京津冀R&D资源与创新活动关系比较分析

通过构建京津冀R&D资源—创新活动—创新绩效的概念模型,采用协整检验和格兰杰因果关系分析等经济计量方法,对京津冀R&D资源与创新活动的关系、创新与经济绩效的关系进行了实证研究。结果表明:河北省政府资金和企业资金分别与专利和新产品销售收入存在长期稳定关系;天津市政府资金和企业资金对新产品销售收入存在长期稳定关系;北京市各变量之间关系不明显。     

中国信贷融资便利指数分析与国际比较

世界银行自2003年开始每年出版《全球商业环境报告》,评估各国和地区的商业环境.根据世界银行《2012全球商业环境报告》的衡量标准,通过对中国信贷融资便利指数的分析,并同其他重要经济体进行国际比较,认为中国应进一步提高征信总覆盖率,扩大非银行信息采集范围,加强征信立法和对担保债权人的权利保护,以期对未来我国信贷市场和征信体系的进一步发展及改革提供参考.     

新型职业农民智能化技术采纳行为研究

随着数字化时代的到来,智能化技术已成为拉动经济增长的强大动力,并深入到了农业农村的各个领域,在我国农业发展中得到越来越多的运用,而新型职业农民则在农业发展中发挥着示范、辐射和引领的积极作用。因此,新型职业农民这一群体采纳智能化技术的行为对我国农业发展有着难以忽视的影响。在此背景下,本文首先基于实验经济学,重点分析了认知特征、政府的补贴及不同的风险收益类型对新型职业农民智能技术采纳行为的影响;然后依据已有研究提出假设,并通过非参数检验方法进行检验。检验结果显示:认知特征对新型职业农民智能化技术的采纳行为存在正向影响;政府补贴有助于新型职业农民接纳智能化技术在农业生产中的运用,并与补贴的金额呈正相关;与风险偏好型的激励政策相比,规避风险损失的激励政策对新型职业农民的影响程度更显著。最后根据验证结果提出提高新型职业农民智能化技术使用率的建议,以助力农业现代化建设。     

成渝地区双城经济圈建设战略下四川宜宾三江新区产城融合评价指标构建

《成渝地区双城经济圈建设规划纲要》对细化和落实成渝地区双城经济圈发展战略作出了重要指示。为深入贯彻成渝地区双城经济圈发展战略,培育带动四川省经济高质量发展,四川省将宜宾市三江新区确定为四川省首个省级新区。为推进宜宾三江新区产业园区城市化进程,推动三江新区成为成渝地区南部和川滇黔结合部的核心引擎,本研究以宜宾三江新区为研究对象,以产城融合发展为主题搜集原始资料,结合成渝地区双城经济圈建设、宜宾市政府发展政策文本、深度访谈记录等文献资料对产城融合评价指标体系进行完善,并对宜宾三江新区产城融合进行评价,在此基础上提出宜宾三江新区产城融合发展优化路径。     

西部地区农业参与国家价值链分工的程度及位置研究

文章基于2012年和2017年中国省级多区域投入产出表构建价值链“参与程度—复杂程度—生产位置”指数框架,对西部地区农业参与国家价值链的程度及生产位置等进行分析。本文得出的主要结论为:相较于参与其他地区价值链的程度,西部各省份农业参与东部地区价值链的前向参与程度指数明显较高;大部分西部省份对区域内部和外部地区的后向产业关联增强;西部地区参与国家价值链的前向和后向生产长度都有所减少。在研究期内,西部地区农业在国家分工网络中从价值链的上游变为下游,在东北地区分工网络中处于价值链上游,在东部地区处于价值链下游。根据研究结论,本文提出应沿产业链推动跨省、跨区域产业协同合作,提升农业科技水平,延长农业价值链的长度,以形成国内农业产业链大循环。     

基于大数据文本分析的云南旅游服务质量感知研究

在新冠肺炎疫情的冲击下旅游业进入寒冬,学界开始愈发关注游客自身,游客的情感特征和行为特征研究也成为重要话题。文章基于大数据技术获取赴云南旅游游客的评论数据,运用情感分析方法对游客的情感倾向和特征进行分析,了解游客对云南旅游服务质量的感知情况,最后运用可视化技术将其直观地展示出来,深度挖掘评论文本信息,探寻影响游客情感倾向的主要因素。结果表明:（1）游客产生正、负面情感评论的原因不同。（2）游客非常重视旅途中的体验感。（3）游客对不同城市的情感倾向与该城市的旅游基础特征息息相关。同时,文章从游客角度出发,试图利用旅游大数据研究游客情感偏好,通过分析游客产生正负面情感倾向的原因,为云南省旅游服务质量优化提供了思路,并提出改进建议,以期提高云南省旅游服务质量水平,推动疫情之下的旅游业回暖。     

Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: a test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede

Transaction cost economics (TCE) is probably the most widely accepted theory on how firms can gain competitive advantage through efficient organization of their economic transactions. However, by focusing on the competitive environment in which companies operate, it abstracts from the cultural context in which governance decisions are made. We study the cultural boundedness of TCE using two seminal cultural theories: the political science/sociology framework of Inglehart and the management science framework of Hofstede. We use these theories to develop (main-effect) hypotheses about the cultural contexts in which TCE has higher predictive power as well as (interaction) hypotheses regarding particular cultural contexts that may inherently be more inclined than others to adopt certain non-market governance modes if the market “fails.” Hypotheses are tested using a meta-analysis on data collected from 128 studies from 12 countries on 3 continents, representing governance decisions of 60,926 companies. We find that TCE is a universal theory across all cultural contexts. This being said, we find that in societies low on power distance and in societies characterized by a strong emphasis on secular-rational and self-expression values, companies are more strongly guided in their governance decisions by economic, transaction-cost considerations than companies in societies high on power distance and in countries that are characterized by traditional and survival values. Further, TCE’s power to predict the specific type of non-market governance employed by the firm is systematically moderated by the national culture in which the firm operates. The power of TCE for predicting hierarchical governance is higher in countries that rate high on secular-rational values and on uncertainty avoidance and low on long-term orientation, whereas TCE is more diagnostic for predicting relational governance in countries high on self-expression values and low on power distance and on uncertainty avoidance. In sum, our meta-analysis provides support for our thesis that to fully understand governance choices made by firms, we need to integrate TCE and cultural theory. While managers around the world are guided by economic considerations, the cultural context in which they operate exerts a substantial—and predictable—contingent effect on their governance choices.     

Perceived marketing–sales relationship effectiveness: a matter of justice

There is a compelling need to improve the relationship between managers in marketing and sales departments. This paper argues that one critical way of enhancing individual managers’ perceptions of relationship effectiveness between these departments is to view the issue as a matter of justice and suggests that perceived marketing–sales relationship effectiveness is positively influenced by managers’ perceptions of organizational justice. Furthermore, it proposes that interfunctional communication has the potential to enhance the proposed positive effects of justice and hence needs to be considered and effectively managed when looking at marketing–sales relationship effectiveness. Data drawn from a survey of 203 marketing and sales managers in 38 consumer packaged goods companies are used to empirically test these predictions. The authors find that perceived sales–marketing relationship effectiveness is influenced by perceptions of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Greater interfunctional communication is found to further enhance the positive effects of distributive and procedural justice on perceived relationship effectiveness, but it does not contribute to the already strong positive effects of interactional justice. Furthermore, results reveal important differences in the effects of justice on perceived relationship effectiveness across the marketing and sales departments.