An input approach to European comparative advantage in advanced products: A study with special emphasis on The Netherlands

Zusammenfassung Eine Input-orientierte Untersuchung der komparativen Vorteile Europas bei fortgeschrittenen Erzeugnissen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Niederlande.- Die Autoren zeigen, da\ die EG-L?nder - und besonders die Niederlande - im Laufe der siebziger Jahre den Vorsprung verringerten, den die Vereinigten Staaten ihnen gegenüber in der Verfügbarkeit von Humankapital hatten, das mittelfristig ein wichtiger Produktionsfaktor für eine solide Wettbewerbsposition der fortgeschrittenen Sektoren ist. Dagegen wurde auf dem Gebiet der Forschung und Entwicklung, das für die langfristige Wettbewerbsposition entscheidend ist, der Vorsprung Japans vor den USA und den EG-L?ndern (und besonders vor den Niederlanden) in den siebziger Jahren sogar noch gr?\er. Das sollte bedacht werden, wenn in der EG und vor allem in den Niederlanden z. B. eine Industriepolitik entworfen wird.

---

Résumé Une approche d’input des avantages comparatifs européens en biens avancés: Une étude particulièrement sur les Pays Bas. - Les auteurs démontrent que pendant les années soixante-dix les pays CE - et particulièrement les Pays Bas - mitigaient l’avantage des E.U. concernant la disponibilité du capital humain comme facteur essentiel de production pour une solide position compétitive à moyen terme. Regardant recherche et développement comme facteurs essentiels pour la position compétitive à long terme, cependant, l’avance de Japon vis-à-vis les E.U. et les pays CE - et particulièrement les Pays Bas - même s’accr?t dans les années soixante-dix. Ce développement doit être considéré si l’on formule par example des politiques industrielles dans la CE et particulièrement aux Pays Bas.

---

Resumen Los insumos en las ventajas comparativas de Europa en productos sofisticados: Un estudio con el énfasis en los Países Bajos. - Los autores demuestran que en los aftos 70 los paises de la CEE, particularmente los Países Bajos, lograron reducir la ventaja que les Uevan los EEUU en cuanto a la dotación con capital humano, que es un factor de producción esencial para llegar an una posición de competencia sólida en el mercado de productos avanzados. En investigación y desarrollo, que constituye un factor crucial para la posición competitiva de largo plazo en este campo, empero, la ventaja que le lleva el Japón a los EEUU y a la CEE y, particularmente, a los Países Bajos llegó a aumentar en los a?os 70. Esto debería ser tomado en cuenta cuando se formulen, por ejemplo, políticas industriales en la CEE y en los Países Bajos en particular.

     

Collaboration,motivation, and the size of organizations

We present an analytical model of an organization that offers operational drivers of limits on team size. The model trades off benefits from collaborative problem solving against the disadvantages of diminishing motivation when groups get large. Collaboration is represented as parallel employee activity combined with frequent sharing of partial information, with a resulting superlinear performance increase over team size. Motivation is modeled by team members periodically setting an effort level either to contribute to the best of their ability or to “cruise”; at the minimum level not recognizable as shirking. Each individual decision is limited by bounded rationality based on team rewards, the time horizon of team interaction, and individual expectations about colleagues’ behavior. The decision collapses to a simple “barrier rule”;. Work hard when a certain “barrier percentage”; of team members work hard, and otherwise shirk. The influence of team size on this barrier percentage depends on the extent of benefits from collaboration: As long as performance increases quadratically with team size, the increased benefits resulting from collaboration exactly balance the temptation to shirk, with the barrier percentage approaching a fixed limit for large team sizes. As soon as the performance increase slows to anything less than quadratic, shirking eventually sets in and limits the possible size of the team. This implies that cooperation is sustainable in large organizational units, provided the problem‐solving processes used are powerful enough to ensure sufficient performance increases. Thus, effective problem‐solving methods are of double value, improving direct productivity and mitigating the social dilemma from team production. A manager should enlarge his or her organization up to the minimum of the limit set by the cooperation barrier and the exogenous performance limit.     

THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EFFORT, ORGANIZATION, AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN CHINESE FACTORIES

Production reports from a set of Chinese factories reveal very rapid productivity growth from 1980 to 1991. To understand the underlying factors, the effects of work effort and labor organization are separated from the productivity estimates. Data analysis reveals that these two effects jointly explain most of the measured productivity growth during this period. This result suggests that (1) very substantial productivity growth can be realized for economies in the take-off stage even without substantial pure technological advancement, and (2) in reforming the Chinese state factories, there will have to be a more difficult second stage to confront their technological backwardness.     

TECHNICAL NOTE : THE VARIABLE FINANCIAL INDICATOR IRR AND THE CONSTANT ECONOMIC INDICATOR NPV

The IRR (internal rate of return) and the NPV (net present value) are the two most common and important indicators in investment decisions. These two indicators, however, have intrinsic differences between one another. The IRR is a financial indicator and the NPV an economic indicator of a capital investment. The former gives the private investor's point of view and the latter the society's point of view. The value of ERR varies with the change of Financial arrangement of an investment. The NPV, however, does not but remains constant no matter how the financial arrangement changes. This paper uses an illustrative example to show their intrinsic differences and then describes a mathematical proof to substantiate the different natures of IRR and NPV.     

Are Parental Characteristics Important for Child Survival? The Case of Vietnam

While remaining one of the poorest countries in the world, Vietnam's infant and child mortality rates have been much lower than those observed for countries with similar or even higher levels of real income per capita. The paper investigates the role of parents' characteristics in affecting survival of their children, using a logistic discrete-time model and data from the Vietnam Demographic and Health Survey 1988 . It is found that infant mortality is significantly higher for children of mothers with no formal education. However, parents' other socioeconomic characteristics, including mothers attaining levels of education higher than the primary level, are not important for explaining differences in child survival. There is some evidence that children of higher orders of birth face higher risk. Results on the effects of maternal education diverge from findings for other countries, but can perhaps be explained by the country's distinctive features.