Savings that hurt: Production rationalization and its effect on prices

Postmerger scenarios often lead to a reallocation of resources and production across the merged entity. Production rationalization, the process of reallocating production across facilities so as to reduce total costs, results in firms equating marginal costs across markets. This results in marginal costs, and hence prices, being higher in some markets and lower in others than otherwise would be without production rationalization. This paper proposes a model of competition that elicits these effects and the resulting consequences on consumer and producer surplus. The paper also presents empirical evidence to show that production rationalization, in the form of fleet reoptimization, affected prices following the US Airways/American Airlines merger. Prices of the merged firm increased 10% on routes typically served by US Airways relative to routes typically served by American Airlines, and by 12% relative to US Airways’ rivals’ prices. Price‐cost regressions confirm such price hikes were likely due to fleet reoptimization.     

Extreme exclusion and relative deprivation in subsistence marketplaces: A study in a refugee settlement in Nakivale,Uganda

We study how refugees in a settlement face extreme marketplace exclusion through three phases of qualitative research. Overlaying the context of subsistence marketplaces, such exclusion is accentuated by refugee status, fleeing from unimaginable suffering. We interpret our findings in terms of relative deprivation, or the state of feeling deprived relative to some social reference, often used to understand how consumers feel deprived in terms of their relative financial status. We extend relative deprivation theory in research, introducing extreme marketplace deprivation. Whereas most relative deprivation research emphasizes social comparisons to other people, our study of the refugee settlement demonstrates the adverse effects of intrapersonal relative deprivation, that is, feeling deprived relative to one's past. We develop a theoretical framework to demarcate types of extreme marketplace deprivation, classifying these experiences in terms of consumption and livelihood along three facets (material, social, and psychological). We derive implications for consumer affairs.     

Keep it,shave it,cut it: A closer look into consumers’ video viewing behavior

The convergence of communications, information, entertainment, commerce, and computing—combined with a rising number of new services—has caused changes in the way people access and consume media. In recent months, the phenomenon of viewing audiences shifting wholly or partially from cable TV providers to over-the-top (OTT) media, also known as cord cutting or cord shaving respectively, has gained much attention. Despite anecdotal evidence of cord cutting and cord shaving presented in the trade press and industry conferences, there has been little rigorous examination of the true effect that cord cutting or cord shaving may have on TV networks and the media industry at large. In this article, we use behavioral data from a leading cable operator in the U.S. to identify and describe the key viewer segments. We also conduct simulations to examine the effects and implications of cord cutting and cord shaving from a customer lifetime value perspective for content providers, content distributors, and advertisers.     

Trade disclosure regulation in markets with negotiated trades

In dealership markets disclosure of size and price of detailsof public trades is typically incomplete. We examine whetherfull and prompt disclosure of public-trade details improvesthe welfare of a risk-averse investor. We analyze a model ofdealership market where a market maker first executes a publictrade and then offsets her position by trading with other marketmakers. We distinguish between quantity risk and price revisionrisk. We show that if the market maker learns some informationabout the motive behind public trade, neither regime is unambiguouslywelfare superior. This is because greater transparency improvesquantity risk sharing but worsens price revision risk sharing.     

The boundary spanning capabilities of purchasing agents in buyer-supplier trust development

This study examines how individual purchasing agents function as boundary spanners with suppliers to influence trust development in themselves and the buying firms that employ them. Building upon boundary theory and supply chain cooperation research, we identify three boundary spanning capabilities of purchasing agents and empirically test how these capabilities shape buyer-supplier trust development. Using two samples of data collected from suppliers in the automotive industry and food industry, we found that a purchasing agent's effectiveness in strategic communication with suppliers affects a supplier's trust in the buying firm, while an agent's professional knowledge and ability toreach compromises with suppliers affect a supplier's trust in the purchasing agent representing the firm. Trust in the purchasing agent in turn affects trust in the buying firm. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.     

An analysis of commonality in the twin metropolitan areas of San Diego, California, and Tijuana, Mexico

A new application of spatial analysis is developed and applied to study the international twin metropolitan region of Tijuana, Mexico, and San Diego, California. Information on 16 variables from the US and Mexican censuses are merged in a common framework. A two-stage cluster analysis is applied to small area samples to determine metropolitan zones with common sets of characteristics. The results of the cluster analysis are spatially mapped and analyzed. This is done for all 16 variables, as well as for four variable groups that are determined through literature review and experience, and for an alternative set of variable groups derived from the data. The extent of commonality, defined as the similarity between socioeconomic and demographic profiles of the population in the San Diego-Tijuana region, is examined through the development of a commonality index that is determined by the extent of cluster overlap on both sides of the border. The findings are interpreted with respect to the research literature. The methods can be applied within academic research or in the planning of border cities having consistent data sets on both sides.     

Visibility effects and timing in stock listing changes: Evidence from operating performance

We extend the timing motive hypothesis to account for the influence of improved visibility as a result of a stock listing change. The results are, in general, consistent with this proposition, especially for Nasdaq and AMEX firms that switch to the NYSE. The empirical findings support the positive relationship of the visibility effect with post-listing operating returns. The evidence is mixed for the timing motive. The evidence is also mixed for both timing and visibility in the case of Nasdaq firms that move to the AMEX. An important finding is that post-listing operating performance has improved after the 1996 Nasdaq market reforms that reduced the NYSE advantage of lower liquidity costs and, thus, made opportunistic timing less important in listing change decisions. In addition, some evidence points to an association between differences in expected visibility improvement due to variation in listing standards and the pattern of post-listing operating performance.     

The Pricing of Insurer Demutualization Initial Public Offerings

This article examines the pricing of the initial public offerings (IPOs) that follow insurance company demutualizations. Insurers that convert from mutual to stock form typically cite the need for capital as a key motivation. Given that capital adequacy is a primary regulatory objective for insurers, one would expect that for a given number of shares to be sold, these firms would price their offerings to maximize proceeds. However, the vast literature on IPO pricing suggests various theories as to why it may be in the issuing firm's best interest to underprice its offering. By examining the initial and long‐run stock returns for these conversion IPOs, the existence and degree of underpricing, as characterized by large initial returns, can be determined. It is observed that on average demutualization insurer IPOs post significantly higher first‐day returns than nondemutualization insurer IPOs. These gains would accrue to the initial investors and to those policyholders who receive compensation in the form of shares in the newly created stock insurer. Attractive returns are sustained for both groups of insurers during the first few years after IPO.     

On the Existence of Linear Equilibria in Models of Market Making

We derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a linear equilibrium in three types of competitive market making models: Kyle type models (when market makers only observe aggregate net order flow), Glosten–Milgrom and Easley–O'Hara type models (when market makers observe and trade one order at a time), and call markets models (individual order models when market makers observe a number of orders before pricing and executing any of them). We study two cases: when privately informed (strategic) traders are symmetrically informed and when they have differential information. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions on the distributions of the random variables for a linear equilibrium. We also explore those features of the equilibrium that depend on linearity as opposed to the particular distributional assumptions and we provide a large number of examples of linear equilibria for each of the models.     

A theory of the interday variations in volume, variance, and trading costs in securities markets

In an adverse selection model of a securities market with oneinformed trader and several liquidity traders, we study theimplications of the assumption that the informed trader hasmore information on Monday than on other days. We examine theinterday variations in volume, variance, and adverse selectioncosts, and find that on monday the trading costs and the varianceof price changes are highest, and the volume is lower than onTuesday. These effects are stronger for firms with better publicreporting and for firms with more discretionary liquidity trading.