VASIČEK BEYOND THE NORMAL

A general Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process is obtained upon replacing the Brownian motion appearing in the defining stochastic differential equation with a general Lévy process. Certain properties of the Brownian ancestor are distribution-free and carry over to the general OU process. Explicit expressions are obtainable for expected values of a number of functionals of interest also in the general case. Special attention is paid here to gamma- and Poisson-driven OU processes. The Brownian, Poisson, and gamma versions of the OU process are compared in various respects; in particular, their aptitude to describe stochastic interest rates is discussed in view of some standard issues in financial and actuarial mathematics: prices of zero-coupon bonds, moments of present values, and probability distributions of present values of perpetuities. The problem of possible negative interest rates finds its resolution in the general setup by taking the driving Lévy process to be nondecreasing.     

Production Risk and Productivity Growth: Some Findings for Norwegian Salmon Aquaculture

This paper deals with estimation of primal panel data models of production risk, focusing on measurement of risk properties of inputs and productivity growth. Under production risk one should estimate technical change separately for the deterministic part and risk part of the technology, since risk averse producers will take into account both the mean and variance of output when they rank alternative technologies. For a panel of Norwegian salmon farms fish feed and fish input are found to increase output risk, while labor has a risk-decreasing effect on output. In the analysis of technical change by the first order stochastic dominance criterion the increase in mean output dominates the increase in output risk.     

Regional strategies for injury prevention: Experiences from six county-wide programs in Sweden∗

Abstract

Community approaches predominate in safety promotion, and most experience has been gained at the local municipal level. Regional and national programs are also underway, partly influenced by the same theoretical and methodological principles as applied locally. In this paper, six already initiated regional (county-wide) injury prevention programs in Sweden are examined with regard to strategic considerations and in the light of principles discussed in the literature. It is argued that the community approach is less suitable for larger settings, such as counties, and that there is a need for additional and complementary approaches for higher societal levels and formal governmental and administrative structures.     

The ‘Plateau‐ing’ of the European Better Regulation Agenda: An Analysis of Activities Carried out by the Barroso Commission

In this paper we examine cases commonly characterised as risk‐risk tradeoffs (i.e., creating new risks while solving existing ones), in an attempt to learn lessons that can be valuable for future regulatory decision‐making. A broad range of environmental and health literature was reviewed and numerous cases of proclaimed risk‐risk tradeoffs were analysed in order to determine: 1) why regulatory measures were initially taken, 2) why these measures caused a countervailing risk to emerge, 3) how tradeoffs could have been avoided, and 4) whether the case is a good example of a risk‐risk tradeoff. The analysis reveals that only a small number of these cases can actually be considered risk‐risk tradeoffs. In a large number of cases safer alternatives are and were available at the time decisions were made. In some cases the proclaimed risk‐risk tradeoff simply did not exist or occur, and in some cases countervailing risks were ignored for reasons unknown. In many cases, the countervailing risks could have been anticipated and avoided by proactively seeking safer alternatives, completing a tradeoff and impact assessment, or increasing stakeholder input in the decision‐making process. We conclude that concerns about risk‐risk tradeoffs are not a reasonable argument against future application of the precautionary principle. Indeed, sound decision‐making processes in the face of uncertainty should always consider and attempt to mitigate reasonable risk‐risk tradeoffs.