Metagame analysis of competitive strategy

The need for effective competitive strategy planning for a firm's survival and growth has long been recognized to be important. The identification and selection of good, or robust, market strategies must be based on the anticipation of the likely strategies of significant competitors, who should ideally be visualized as undergoing a similar process of assessing their own and other's goals and probable strategies. This paper reviews and evaluates the traditional economic and game theoretic approaches to competitive strategy analysis and presents an application of metagame analysis—an approach which has not previously been used in the strategic business environment. This approach, which appears to have some significant advantages over both economic and game theoretic approaches has been utilized and evaluated in a business firm (Dutta and King, forthcoming). An illustration of its use, which is based on a real-world application, is discussed.     

A contingent-claim integration of cost-volume-profit analysis with capital budgeting*

Abstract. This paper integrates cost-volume-profit (CVP) analysis into the theory of capital budgeting by modeling the profit function in the CVP relation as put and call options on sales revenue. Such an approach is shown to be particularly useful when the profit function is piecewise linear, such as when there are multiple break-even points, or when the profit function is truncated. The results are of general applicability because such an approach does not require making assumptions about the decision maker's risk attitude. This claim is proven by showing that certain well-known decision models in the extant literature can be derived as specific cases from the results. The paper also shows how the CVP analysis can be extended to the case in which there is a dependence of the firm's cash flows on macroeconomic variables. Specifically, it applies to the CVP analysis the state-contingent claim approach to capital budgeting of Banz-Miller (1978) and relates the option valuation approach to Banz and Miller's framework. A numerical example using the state prices of Banz-Miller is provided. Résumé. Les auteurs associent l'analyse coût-volume-profit (CVP) à la théorie de l'établissement du budget des investissements en intégrant la fonction de profit dans l'interaction CVP à titre d'option de vente et d'achat sur le produit des ventes. Cette methode semble particulièrement utile lorsque la fonction de profit est linéaire mais morcelée. Il en ainsi, par exemple, lorsqu'il existe plusieurs seuils de rentabilité ou lorsque la fonction de profit est tronquee. Les résultats peuvent êtres généralisés puisqu'une méthode de ce genre n'exige pas la formulation d'hypothèses relatives à l'attitude du décideur à l'egard du risque. Cette affirmation est étayée par les auteurs qui montrent que certains modèles décisionnels bien connus dans la documentation existante peuvent être dérivés des résultats obtenus sous forme de cas précis. Les auteurs montrent également comment l'analyse coût-volume-profit peut être étendue au cas où les flux monétaires de l'entreprise dépendent de variables macroéconomiques. De façon précise, ils appliquent à l'analyse coût-volume-profit la méthode des créances conditionnelles à un état proposée par Banz et Miller pour établir le budget des investissements, et ils relient la méthode d'évaluation de l'option à la formule de Banz et Miller. Les auteurs proposent un exemple numérique dans lequel ils recourent aux prix de l'état de Banz-Miller.     

Europe,Germany and “The German Model”: Economic Links and Implications for China

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the economic links first between the European Union (EU) and China and then I focus on the economic relationships between Germany and China. The links I will consider include international trade and direct investment. Lastly I highlight some elements of the so-called “German Model” or the “Berlin Way” and examine if they can be of policy relevance to China. There are four main results: first, EU-China trade and investment relationships are strong, deepening rapidly but they are somewhat unbalanced and asymmetric. Second, the economic relationships between Europe and China are focused on manufacturing. Third, the EU-China relationships are primarily Deutschland-centric. Lastly, elements of the “German Model” such as Mitbestimmung, Mittelstand and the German apprenticeship system can have important structural and policy implications as China continues to grow and experiment with reforms aiming at combining stability, harmony and competitiveness.