Regulatory Reform, Capture, and the Regulatory Burden

This paper provides a critique of broad aggregate proposalsto reduce the regulatory burden. It argues that the public debateabout regulatory reform and red tape is loose and general, withlittle regard for the complex ways in which regulation imposescosts and benefits on the economy. Although there are theoreticalreasons to expect regulation to be in excess supply, there islittle empirical analysis to link aggregate regulation withproductivity and economic growth. Regulation is itself a publicgood, and many aspects of economic efficiency require regulationto address market failures. The main efficiency issues are betteraddressed through a disaggregated approach, focusing on when,where, and how to regulate, rather than on crude aggregate estimatesof the total burden. The design of regulation needs to takeaccount of regulatory capture, and it is argued that market-basedinstruments and independent regulatory bodies tend to reducethe scope for capture. The incentives and employment rules governingregulatory institutions are also discussed. In ignoring thesedisaggregated regulatory design problems, crude aggregate targetsfor the reduction of regulation, and rules such as ‘onein, one out’ may be counter-productive. Footnotes ¹ E-mail address: dieter{at}dhelm.co.uk     

Problems with leakages at large flanges in the BASF new ammonia plant

Leakage from large diameter flanges had occurred several times in a new 1360 t/d ammonia plant. One such incident resulted in a large fire. The causes of this incident are examined.     

HAZOP-proof ammonia plant: A new way of defining a safe and reliable design

This new technique, which meets interacting design criteria of a 1,800-MTPD ammonia project, offers special safety features and withstands a detailed HAZOP study.     

Reviewing the intellectual structure of product modularization: Toward a common view and future research agenda

Product modularization in new product development has attracted considerable interest among scholars and practitioners from diverse fields of specialization. This has resulted in cross-disciplinary diversity in the field, diverting attention from its overall intellectual structure and hindering the development of a common view and shared concepts. Extant research lacks an integrative review, transcending a focal discipline that could identify gaps and ambiguities while making recommendations to advance the field. Considering a period of 30 years (1990–2020), we generate a data set of 2988 citing publications to which we apply a co-citation analysis. Thereby, we uncover the intellectual structure of the field and find three research perspectives that represent key knowledge bases: (1) product system, (2) production system, and (3) organizational system. Delimiting the data set into four periods, we can track developments over time, where we notice an increasing disintegration of the product system perspective, which is rooted in the discipline of engineering design. Within the two other perspectives, we document extensive dynamism in terms of publications, especially in the two most recent periods, indicating an active discussion and a potential receptivity to new trends. For these periods, we also identify an emerging cluster of fundamental publications and an increasing emphasis on the concept of system architecture. Leveraging the synthesis of these results, we forge links between neighboring disciplines and recommend avenues for further research, ideally to develop a more common view.     

Green-tech firm creation in Germany: the role of regional knowledge

International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal - Due to the increasing awareness on environmental issues, the necessity to implement more sustainable technologies is becoming a central theme...