taking. In states with contingent liability, banks used less leverage and converted each dollar of capital into fewer loans, and thus could survive larger loan losses (as a fraction of their portfolio) than banks in limited liability states. In states with limited liability, banks took on more leverage and risk, particularly in states that required banks with limited liability to join the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In the long run, the New Deal replaced a regime of contingent liability with deposit insurance, stricter balance sheet regulation, and increased capital requirements, shifting the onus of risk management from bankers to state and federal regulators.     

Religion, longevity, and cooperation: The case of the craft guild

When the mortality rate is high, repeated interaction alone may not sustain cooperation, and religion may play an important role in shaping economic institutions. This insight explains why during the fourteenth century, when plagues decimated populations and the church promoted the doctrine of purgatory, guilds that bundled together religious and occupational activities dominated manufacturing and commerce. During the sixteenth century, the disease environment eased, and the Reformation dispelled the doctrine of purgatory, necessitating the development of new methods of organizing industry. The logic underlying this conclusion has implications for the study of institutions, economics, and religion throughout history and in the developing world today.     

Stock-Price Effects of Internet Buy-Sell Recommendations: The Motley Fool Case

The Motley Fool has attracted significant notoriety for stock market buy‐sell advice on the Internet. Across five different investment portfolios, Motley Fool buy recommendations appear to generate an average 1.62% rise in stock prices on the announcement day (0), and 2.40% returns over the announcement period (?1, +1). Sell recommendations seem to cause a ?1.49% announcement day return, and a ?3.33% announcement period return. Small cap growth stock buy recommendations for The Motley Fool's flagship Rule Breaker Portfolio are associated with returns of 3.66% on the announcement day, and a 6.15% return over the announcement period. These findings suggest herd‐like behavior among Internet investors, and that such announcements are more newsworthy than second‐hand buy‐sell recommendations published in traditional print and electronic media.     

Training for business start-up in Scotland — the gender dimension

This paper looks at two examples of business start-up training in Scotland which have specifically targeted women, both younger women entering the labour market for the first time and older women who are either unemployed or returning to the labour market after raising a family. We argue that women face a double disadvantage in trying to start up and run their own business. Traditionally women have not been seen as business owners and are under represented in the small business sector. Secondly women perform a dual role in that they are almost always responsible for domestic and family concerns, whether they are economically active or not. We recognise that “gender constraints” exist and discuss the training programmes we have developed which in their style, content and timing set out to meet the special needs of women contemplating self employment.     

The urban programme what has it achieved?

On the 13th November a one day seminar on the Urban Programme was held by the London Economic Policy Unit (LEPU) at the Polytechnic of the South Bank. This paper provides a short summary of the issues raised.     

A short-run monetary model of exchange rate determination: Stability tests and forecasting

The paper develops a short-run econometric monetary model of exchange rate determination. The model assumes a conventional money demand function, markets which are linked by interest arbitrage, adaptive expectations formation, and parameters which are stable over time. One-period-ahead forecasts of the mark/pound rate generated by the model compare favorably with naive model forecasts using monthly data. Stability tests provided evidence of parameter instability in 1976 but correction for it did not improve forecasting accuracy. The inability of monetary models to forecast accurately may be due to the underlying model assumptions rather than parameter instability.     

AN EXPLORATION INTO BANKRUPTCY DISCRIMINANT MODEL SENSITIVITY

Prediction has been a central theme in much of the accounting research and theory construction and verification over the past decade. Largely ignored in such studies has been consideration of the statistical properties of accounting measures, particularly as related to the effects of those properties on the signals from prediction models that use accounting measures as inputs. This study was designed to provide preliminary insight into the magnitude of the effects of this omission, and a bankruptcy prediction model was selected to facilitate the analysis. Results indicate that the linear discriminant model (as applied to prediction of failure) is sensitive to departures of inputdata distributions from multivariate normal.