Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?

We aim to tackle the longstanding debate on whether stock liquidity enhances or impedes firm innovation. This topic is of interest because innovation is crucial for firm‐ and national‐level competitiveness and stock liquidity can be altered by financial market regulations. Using a difference‐in‐differences approach that relies on the exogenous variation in liquidity generated by regulatory changes, we find that an increase in liquidity causes a reduction in future innovation. We identify two possible mechanisms through which liquidity impedes innovation: increased exposure to hostile takeovers and higher presence of institutional investors who do not actively gather information or monitor.     

On distributions of functions of samples from a normally distributed infinite population

Abstract

7. The joint distribution of the moments a ₁₁, a ₂₂,…, a_nn and a ₁₂, …, a _1n may be deduced explicitly in the case, in which the variates χ₁, …, χ _n in (1) are mutually uncorrelated. In this case we have for the population values of the moments: α_μv = 0 for μ ═ v and, consequently, A_μv = 0 for μ ═ v, so that according to (6) λ_μv = 0 for μ ═ v; the distribution (5) of the moments α_μv is then      

The Impact of Deregulation on Casino Win in Atlantic City

This paper examines the impact of deregulation on thedemand for casino gaming in Atlantic City. Specifically, the paper analyzes the impact ofexpanded operating hours and floor space devoted toslot machines. Using monthly win data between June1978 and July 1996, the analysis reveals that expandedfloor space had a significant, positive impact on win,resulting in an average monthly increase of over $2million. This shows the importance of developing aregulatory structure rigid enough to ensure thehonesty and integrity of the gaming industry, butflexible enough to allow management to respond tochanging market conditions.