The Role of the Safety Net and the Labor Market on Falling Cash Consumption in Russia: 1994–96 A Quintile-Based Decomposition Analysis

This paper investigates the relative importance of changes in social safety net support and labor market in explaining the decline in the purchasing power of Russian households that occurred during the period 1994–96. Drawing on three cross-sections of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey, we find that labor market changes have been the main cause of the observed decline in cash consumption. Among these changes, reductions in the impact of the time spent in employment and increasing frequency of wage arrears are most important, more so than increases in open unemployment or the fall in real wages among workers who were fully paid. The contribution of falling state transfers to cash consumption is nonetheless substantial. We also find that the sources of the decline in household welfare vary substantially across quintiles in the distribution.     

Efficiency in banking services: a comparative analysis of Internet-primary and branching banks in the US

This paper investigates the provision of financial services by banks as a two-stage production process involving three different basic activities. The first stage includes service activities, while the second stage comprises both investment-related and risk management activities. Financial services performance is assessed in terms of service efficiency and investment and risk management efficiency for years 2002–2010. The major empirical findings are that the Internet-primary bank is more efficient than most branching banks in deposit-raising activities, but with regard to investment and risk management activities, there are many brick-and-mortar banks that match the online bank performance.     

Evaluating the Market and Welfare Impacts of Agricultural Policies in Developed Countries: Comparison of Partial and General Equilibrium Measures

We revisit the question of choosing partial equilibrium or general equilibrium modeling in applied policy analysis in the context of evaluating the effects of a complete phase-out of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union. We compare the results of three models—two three-sector general equilibrium models (one with an additional major distortion in the nonagricultural sector) and a two-sector partial equilibrium model. We find that the market effects of a complete phase-out of the CAP are quite comparable across these models. On the other hand, the measured welfare impacts may depend on the modeling choice.     

Economic Reform and Behaviour of State-Owned Enterprises in Vietnam

MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies -     

The Future of European Union Dairy Policy

Even if the quota regime has been extended until 2007–08 as part of the Agenda 2000 reform adopted in March 1999, the European Union (EU) dairy sector is currently experiencing large uncertainty over future policy. This paper examines EU dairy policy issues and assesses their likely implications. It mainly addresses the central question of dismantling the quota and intervention support mechanisms. Simulation results illustrate how three factors (marginal costs of production, import tariffs on dairy products and compensatory payments granted to dairy producers) may affect the outcomes of a quota elimination scenario.
Même si le régime des quotas a été prolongé jusqu'en 2007–2008 à l'occasion de la réforme Agenda 2000 de mars 1999, le débat sur la nécessité d'une réforme plus importante de la politique laitiére européenne n'est pas clos. Dans ce papier, nous analysons les différentes contraintes auxquelles l'Union européenne doit faire face et ses implications pour le secteur laitier communautaire. L'attention est centrée sur les conséquences d'une suppression du régime des quotas et du mécanisme de l'intervention. Les résultats de simulation montrent comment les conséquences d'un tel scénario dépendent de trois facteurs, i.e., les coûts marginaux de production du lait, la protection tarifaire sur les importations européennes de produits laitiers et les mesures de compensation accordées aux producteurs de lait.     

Assessing CAP Reform: Sensitivity of Modelling Decoupled Policies

The European Union reformed farm policy in June 2003 towards the decoupling of farm income support instruments. Available impact studies find that this reform reduces production incentives substantially for beef and to a lesser extent for arable crops. However, these studies assume that the previous reform, under Agenda 2000, already decoupled arable crop direct payments to a considerable extent, while beef premiums were linked more closely to production. Our main objective in this paper is to test the sensitivity of these results to this questionable modelling of Agenda 2000 direct payments, which neglects eligibility rules and land market imperfections. Our analysis reveals that the effects of the reform on both arable crop and beef production are always negative, however the Agenda 2000 direct payments are modelled. On the other hand, we show that, when the eligibility rules and land market imperfections are acknowledged, the production reducing effects may be much larger for arable crops than for beef. Policy implications of these results are noted.     

Why does the current account matter?

Summary Professor Lamfalussy discusses the nature and significance of the current account of the balance of payments. After a general analysis he applies his reasoning to the problems connected with the oil-price explosion and their effects on the pattern of current-account positions of various groups of countries. He arrives at two conclusions. The first is probably not very controversial: the international distribution of current-account imbalances deserves to remain in the centre of economic analysis because they are the vehicle for transferring real resources and because the position of its current account may have far-reaching consequences on each country's exchange rate, domestic price developments, income distribution and growth prospects. The second is that for these very reasons policy makers cannot disregard the structure of the balance of payments — even if they will have to realise that it is often not in their power to achieve what would seem to be an optimum structure.