Bringing computer power to the consumer market

Firms in m a y industrial sectors are seeking to capitalize on the promise of new information technology to generate new consumer products which can gain substantial markets. Where these are improved versions of familiar products, the marketing task is relatively easy, but many of the new product opportunities involve radically new types of consumer good and/or service. Drawing on studies of efforts to establish such radical innovations, this paper examines the problems that are confornted in attempting to define what sort of product is actually being created and how it may fit into consume life-styles. Though there is considerable discussion of these topics in industrial circles, it appears that until late stages of product development, little serious analysis of social issues is undertaken— if at all. Furthemore, such discussio of the nature and use of products are more intended to mobilize the group of actors who are needed to support the innovation than to feed substantial information about possible user reqquirements into the design process. The design process is much more liable to invorporate ideas derived from analysis of technological trends and the use of products in professional applications, than information derived from social scienc or market research.     

The causal analysis of contingency tables: A return to first principles

Given the undoubtedly major advances in the analysis of contingency tables which have been achieved over the past ten years or so (see for example, Fienberg, 1980; Upton, 1978; Everitt, 1977; Haberman, 1978, 1979), it might seem rather unnecessary to want to return to first princples again. However, the need arises precisely because of these advances; for progress in the specifically causal analysis of contingency tables has not matched the other advances at all. Whilst Fienberg devoted a chapter to causal analysis, he made it clear that he views “the assignment of numerical values [to the arrows in a path diagram] as problematic, and [he] would limit [the analysis] to an indication of sign for causal relationships, in a fashion similar to that described by Blalock (1964)” (Fienberg, 1980, pp. 91–92). Considering how far quantitative-variable causal analysis has developed since Blalock (1964), it becomes clear that the causal analysis of qualitative data is still at a rather primitive stage. Indeed, Haberman (1978, 1979), in his two-volume survey of the analysis of qualitative data, does not mention it at all. The problem, I believe, is that log-linear and logit methodology are not particularly suited to the logic of causality in contingency tables. In order to derive a suitable method, it is necessary to uncover the logic underlying causality when applied to qualitative variables. A few others have taken seriously the idea that a direct analysis of the form of a contingency table can lead to fruitful results (see, especially, for example, Boudon, 1967), but their work has been overshadowed by the statistically more profound advances made in log-linear methods. This article is an attempt to provide a statistically rigorous analysis based on the direct interpretation of causality embodied in a contingency table.     

The philosophy of modeling and futures research : A guide to different models

The concept of inquiry systems as originally formulated by Churchman is an exceedingly powerful one. Each inquiry system can be construed as an archetypal or generic kind of model structure that applies generally throughout all of the sciences. Recent development in the logic of argumentation and symbolic logic show how, paradoxically enough, the model structure of each inquiry system can itself be modeled in terms of the first-order predicate calculus. The result is a “model of models.” More important and more fundamental still, the effort shows the tremendous assumptions that must be bought if one is to warrant belief in any particular inquiry model.     

Evaluation of land administration systems

Currently there are no internationally accepted methodologies to evaluate and compare the performance of land administration systems. This is partly because land administration systems are in constant reform, and probably more importantly, they represent societies’ different perceptions of land. This paper describes the development of a framework to measure and compare the performance of land administration systems. The research is of particular relevance since it develops a management model which links the operational aspects of land administration with land policy.     

How Far Should Mr Keating Go?

Australia's current account deficit is large by historical standards and so is the boom in private investment spending. The net effect is a level of thrift that is not unusually low. A major uncertainty facing policymakers is how far unemployment can be reduced without causing an inflationary spiral. If unemployment can be reduced without igniting inflation, then there is a case for loosening monetary policy.