PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN APEC COUNTRIES

Abstract. This paper introduces a new technique for measuring productivity growth and applies it to a sample of APEC countries. The technique is based on a version of Luenberger's shortage function which generalizes Shephard's input and output distance functions.     

Input-output separability in production models and its structural consequences

Separability of inputs and outputs in a multioutput technology is analyzed in this paper.     

Do Negotiated Agreements Lead to Cost Efficiency?

Received October 16, 2000; revised version received August 2, 2001     

Productivity, convergence and policy: a study of OECD countries and industries

This paper analyses trends in labour productivity and its underlying determinants in a panel of OECD countries from 1979 to 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to estimate a Malmquist measure of multifactor productivity (MFP) change. We decompose the growth in labour productivity into (i) net technological change (ii) input biased technical change (IBTC) (iii) efficiency change and (iv) capital accumulation. We analyse the effect of each of these factors in the transition towards the equilibrium growth paths of both labour productivity and per capita GDP for the OECD countries, controlling for the effects of different policies and institutions. The results indicate that on average gaps in productivity or income levels are narrowing down although there is no evidence to suggest that the entire OECD area comprises a single convergence “club”. Using kernel estimation methods we find that that labour productivity and per capita GDP are settling toward a twin peak (bimodal) distribution. Panel unit root tests over an extended (1960–2001) period provide general support for the convergence hypothesis. Analysis of the contributions of productivity growth within industries and sectoral composition changes show that aggregate productivity change is predominantly driven by ‘net’ within sector effects with very little contribution emerging from sectoral shifts (the ‘in-between’ static or dynamic effects resulting from higher or above average productivity industries gaining employment shares or low productivity industries losing shares).     

A “calculus” for data envelopment analysis

DEA models are not amenable to differential arguments for extreme efficient units. Consequently, function representations of the approximating technology are not differentiable in the usual sense. Dually, this nondifferentiability is manifested by multiple optima to the Charnes et al. (Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444, 1978) DEA problem. This paper shows how a “calculus” can be applied to DEA, and, in particular, how this “calculus” resolves the resulting weight choice problem uniquely. The “calculus” is based on the concept of willingness to pay and well-known results in the convex analysis literature (Rockafellar, Convex analysis, 1970) for directional derivatives and their associated superdifferentials.     

Output scaling in a cost function setting

A significant result in production theory is that even under a very weak condition on the technology, the cost function is well defined and linearly homogeneous in factor prices. We could term this homogeneity a scaling law, for an equiproportionate scaling of all factor prices results in an identical scaling of the value of the cost function. The purpose of this paper is to determine sets of conditions under which an analogous result may hold for the output variable in the cost function. Our analysis initially focuses on the cost function of a multioutput technology so that the output variable in the cost function is vector-valued. The results we obtain are that some output-scaling laws exist if and only if the underlying technology is ray-homothetic. In the final section we consider the meaning of the results for the single-output case.The refereeing process of this paper was handled through R. Robert Russell. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1989 Conference on Current Issues in Productivity, December 6–8, 1989, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.     

Für einen einfachen,transparenten und effizienten Finanzausgleich

Tax revenues are allocated to the “Länder”-budgets in a very complicated process which lacks any transparency and unsurprisingly has been (and is currently) the subject of numerous legal suits at the Federal Constitutional Court. But the most striking feature of the whole system is its final outcome: a nearly equal distribution (per head) of tax revenues among all 16 states. If that is the aim, the process could be achieved much more easily. The authors suggest a central tax administration, a political determination of the state’s tax share and a distribution of that share among the single states according to the population, partly weighted with the states domestic product per head. Such a system is simple and transparent and apt to fulfill distributional as well as allocational purposes.     

Why do medium- and large-scale farmers succeed practicing CA and small-scale farmers often do not? – experiences from Paraguay

Conservation agriculture (CA) is defined as a system comprising no or minimum mechanical soil disturbance, permanent organic soil cover, and crop species diversification [FAO. (2014). What is Conservation Agriculture? FAO CA website, consulted on 15.09.2014. Retrieved September 15, 2014, from http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html]. The vast majority of medium- and large-scale farmers in Paraguay and neighbouring countries (Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay) who use tractor-based farming systems have moved from conventional agriculture and adopted CA through no-tillage technologies. Among this farmer type, very few wish to return to the old system of tillage agriculture. However, despite massive efforts to transmit the technology to small-scale farmers by development aid projects and local governments, widespread adoption of CA has not happened on farms that use animal traction or manual farming systems; in fact significant dis-adoption of CA practices by smallholders has occurred. Some of the reasons for this dynamic are analysed in this paper. The reasons for dis-adoption by small-scale farmers can be generally divided into two groups. One group has to do with the fact that, comparatively, small-scale farmers are less able to cope with the factors related to CA (e.g. degraded soils, recuperating and maintaining soil fertility and know-how) than medium- and large-scale farmers. The second group of reasons has to do with the approaches and strategies that development aid agencies and local governments have taken towards small-scale farmers, which have influenced small-scale farmers’ ability to adopt and maintain CA practices. Small-scale farmers’ main asset is the soil and the CA/no-tillage system is a knowledge-based, learning-intensive system. However, despite the technical support provided by aid agencies and local governments, small-scale farmers often lack a deeper understanding of the CA concepts and practices. This is attributable to the short- to medium-term and rather conservative transfer-of-technology approaches that have been applied by development aid agency and local government programmes over the years, without any changes and without adaptive research. The latter can be derived, for instance, from the accountability of results to donor agencies or the one-size-fits-all approach applied in order to achieve ‘numbers’. One consequence of this is that ownership by and empowerment of farmers is often absent among dis-adopters. It therefore seems more suitable to apply long term, adaptable approaches to CA with smallholders. The lessons learned in Paraguay may well serve to properly direct future development intervention efforts in this country and also serve to mend development strategies in other countries in South and Central America, Africa or Asia.