A model of translation of foreign financial statements under inflation in the United States and Canada*

Abstract. This study investigates the translation of foreign financial statements in inflationary economies. The analysis is conducted by comparing the results obtained from the temporal and current rate methods to the translated adjusted-for-inflation (TAI) financial statements under varying degrees of purchasing power parity. The findings indicate that under perfect purchasing power parity, the temporal method yields undistorted results versus TAI. The current rate method, however, results in a distortion. When the purchasing power parity degree is not perfect, both the current rate and temporal methods distort the results. However, if the inflation exceeds the devaluation of the local currency, translation using the temporal method results in a lower distortion. This result is reversed when the devaluation of the local currency exceeds the rate of inflation. The study then proceeds to examine, from the viewpoint of a standard-setting body, the translation models in a cost-benefit framework. The results indicate that TAI is usually the best. This result is due to the fact that the benchmark model is more informative than the other methods, and the information production costs are close to the costs under the temporal method. Further, if the rate of inflation exceeds the devaluation of the local currency, the temporal method dominates the current rate method. The opposite holds if the devaluation of the local currency exceeds the rate of inflation. Moreover, this study examines the implications of CICA Handbook. Section 1650. The findings indicate that the Canadian variant of the temporal methods results in a distortion even when the purchasing power parity assumption holds. Résumé. L'auteur s'intéresse à la conversion des états financiers dressés en devises, dans les économies inflationnistes. Son analyse repose sur la comparaison des résultats de l'application de la méthode temporelle et de la méthode du taux courant à la conversion des états financiers ajustés pour tenir compte de l'inflation, selon divers degrés de parité du pouvoir d'achat. Suivant les résultats obtenus en situation de parité parfaite du pouvoir d'achat, la conversion à l'aide de la méthode temporelle est sans biais par rapport à celle de la conversion des états financiers ajustés pour tenir compte de l'inflation. La méthode du taux courant donne lieu, quant à elle, à un biais. Lorsque la parité du pouvoir d'achat n'est pas parfaite, la méthode du taux courant et la méthode temporelle faussent toutes deux les résultats. Toutefois, si l'inflation excède la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale, la conversion à l'aide de la méthode temporelle donne un biais moins accentué, relation qui s'inverse lorsque la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale excède le taux d'inflation. L'auteur procède ensuite, du point de vue d'un organisme de normalisation, à l'analyse des modèles de conversion sous l'angle coûts-avantages. Les résultats indiquent que la conversion des états financiers ajustés pour tenir compte de l'inflation est habituellement la meilleure. Cette constatation découle du fait que le modèle étalon est plus informatif que les autres méthodes, et que les coûts de production de l'information se rapprochent des coûts associés à la méthode temporelle. En outre, si le taux d'inflation excède la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale, la méthode temporelle l'emporte sur celle du taux courant. L'opposé est vrai si la dévaluation de la monnaie nationale excède le taux d'inflation. Enfin, l'auteur analyse les conséquences du chapitre 1650 du Manuel de l'I.C.C.A. et en vient à la conclusion que la variante canadienne de la méthode temporelle donne lieu à un biais, même quand l'hypothèse de la parité du pouvoir d'achat est respectée.     

E–Commerce and the Australian Economy

This paper considers the likely impact of e–commerce and the Internet on the Australian economy. It surveys literature on the extent and development of e–commerce in Australia and its impact on the shape of the Australian economy. Evidence for the 'renewal' of the Australian economy is presented and examined, especially the question of whether Australia has enjoyed increases in productivity as a result of the production and/or use of new information and communications technology. Australia is seen as broadly well placed to benefit from the Internet and e–commerce. Traditionally isolated from the world's main economic centres and reliant on commodities in international trade, the advent of the Internet is ideal for a country in transition to a service–orientated, knowledge–based economy. As the composition of Australia's exports becomes more service–orientated and knowledge–intensive, traditional trading links with Europe and North America may strengthen relative to those with Asia.     

Comparative Advantage in Demand: Experimental Evidence of Preferences for Genetically Modified Food in the United States and European Union

The United States (US) exports more than US$6 billion in agricultural commodities to the European Union(EU) each year, but one issue carries the potential to diminish this trade: use of biotechnology in food production. The EU has adopted more stringent policies towards biotechnology than the US. Understanding differences in European and American policies towards genetically modified (GM) foods requires a greater understanding of consumers’ attitudes and preferences. This paper reports results from the first large‐scale, cross‐Atlantic study to analyse consumer demand for genetically modified food in a non‐hypothetical market environment. We strongly reject the frequent if convenient assumption in trade theory that consumer preferences are identical across countries: the median level of compensation demanded by English and French consumers to consume a GM food is found to be more than twice that in any of the US locations. Results have important implications for trade theory, which typically focuses on differences in specialization, comparative advantage and factor endowments across countries, and for on‐going trade disputes at the World Trade Organization.     

Tolerance for uncertainty and the growth of informationally opaque industries

Hofstede's [Hofstede, Geert H. 1980. Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.] cross-country psychological survey of IBM employees finds that some countries (societies) are systematically less tolerant of uncertainty, while uncertainty-tolerance is shown by some theoretic models to be essential to the growth of emerging sectors about which less is known. This paper first uses Durnev, Morck, and Yeung's [Durnev, Art, Morck, Randall, and Yeung, Bernard. 2004. Value-enhancing capital budgeting and firm-specific stock return variation. The Journal of Finance. 59(1): 65–105.] methodology to identify these informationally opaque industries. The hypothesis is then made that countries characterized by high uncertainty aversion (measured by Hofstede's indicator, and two other alternative indicators) will grow disproportionately slower in industrial sectors where information is less available. Using the Rajan and Zingales [Rajan, Raghuram G. and Zingales, Luigi. 1998. Financial Dependence and Growth. American Economic Review. Vol. 88(3): 559–586.] “difference-in-differences” methodology, which is relatively free from the endogeneity problem, the study provides robust evidence of such an industrial growth pattern in 34 countries and 36 manufacturing industries. It also shows that national uncertainty aversion is not driven by underdevelopment of financial sector, inadaptability of civil law systems, lower level of economic or human capital development, labor market inflexibility, or any of many other institutional factors. The results remain robust when religious (Catholic vs. Protestant) composition is used as an instrumental variable for national uncertainty aversion. The international evidence presented helps explain why some countries are slower in embracing “new” (vs. traditional) industries.     

Endogenous Group Formation

While the rules governing the formation of groups engaging in collective action may have significant impact on group size and behavior of members, most experiments on public goods have been conducted with the subjects in exogenously fixed groups or of fixed sizes. We study endogenous formation of groups in a public‐goods provision game by allowing subjects to change groups under three sets of rules: free entry/exit, restricted entry with free exit, and free entry with restricted exit. We find that the rules governing entry and exit do have a significant impact on individual behavior and group‐level outcomes.